α-chlorotoluene (CAS 100-44-7) — Safety Data Sheet
Safety data sheet documentation for α-chlorotoluene (CAS 100-44-7), compiled to REACH Annex II with classification read against the harmonised entry in CLP Annex VI (H350, H331, H302, H335). Two options: a working draft sent by e-mail immediately, or a signed card issued within 72 hours of complete input. The item supplied is a document — MolGod.org does not sell, supply or ship chemical substances.
Free, and generated automatically from the sources listed on this page. No person has reviewed it, and it describes the substance in general — not your material, your process or your intended market.
Section 9 — physicochemical properties: 10 of 22 established.
We show what is established and name what is not. Classification and identity are complete on every card; section 9 is where public data is thin.
Identity, structure, physical and chemical properties, analytical data and the literature — every value with the source it came from and the date that source was read. The full record is in the data sections further down this page.
Identity CAS · EC · IUPAC · synonyms · molecular formula · molecular weight
Structure 2D · 3D · SMILES · InChI · InChIKey
Physical melting point · boiling point · density · vapour pressure · solubility
Chemical reactivity · stability · incompatible materials
Analytical spectra and methods where available
References literature, with DOI where a DOI exists
Identifier coverage is shown as a count, not as a quality rating. It tells you how well characterised this substance is in public data — which is a different question from how good it is, and a more useful one when you are deciding whether the documentation behind it can be defended.
This page sells the documentation for this substance, not the substance. Choose the level you need.
€0Audit the sheet you already haveSend us your existing sheet for this substance and we tell you what is wrong with it. One per company. If it turns out to be sound, you buy nothing.Start the free audit →
€49.99Working draftThe complete sixteen-section document, referenced, downloadable immediately after checkout. The right choice while the paperwork is still moving.
€249.99Signed cardThe same document reviewed and signed, issued within 72 hours of complete input — for the moment somebody official asks who stands behind it.
Documentation available for this substance: safety data sheet · CLP label · certificate of analysis on request · specification. Languages: the official language of your destination market, produced per card.
Grade, purity, physical form, packaging, minimum order and lead time are not shown, because MolGod does not supply the material — those are facts about a seller, and there is no seller on this page. They appear on storefronts we build for suppliers, where somebody can answer for them.
What a compliance officer checks, and where it sits in the document. The values themselves are in the regulatory sections further down.
Classification harmonised entry with index number where one exists; self-classification shown separately and labelled, never merged
Hazard statements the official text, in the page language
Precautionary statements combined statements reproduced whole, never split
Pictograms and signal word
Inventory status per jurisdiction, each stated individually
Restrictions entry and scope where one applies
Authorisation entry and sunset date where one applies
Candidate list status and the supply-chain duty it triggers
Transport entry per mode — road, sea, air
Exposure limits per country, each naming the act it comes from
Document status revision date and the amendment in force when issued
Fields with no established status say so. This page never states that no restrictions apply — absence from a dataset is not clearance, and a document that treats it as clearance is the most dangerous kind of document in this field.
A digital PDF safety data sheet in the sixteen-section structure of REACH Annex II (Regulation 1907/2006).
Substance identification, hazard classification, physicochemical, toxicological and ecological information, and regulatory references.
Classification read against the harmonised entry in CLP Annex VI where one exists for the substance.
A version number, a compilation date, and the source behind each value that carries one.
Delivery by e-mail. Nothing is shipped.
What this is not
Not a chemical substance, not a sample, not any physical goods.
Not a certification. No official certification scheme for safety data sheets exists in the European Union.
Not legal approval, and not a guarantee of compliance in any jurisdiction.
Not a substitute for your own regulatory assessment, nor for the safety data sheet supplied by the manufacturer or importer of the substance you actually hold.
Not adapted to a specific workplace, process or national annex unless you provide that information.
Where the available evidence does not support a value, the sheet states that the value is not established rather than estimating one. A field with no recorded source is marked as such.
What is in the buyer pack
Everything your compliance officer will ask for, in one file.
The product page as PDF — the record as published, so what you forward matches what you read.
The safety data sheet at your entitlement level — sixteen sections in the order set by REACH Annex II, for this substance, in the language you select.
The CLP label artwork — generated from the same classification as the sheet, so the two cannot disagree.
The specification, and the certificate of analysis where batch data exists.
sources.txt — every citation with the date it was read.
An explicit list of what we could not establish — fields marked unavailable rather than filled with an estimate. This is the honest part of the document and we do not hide it in a footnote.
Your European buyer is going to forward this to somebody who was not on the call. The pack exists so that what they forward is complete, self-explanatory and traceable — rather than four attachments and a sentence beginning “I think this is everything”.
These switch the language of this page. Single substances. Mixtures on enquiry. One document, one language — additional languages are priced separately. Every version, including the Chinese one, is written to EU law — (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) Annex II and (EU) 2020/878 — and translated from it. The Chinese version is a reference translation, not a legally valid document for the Chinese market: an SDS for China must be compiled separately to GB/T 16483 and GB/T 17519.
Model 3D Benzyl Chloride, CAS 100-44-7, wzór sumaryczny C7H7Cl, masa molowa 126.58 g/mol
Dane transkrybowane z rejestrów regulacyjnych i literatury fachowej, z podaniem źródła i wydania. Nie zastępują karty charakterystyki dostawcy. Pola bez zapisanego źródła oznaczone jako takie.
📊 Dane fizykochemiczne — CAS 100-44-7
📊Właściwości fizykochemiczne
Szybki przegląd
Wzór:C7H7Cl
MW:126.58 g/mol
CAS:100-44-7
🔬 Właściwości zaawansowane
Identyfikatory chemiczne
SMILES:C1=CC=C(C=C1)CCl
Ostatnia aktualizacja: 2026-08-25
📐Właściwości fizykochemiczne (baza danych)
5 fields MolGod Score: Brak źródła
PubChem. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NIH/NLM), chemical compound database. ↗
dotyczy: Wzór sumaryczny · Masa cząsteczkowa · LogP (lipofilowość) · Nazwa IUPAC · SMILES · InChIKey
NIST. Chemistry WebBook, SRD 69. National Institute of Standards and Technology. ↗
dotyczy: Temperatura topnienia
Maria M. Palaiologou, Ioanna E. Molinou. (1995). "Excess Volumes of Ethyl Acetate + Toluene, + o-Chlorotoluene, and + p-Chlorotoluene from 283.15 to 303.15 K". Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data.
B. Busa Goud, P. Venkatesu, M. V. Prabhakara Rao. (1995). "Excess Volumes of 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane or Tetrachloroethene + 2-Chlorotoluene, + 3-Chlorotoluene, and + 4-Chlorotoluene at 303.15 and 31
db:crossref
Maria M. Palaiologou, Ioanna E. Molinou. (1995). "Excess Volumes of Ethyl Acetate + Toluene, + o-Chlorotoluene, and + p-Chlorotoluene from 283.15 to 303.15 K". Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. https://doi.org/10.1021/je00020a031 →
db:crossref
B. Busa Goud, P. Venkatesu, M. V. Prabhakara Rao. (1995). "Excess Volumes of 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane or Tetrachloroethene + 2-Chlorotoluene, + 3-Chlorotoluene, and + 4-Chlorotoluene at 303.15 and 313.15 K". Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. https://doi.org/10.1021/je00022a013 →
Status regulacyjny substancji
Ta substancja podlega wymogom regulacyjnym: gospodarka odpadami niebezpiecznymi (BDO). Szczegoly w sekcji "Status regulacyjny (REACH/ECHA/CLP)" oraz na karcie SDS. Informacja regulacyjna — nie ogranicza zakupu w sklepie.
🧮 Kalkulator stechiometryczny
🧪 Dane chemiczne
Numer CAS
100-44-7
Wzór sumaryczny
C7H7Cl
Masa molowa
126.58 g/mol
Nazwa IUPAC (EN)
chloromethylbenzene
SMILES
C1=CC=C(C=C1)CCl
InChIKey
KCXMKQUNVWSEMD-UHFFFAOYSA-N
📡 Data sources
The data in this widget comes from the following verified scientific sources:
PubChem — National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI/NIH), USA
ChEMBL — European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), UK
NIST WebBook — National Institute of Standards and Technology, USA
Dane są buforowane lokalnie dla szybkości — widget działa także offline.
★★☆☆☆CROSSREF🔓 OPEN❓ unverifiedAnonymous. "Kinetics of Dissociative Electron Transfer in Electrocarboxylation of Benzyl Chloride.". https://doi.org/10.1021/acselectrochem.5c00094.s004.link[dostep: 2026-09-25]CC0 (metadata)
★★☆☆☆CROSSREF🔓 OPEN❓ unverifiedAnonymous. "Kinetics of Dissociative Electron Transfer in Electrocarboxylation of Benzyl Chloride.". https://doi.org/10.1021/acselectrochem.5c00094.s002.link[dostep: 2026-09-25]CC0 (metadata)
★★☆☆☆CROSSREF🔓 OPEN❓ unverifiedAnonymous. "Kinetics of Dissociative Electron Transfer in Electrocarboxylation of Benzyl Chloride.". https://doi.org/10.1021/acselectrochem.5c00094.s003.link[dostep: 2026-09-25]CC0 (metadata)
★★☆☆☆CROSSREF🔓 OPEN❓ unverifiedAnonymous. "Kinetics of Dissociative Electron Transfer in Electrocarboxylation of Benzyl Chloride.". https://doi.org/10.1021/acselectrochem.5c00094.s001.link[dostep: 2026-09-25]CC0 (metadata)
National Institute of Standards and Technology. 2024. "NIST Chemistry WebBook, SRD 69." Gaithersburg, MD: NIST. Accessed 2025-01-01. ↗
Spectral Database for Organic Structure Determination (SDBS). 2024. National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Japan. Accessed 2025-01-01. ↗
Ulrich, Eldon L., Hideo Akutsu, John F. Doreleijers, Yoko Harano, Yannis E. Ioannidis, Jundong Lin, Miron Livny, et al. 2008. "BioMagResBank." Nucleic Acids Research 36 (D1): D402–D408. [DOI ↗]
Horai, Hisayuki, Masanori Arita, Shigehiko Kanaya, Yoshito Nihei, Tasuku Ikeda, Kazuhiro Suwa, Yuya Ojima, et al. 2010. "MassBank: A Public Repository for Sharing Mass Spectral Data for Life Sciences." Journal of Mass Spectrometry 45 (7): 703–714. [DOI ↗]
Linstrom, P.J., and W.G. Mallard, eds. 2024. NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. ↗
McDonald, M. Shane, Mike McAvoy, and Ajit Bhalerao. 1988. "JCAMP-DX: A Standard Form for Exchange of Infrared Spectra in Computer Readable Form." Applied Spectroscopy 42 (1): 151–162. [DOI ↗]
PubChem. 2024. "PubChem Compound Database." National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. Accessed 2025-01-01. ↗
📊Bazy widm spektroskopowych — dane inline9 źródeł
Widma pobierane na żądanie z 9 źródeł. Każde widmo jest zapisywane w naszej bazie — kolejne otwarcie = zero zapytania do zewnętrznego API. Pobierz JCAMP-DX / CSV / PNG przy każdym widmie bez szukania.
Dane pobierane są jednorazowo (parser JCAMP-DX) i zapisywane w lokalnej bazie wtyczki. Zero duplikatów pobrań, zero zapytań do NIST przy kolejnych otwarciach. Licencje przestrzegane (publikowany tylko deep-link + własna wizualizacja).
Dane pobierane na żywo z wielu źródeł (priority-chain). JCAMP-DX / CSV / PNG dostępne do pobrania pod każdym widmem.
IR — Fourier-transform infrared
Ładowanie IR — Fourier-transform infrared…
MS — Mass spectrometry (EI 70eV)
Ładowanie MS — Mass spectrometry (EI 70eV)…
🧮 Porównanie DFT vs eksperyment (IR)
Nakładka eksperymentalnego widma IR na obliczone teoretycznie metodą B3LYP/6-31G* (czynnik skalujący 0.9614, Scott & Radom 1996).
Eksperyment DFT (theoretical)
Pełne dane teoretyczne (geometria, częstości): NIST CCCBDB ↗
📚 Bibliografia (Chicago)
Becke, Axel D. 1993. "Density-Functional Thermochemistry. III. The Role of Exact Exchange." Journal of Chemical Physics 98 (7): 5648–5652. Definicja funkcjonału B3LYP.
Scott, Anthony P., and Leo Radom. 1996. "Harmonic Vibrational Frequencies: An Evaluation of Hartree–Fock, Møller–Plesset, Quadratic Configuration Interaction, Density Functional Theory, and Semiempirical Scale Factors." Journal of Physical Chemistry 100 (41): 16502–16513. Współczynniki skalujące dla DFT (np. 0.9614 dla B3LYP/6-31G*).
Merrick, Jeffrey P., Damian Moran, and Leo Radom. 2007. "An Evaluation of Harmonic Vibrational Frequency Scale Factors." Journal of Physical Chemistry A 111 (45): 11683–11700. Aktualizacja Scott & Radom — scale factors dla nowszych funkcjonałów DFT.
Lee, Chengteh, Weitao Yang, and Robert G. Parr. 1988. "Development of the Colle-Salvetti Correlation-Energy Formula into a Functional of the Electron Density." Physical Review B 37 (2): 785–789. Korelacja LYP — uzupełnienie Becke 1993 dla B3LYP.
Hehre, Warren J., Robert Ditchfield, and John A. Pople. 1972. "Self-Consistent Molecular Orbital Methods. XII. Further Extensions of Gaussian-Type Basis Sets." Journal of Chemical Physics 56 (5): 2257–2261. Definicja bazy 6-31G* (split-valence + polaryzacja).
Johnson, Russell D., III, ed. 2022. "NIST Computational Chemistry Comparison and Benchmark Database (CCCBDB)." NIST Standard Reference Database 101, Release 22. https://cccbdb.nist.gov. Benchmark dla wartości teoretycznych — fallback link w widget.
Cramer, Christopher J. 2004. "Essentials of Computational Chemistry: Theories and Models." 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley. Podręcznik metod DFT i obliczeń częstości drgań.
Jensen, Frank. 2017. "Introduction to Computational Chemistry." 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley. Modern computational chemistry — bazy + metody dla widm wibracyjnych.
Foresman, James B., and Æleen Frisch. 2015. "Exploring Chemistry with Electronic Structure Methods." 3rd ed. Wallingford, CT: Gaussian, Inc. Praktyczny przewodnik Gaussian — IR + Raman + NMR z DFT.
🎓 Przewodnik interpretacji widm (dla studentów)
Wyjaśnienia każdego pasma w widmie — dlaczego pojawia się tam, gdzie się pojawia, i co świadczy o strukturze.
IR (infrared) (6 pików)
Widmo IR (infrared) zawiera 6 zidentyfikowanych strukturalnie pasm (z 10 wykrytych łącznie: 4 poza rozpoznawanymi zakresami). Poniższa analiza tłumaczy, co każde z nich znaczy strukturalnie i dlaczego pojawia się w danym zakresie.
C–H stretch (=C–H, aromatic)CH_arom● high
Pasmo "C–H stretch (=C–H, aromatic)" pojawia się w przypadkach: 3,042.0 cm⁻¹ (słabe (w)), 3,082.0 cm⁻¹ (słabe (w)). C–H przy pierścieniu aromatycznym (sp²) — zawsze powyżej 3000 cm⁻¹, w odróżnieniu od alkilowych C–H.
C–H bend (CH3, CH2 — methyl/methylene)CH3/CH2● high
Pasmo "C–H bend (CH3, CH2 — methyl/methylene)" pojawia się w przypadkach: 1,450.0 cm⁻¹ (słabe (w)). To rozciąganie alifatycznych C–H sp³. Obecne praktycznie w każdym związku organicznym z łańcuchem alkilowym.
C–H out-of-plane bend (aromatic substitution pattern)aromatic_sub● medium
Pasmo "C–H out-of-plane bend (aromatic substitution pattern)" pojawia się w przypadkach: 698.0 cm⁻¹ (silne (s)), 762.0 cm⁻¹ (słabe (w)), 810.0 cm⁻¹ (słabe (w)). Grupa funkcyjna identyfikowana jest na podstawie charakterystycznego zakresu (Pavia/Silverstein) — dokładny mechanizm fizyczny zależy od najbliższych sąsiadów chemicznych.
📚 Bibliografia (Chicago)
Field, Leslie D., Sev Sternhell, and John R. Kalman. 2013. "Organic Structures from Spectra." 5th ed. Chichester: Wiley. Studencki problem-set podręcznik (interpretation guide companion).
Williams, Dudley H., and Ian Fleming. 2008. "Spectroscopic Methods in Organic Chemistry." 6th ed. London: McGraw-Hill. Klasyk narratywnej interpretacji widm — wyjaśnia "dlaczego pik tu".
Crews, Phillip, Jaime Rodríguez, and Marcel Jaspars. 2009. "Organic Structure Analysis." 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press. Workflow strukturalnej interpretacji wieloparametrycznej.
McLafferty, Fred W., and František Tureček. 1993. "Interpretation of Mass Spectra." 4th ed. Mill Valley, CA: University Science Books. Mechanizmy fragmentacji MS — McLafferty rearrangement, m/z 29 = CHO.
Reusch, William. 2013. "Virtual Textbook of Organic Chemistry: Spectroscopy." East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University. https://www2.chemistry.msu.edu/faculty/reusch/VirtTxtJml/Spectrpy/spectro.htm. Otwarty dydaktyczny przewodnik po IR/NMR/MS/UV — ideal do wyjaśnień grup funkcyjnych.
Hesse, Manfred, Herbert Meier, and Bernd Zeeh. 2007. "Spektroskopische Methoden in der organischen Chemie." 8th ed. Stuttgart: Thieme. Niemiecki standardowy podręcznik interpretacji widm.
Lampman, Gary M., Donald L. Pavia, George S. Kriz, and James R. Vyvyan. 2010. "Spectroscopy." 4th ed. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning. Workbook ze sklejonymi narracjami interpretacyjnymi.
Kalsi, P. S. 2010. "Spectroscopy of Organic Compounds." 6th ed. New Delhi: New Age International. Kompletny podręcznik interpretacji widm IR/NMR/MS/UV.
🔎 Wyszukiwanie po widmie (JCAMP-DX)
Wgraj plik JCAMP-DX (.jdx, .dx, .jcm) — system policzy podobieństwo cosinusowe do wszystkich widm w bazie i pokaże TOP 10 dopasowań.
📚 Bibliografia (Chicago)
McLafferty, Fred W., ed. 2018. Wiley Registry of Mass Spectral Data. 11th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Referencyjna biblioteka MS (~775k widm).
Stein, Stephen E., and Donald R. Scott. 1994. "Optimization and Testing of Mass Spectral Library Search Algorithms for Compound Identification." Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 5 (9): 859–866. Algorytm cosine + dot-product NIST MS Search.
McDonald, Robert S., and Paul A. Wilks Jr. 1988. "JCAMP-DX: A Standard Form for Exchange of Infrared Spectra in Computer Readable Form." Applied Spectroscopy 42 (1): 151–162. Specyfikacja JCAMP-DX (rozszerzona do 5.01 dla NMR/MS).
McLafferty, Fred W., and František Tureček. 1993. "Interpretation of Mass Spectra." 4th ed. Mill Valley, CA: University Science Books. Cosine similarity matching i fragmentacja MS — fundament algorytmu wyszukiwania.
Sumner, Lloyd W., Alexander Amberg, Dave Barrett, Michael H. Beale, Richard Beger, Clare A. Daykin, Teresa W.-M. Fan, et al. 2007. "Proposed Minimum Reporting Standards for Chemical Analysis." Metabolomics 3 (3): 211–221. MSI Level 1-4 — standardy poziomu pewności dopasowania widmowego.
Stein, Stephen E. 1999. "An Integrated Method for Spectrum Extraction and Compound Identification from Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry Data." Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 10 (8): 770–781. Algorytm AMDIS — dekonwolucja + library match (NIST).
Lindon, John C., George E. Tranter, and David W. Koppenaal, eds. 2017. "Encyclopedia of Spectroscopy and Spectrometry." 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Academic Press. Encyklopedyczne hasła dot. spectral library searching.
Smith, Brian C. 2011. "Fundamentals of Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy." 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. FT-IR i format JCAMP-DX dla widm transmisyjnych.
Larkin, Peter. 2017. "Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy: Principles and Spectral Interpretation." 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Principles of IR/Raman library matching i preprocessing peakow.
Wlasciwosci strukturalne
Ladowanie danych strukturalnych...
❓ Najczęstsze pytania (3)
What is 100-44-7?
100-44-7 (CAS 100-44-7) is a chemical compound. The chemical data comes from PubChem (National Institutes of Health, USA).
Pomocne?
What is the CAS number of 100-44-7?
The CAS number for 100-44-7 is 100-44-7. A CAS Registry Number is the standard identifier for a chemical substance in scientific literature and in trade.
Pomocne?
How should 100-44-7 be stored?
100-44-7 should be stored as its safety data sheet directs \— typically in a dry, cool, well-ventilated place, away from heat and from materials it is incompatible with.
Pomocne?
➕ Zaproponuj pytanie
Pobierz pliki struktury
Pliki struktury molekularnej z bazy PubChem (NIH). Kompatybilne z programami: Avogadro, PyMOL, Jmol, ChemDraw.
Cohen ER, Cvitaš T, Frey JG, Holmström B, Kuchitsu K, Marquardt R, Mills I, Pavese F, Quack M, Stohner J, Strauss HL, Takami M, Thor AJ (2007)
g/L ↔ molarity
c (mol/L) = (g/L) / MW
±0.1% (depends on MW precision)
Cohen ER, Cvitaš T, Frey JG, Holmström B, Kuchitsu K, Marquardt R, Mills I, Pavese F, Quack M, Stohner J, Strauss HL, Takami M, Thor AJ (2007)
mmol/L ↔ molarity
c (mol/L) = mmol/L × 10⁻³
Exact
Cohen ER, Cvitaš T, Frey JG, Holmström B, Kuchitsu K, Marquardt R, Mills I, Pavese F, Quack M, Stohner J, Strauss HL, Takami M, Thor AJ (2007)
Celsius ↔ Kelvin
T(K) = t(°C) + 273.15
±0.01 K (ITS-90 scale)
BIPM (Bureau International des Poids et Mesures) (2019)
Celsius ↔ Fahrenheit
T(°F) = T(°C) × 9/5 + 32
±0.1 °F
Thompson A, Taylor BN (2008)
density-corrected % ↔ molarity
c (mol/L) = (%w/w × ρ × 10) / MW, ρ in g/mL
±0.1% when ρ known to 3 decimals
Cohen ER, Cvitaš T, Frey JG, Holmström B, Kuchitsu K, Marquardt R, Mills I, Pavese F, Quack M, Stohner J, Strauss HL, Takami M, Thor AJ (2007)
📚 Bibliografia (8 źródeł autorytatywnych)
Thompson A, Taylor BN (2008). Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI). NIST Special Publication 811 · DOI: 10.6028/NIST.SP.811-2008 → Primary SI standard for US scientific usage
Cohen ER, Cvitaš T, Frey JG, Holmström B, Kuchitsu K, Marquardt R, Mills I, Pavese F, Quack M, Stohner J, Strauss HL, Takami M, Thor AJ (2007). Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry — The IUPAC Green Book. RSC Publishing, 3rd ed. · DOI: 10.1039/9781847557889 · ISBN: 978-0-85404-433-7 → Canonical IUPAC guide for chemistry quantities/units
BIPM (Bureau International des Poids et Mesures) (2019). The International System of Units (SI), 9th edition. BIPM · ↗ → International SI definitions (incl. redefined kilogram 2019)
ISO/IEC (2022). Quantities and units — Part 1: General. International Organization for Standardization — ISO 80000-1:2022 · ↗ → General rules for physical quantities and units
ISO/IEC (2019). Quantities and units — Part 9: Physical chemistry and molecular physics. International Organization for Standardization — ISO 80000-9:2019 · ↗ → Concentration / molality / amount-of-substance conventions
Tiesinga E, Mohr PJ, Newell DB, Taylor BN (2021). CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2018. Rev. Mod. Phys. 93(2):025010 · DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.93.025010 → Avogadro, gas constant, molar volume (2019 SI revision)
IUPAC (2019). Compendium of Chemical Terminology — the IUPAC Gold Book (online). IUPAC · DOI: 10.1351/goldbook → Definitions of mass fraction, molality, normality, ppm, activity
Mills IM, Cvitaš T, Homann K, Kallay N, Kuchitsu K (1988). Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry. Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1st ed. · ISBN: 0-632-01773-5 → Historical predecessor of IUPAC Green Book
Podobne struktury molekularne
Ladowanie podobnych struktur...
Wyjasnienia naukowe
Automatycznie wygenerowane wyjasnienia na podstawie wlasciwosci molekularnych i oznaczen GHS. Zrodlo: dane PubChem + klasyfikacja CLP/GHS.
Substancja rakotworcza
Czasteczka lub jej metabolity moga inicjowac lub promowac procesy nowotworzenia. Mechanizmy: uszkodzenie DNA, zaburzenie regulacji cyklu komorkowego, stres oksydacyjny. Klasyfikacja IARC/CLP kat. 1A/1B.
Informacja o ograniczeniach danych. Informacje dotyczące bezpieczeństwa zawarte na tej stronie mają charakter informacyjny i nie zastępują pełnej karty charakterystyki (SDS). Przed użyciem produktu zapoznaj się z aktualną kartą charakterystyki producenta oraz wytycznymi GHS/CLP. Klasyfikacja CLP dotyczy czystej substancji bulk, nie preparatów handlowych.
Klasyfikacja GHS/CLP — Rozporządzenie (WE) nr 1272/2008 + UN GHS Rev. 9 (2021).
⚠️ Niebezpieczeństwo (Danger)
🧪GHS05Żrące☠GHS06Toksyczne❗GHS07Drażniące / szkodliwe🫁GHS08Zagrożenie dla zdrowia
🚨 Zwroty wskazujące rodzaj zagrożenia (H)
H350 — Może powodować raka
H331 — Działa toksycznie w następstwie wdychania
H302 — Działa szkodliwie po połknięciu
H335 — Może powodować podrażnienie dróg oddechowych
H373 — Może powodować uszkodzenie narządów poprzez długotrwałe lub powtarzane narażenie
H315 — Działa drażniąco na skórę
H318 — Powoduje poważne uszkodzenie oczu
🛡 Zwroty określające środki ostrożności (P)
P203 — Przed użyciem uzyskać, przeczytać i postępować zgodnie ze wszystkimi instrukcjami dotyczącymi bezpieczeństwa
✓ Klasyfikacja zharmonizowana zgodnie z załącznikiem VI do rozporządzenia CLP (WE) 1272/2008 (klasyfikacja urzędowa, wiążąca). Numer indeksowy: 602-037-00-3.
Referencja (Chicago): European Chemicals Agency. "α-chlorotoluene; benzyl chloride, Index No. 602-037-00-3." In Table 3 of Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP Regulation), 23rd Adaptation to Technical Progress (harmonised list as of 2026-07-07). Helsinki: European Chemicals Agency, 2026. https://echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals/annex-vi-to-clp.
Tłumaczenia: Rozporządzenie CLP (WE) 1272/2008, Załącznik III i IV. Dane: PubChem/NLM.
☢️ Dane toksykologiczne (IARC + EPA CTX)
🧬 Klasyfikacja rakotwórczości IARC
Klasyfikacja IARC:
⚠️ Brak indywidualnego wpisu IARC dla tego CAS
UWAGA: substancja sklasyfikowana jako rakotwórcza wg ECHA CLP (Carc. 1B, H350) — patrz sekcja CMR poniżej. Brak monografii IARC nie oznacza braku rakotwórczości.
📚 Źródła · Bibliografia (Chicago Notes-Bibliography)
Maria M. Palaiologou, Ioanna E. Molinou. (1995). "Excess Volumes of Ethyl Acetate + Toluene, + o-Chlorotoluene, and + p-Chlorotoluene from 283.15 to 303.15 K". Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. https://doi.org/10.1021/je00020a031 [DOI]
B. Busa Goud, P. Venkatesu, M. V. Prabhakara Rao. (1995). "Excess Volumes of 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane or Tetrachloroethene + 2-Chlorotoluene, + 3-Chlorotoluene, and + 4-Chlorotoluene at 303.15 and 313.15 K". Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. https://doi.org/10.1021/je00022a013 [DOI]
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). 2024. "IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans." Lyon: IARC. 🔗
U.S. EPA. 2024. "ECOTOX Knowledgebase." Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 🔗
ECHA. 2024. "Chemical Safety Assessment." European Chemicals Agency. 🔗
U.S. National Toxicology Program. 2024. Report on Carcinogens. 15th ed. Research Triangle Park, NC: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. 🔗
GESTIS. 2024. "GESTIS Substance Database." Institute for Occupational Safety and Health of the German Social Accident Insurance (DGUV). 🔗
U.S. EPA. 2024. "CompTox Chemicals Dashboard." Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 🔗
ECHA. 2023. "Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP), Annex VI — Harmonised Classification." European Chemicals Agency. 🔗
Leist, Marcel, et al. 2014. "Consensus Report on the Future of Animal-Free Systemic Toxicity Testing." ALTEX 31 (3): 341–356. [DOI]
Hartung, Thomas. 2009. "Toxicology for the Twenty-First Century." Nature 460 (7252): 208–212. [DOI]
Lenga, Robert E., ed. 2008. The Sigma-Aldrich Library of Chemical Safety Data. 2nd ed. Milwaukee: Sigma-Aldrich.
Slikker, William Jr., et al. 2004. "Dose-Dependent Terminal and Tissue Residues After Chronic Exposure." Toxicological Sciences 81 (2): 253–279. [DOI]
Calabrese, Edward J., and Linda A. Baldwin. 2003. "Toxicology Rethinks Its Central Belief." Nature 421 (6924): 691–692. [DOI]
Hodge, Harold C., and J. Harvey Sterner. 1949. "Tabulation of Toxicity Classes." American Industrial Hygiene Association Quarterly 10 (4): 93–96. [DOI]
CAS 100-44-7GHS:H350H331H302H335H373H315H318⚠️ EWAKUACJA (10m)💨 Wentylacja
🥽 PPE — Środki ochrony osobistej
Gogle:Tak
Kombinezon:fartuch laboratoryjny
Ochrona dróg oddechowych:filtr typ A2-P3 (pary organiczne + cząstki) — EN 14387:2004+A1:2008
📦 Małe rozlanie (<1L) — absorbent: obojętny mineralny / odkurzacz z filtrem HEPA (dla pyłów)
⚠️ Procedura GENERYCZNA wyprowadzona z klasyfikacji GHS (brak danych kuratorskich dla tego CAS). Zawsze stosuj aktualną Kartę Charakterystyki (SDS) dostawcy.
1. Ogranicz dostęp osób; wentyluj.
2. PPE odporne + ochrona dróg oddechowych (pył: półmaska P2/P3; pary: wg SDS).
3. Zbieraj mechanicznie do szczelnego, oznakowanego pojemnika; minimalizuj pylenie/parowanie.
4. Przemyj teren wodą; pozostałości i absorbent traktuj jak odpad niebezpieczny.
Dodatkowe właściwości z GHS:
• działanie na zdrowie (CMR / STOT / aspiracja) — minimalizuj ekspozycję
• drażniące — unikaj kontaktu ze skórą/oczami i wdychania pyłu
🛢️ Duże rozlanie (>1L) ⚠️ Materiał niebezpieczny
1. Ewakuuj; wejście wyłącznie w pełnym PPE z ochroną dróg oddechowych.
2. Otamuj; unikaj wzbijania pyłu i rozpraszania substancji.
3. Zbierz mechanicznie do oznakowanego pojemnika UN; przekaż uprawnionej firmie (BDO).
4. Zgłoś incydent zgodnie z procedurą BHP; przy uwolnieniu do środowiska powiadom WIOŚ.
🩹 Pierwsza pomoc
🧴 Skóra
1. Zdejmij zanieczyszczoną odzież.
2. Spłucz skórę dużą ilością wody przez ≥15 min.
3. Substancja może wchłaniać się przez skórę — obserwuj objawy / lekarz.
👁️ Oczy
1. Płucz wodą ≥15 min, powieki rozwarte; soczewki wyjmij.
2. Okulista przy utrzymującym się podrażnieniu.
🫁 Wdychanie
1. Wyprowadź na świeże powietrze, pozycja wygodna.
2. Przy duszności — tlen / lekarz.
🍽️ Połknięcie
1. Wypłucz usta wodą; NIE wywołuj wymiotów.
2. Centrum Zatruć: +48 42 631 47 24.
🌍 Środowisko:
Woda: Średnia; Gleba: Niska; ❌ Nie wpuszczać do kanalizacji; Kod odpadu: 16 05 06*
📚 Naukowe referencje (Chicago Author-Date) — 8
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). 2020. Guidance on the Compilation of Safety Data Sheets — Section 6: Accidental Release Measures. ECHA.
[link ↗]
European Parliament and Council. 2008. Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP) — Hazard classes and H-statements. Official Journal of the European Union L 353.
[link ↗]
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 2023. Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards — NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. CDC.
[link ↗]
U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. 2024. 29 CFR 1910.120 — Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response (HAZWOPER). U.S. Code of Federal Regulations.
[link ↗]
National Fire Protection Association. 2018. NFPA 472: Standard for Competence of Responders to Hazardous Materials/Weapons of Mass Destruction Incidents. NFPA.
[link ↗]
European Parliament and Council. 2012. Directive 2012/18/EU on the Control of Major-Accident Hazards Involving Dangerous Substances (Seveso III). Official Journal of the European Union L 197: 1–37.
[link ↗]
U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. 2024. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[link ↗]
European Chemicals Agency. 2020. Guidance on the Compilation of Safety Data Sheets (SDS), Version 3.1. ECHA.
[link ↗]
Źródła: Klasyfikacja GHS/CLP (PubChem/SDS) — fallback generyczny · ECHA Guidance on SDS (sek. 6) · NIOSH Pocket Guide.
Dane orientacyjne — w sytuacji awaryjnej zawsze stosuj instrukcje dostawcy + lokalne przepisy BHP.
☠️ Wizualny przewodnik PPE (środki ochrony indywidualnej)Toksyczne
🧤 Rękawice
Nitryl podwójny (double-glove) >0.2 mm (każda warstwa) EN 374-1 typ B
Wymiana co 30 min lub natychmiast po kontakcie
👁️ Okulary / gogle
EN 166 B
Pełna ochrona boczna; gogle uszczelnione (sealed) dla pyłów toksycznych
🥼 Fartuch / kombinezon
Pełny lab coat zapinany + jednorazowe rękawy EN 13688
Stężenie w powietrzu < OEL (NDS) per Dz.U. 2024 poz. 1017
😷 Maska oddechowa wymagana
Półmaska P2 (drobne aerozole) lub P3 (>10× OEL); maska pełna z filtrem A1B1E1K1-P3 dla par organicznych toksycznych
📚 Naukowe referencje (Chicago Author-Date)
European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2016. EN 374-1:2016 — Protective gloves against dangerous chemicals and micro-organisms — Part 1: Terminology and performance requirements for chemical risks. CEN, Brussels. EN 374-1:2016. [link ↗] — Klasyfikacja rękawic chemoodpornych typ A/B/C; testy permeacji JKLPT
European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2001. EN 166:2001 — Personal eye-protection — Specifications. CEN, Brussels. EN 166:2001. [link ↗] — Markings: B = średnia energia uderzenia, T = ekstremalne temp., 9 = stopione metale i ciała stałe
European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2009. EN 14605:2005+A1:2009 — Protective clothing against liquid chemicals — Performance requirements for clothing with liquid-tight (Type 3) or spray-tight (Type 4) connections. CEN, Brussels. EN 14605:2009. [link ↗] — Type 3 (jet-tight) i Type 4 (spray-tight) ochrona przed cieczowymi chemikaliami
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 2017. Recommendations for Chemical Protective Clothing: A Companion to the NIOSH Pocket Guide. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services / CDC. [link ↗] — Praktyczny przewodnik doboru CPC per substancja i scenariusz ekspozycji
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). 2011. Personal Protective Equipment — General requirements. U.S. Department of Labor — 29 CFR 1910.132. 29 CFR 1910.132. [link ↗] — Pracodawca musi zapewnić PPE + szkolenie + hazard assessment udokumentowane na piśmie
📋 Zgodność regulacyjna (compliance checklist)Toksyczny4 wymagane12 pozycji
ℹ️ Lista kontrolna obowiązków regulacyjnych dla CAS 100-44-7.
Status oparty na: ADR 2025 (Tabela A), REACH Załącznik XVII, CLP Załącznik VI (klasyfikacja zharmonizowana), hazard class z m14-spill DB, SVHC, GIS oraz NDS PL. Zasada: brak danych = brak twierdzenia (NIE deklarujemy „braku ograniczeń" bez podstawy).
✅SDS (Karta Charakterystyki) dostępnaspełnione
Jak zapewnić zgodność: Wymóg: aktualna SDS zgodna z Rozp. 1907/2006 (REACH) Aneks II, format 16-sekcyjny.
Jak zapewnić zgodność: Etykieta musi zawierać: piktogramy GHS, słowo sygnałowe (Niebezpieczeństwo/Uwaga), zwroty H (zagrożenia) i P (środki ostrożności), dane producenta. Wymagane od 2010 (substancje) i 2015 (mieszaniny). Dla tej substancji obowiązuje KLASYFIKACJA ZHARMONIZOWANA (CLP zał. VI) — patrz niżej; jest nadrzędna nad samoklasyfikacją.
Jak zapewnić zgodność: Pracownicy laboratoryjni: szkolenie wstępne (instruktaż ogólny + stanowiskowy) + okresowe co 5 lat (lub co 3 dla pracowników na stanowiskach inżynieryjno-technicznych). Dokumentacja w aktach osobowych.
Jak zapewnić zgodność: Klasyfikacja GHS tej substancji wskazuje właściwości, które mogą czynić powstały z niej odpad niebezpiecznym (rozp. 1357/2014, właściwości HP — z progami stężeniowymi liczonymi od zawartości w odpadzie, nie w odczynniku). Czy powstaje z tego obowiązek ewidencji w BDO, zależy od wytwórcy odpadu i skali działalności (art. 50 ustawy o odpadach; zwolnienia m.in. do 100 kg/rok odpadów niebezpiecznych). Nie jest to stwierdzenie obowiązku dla kupującego.
Podstawa prawna: Ustawa z 14 grudnia 2012 r. o odpadach (Dz.U. 2013 poz. 21)
❓ADR transport (umowa międzynarodowa)do weryfikacji
Jak zapewnić zgodność: Brak danych ADR w zbiorze MOL-GOD dla tego numeru CAS. NIE zakładaj braku ograniczeń — przed wysyłką zweryfikuj klasyfikację transportową w ADR 2025 (Tabela A) oraz w sekcji 14 karty charakterystyki (SDS).
Podstawa prawna: Umowa europejska ADR 2025 + Ustawa z 19 sierpnia 2011 r. o przewozie towarów niebezpiecznych
Jak zapewnić zgodność: Importerzy/producenci ≥1 tony/rok muszą zarejestrować substancję w ECHA (dossier techniczne + Chemical Safety Report jeśli ≥10 t). Sprawdź ECHA Annex VI / registered substances list.
▣REACH Załącznik XVII (ograniczenia stosowania/marketingu)wymagane
Jak zapewnić zgodność: Substancja objęta ograniczeniem REACH Załącznik XVII (poz. 28–30): CMR kat. 1A/1B — zakaz sprzedaży ogółowi społeczeństwa (obrót wyłącznie profesjonalny). Sprawdź warunki wprowadzania do obrotu/stosowania oraz komunikat w SDS sek. 15.
❓NDS — Najwyższe Dopuszczalne Stężenie w środowisku pracydo weryfikacji
Jak zapewnić zgodność: Brak danych NDS w zbiorze MOL-GOD (zbiór niepełny — ~41 z ~600 substancji wykazu). Nieobecność NIE oznacza braku NDS — sprawdź pełny wykaz Dz.U. 2024 poz. 1017 (Rozp. MRiPS z 4 września 2024 r.), a w razie braku stosuj OEL z dyrektyw EU lub zalecane przez NIOSH/ACGIH.
Podstawa prawna: Rozp. MRiPS z 4 września 2024 r. (Dz.U. 2024 poz. 1017) — NDS i NDSCh
Jak zapewnić zgodność: Nie figuruje w dostępnym zbiorze roboczym prekursorów (lista niepełna). Nieobecność NIE jest potwierdzeniem — zweryfikuj wobec zał. I Rozp. (WE) 273/2004 i wykazu GIS przed obrotem.
Podstawa prawna: Rozp. (WE) 273/2004 + Ustawa o przeciwdziałaniu narkomanii (Dz.U. 2005 nr 179 poz. 1485)
European Parliament and Council. 2008. Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (CLP). Official Journal of the European Union L 353/1. CLP Regulation 1272/2008. [link ↗] — Klasyfikacja, oznakowanie i pakowanie substancji + mieszanin (GHS implementation w UE)
European Parliament and Council. 2006. Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH). Official Journal of the European Union L 396/1. REACH Regulation 1907/2006. [link ↗] — REACH — rejestracja, ocena i autoryzacja chemikaliów; SVHC; SDS Aneks II
Ministerstwo Rodziny i Polityki Społecznej Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. 2024. Rozporządzenie Ministra Rodziny i Polityki Społecznej z dnia 4 września 2024 r. w sprawie najwyższych dopuszczalnych stężeń i natężeń czynników szkodliwych dla zdrowia w środowisku pracy. Dziennik Ustaw RP 2024 poz. 1017. [link ↗] — NDS i NDSCh dla ~600 substancji chemicznych — aktualne polskie limity ekspozycji zawodowej
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). 2025. European Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR), 2025 Edition. United Nations, Geneva. ADR 2025. [link ↗] — Międzynarodowa umowa drogowego transportu towarów niebezpiecznych — UN numbers, klasy, opakowania
📚 Skonsolidowane referencje naukowe — Chicago Author-Date 10 źródeł
Referencje zebrane ze wszystkich zakładek Safety Hub. CAS: 100-44-7 ·
PubChem ↗
Parlament Europejski i Rada UE. 2008. "Rozporządzenie (WE) nr 1272/2008 w sprawie klasyfikacji, oznakowania i pakowania substancji (CLP)." Dz.Urz. UE L 353. [↗]
GHS, Regulacje
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). 2021. "Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS), Ninth Revised Edition." United Nations, Geneva. [↗]
GHS
Goldfrank, Lewis R., Robert S. Hoffman, Mary Ann Howland, et al.. 2019. "Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 11th ed.." McGraw-Hill Education, New York. ISBN 978-1-25-985961-8.
Pierwsza pomoc, Toksykologia
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 2023. "NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards (DHHS Publ. 2005-149)." U.S. Department of Health and Human Services / CDC, Cincinnati, OH. [↗]
Pierwsza pomoc, PPE, Toksykologia
European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2016. "EN 374-1:2016 — Protective gloves against dangerous chemicals and micro-organisms." CEN, Brussels. [↗]
PPE
UNECE. 2023. "European Agreement Concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR 2025)." United Nations, Geneva. [↗]
Utylizacja, Regulacje
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). 2022. "NFPA 400 — Hazardous Materials Code." NFPA, Quincy, MA. [↗]
Magazynowanie
Urben, P.G. (ed.). 2017. "Bretherick's Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards, 8th ed.." Butterworth-Heinemann / Elsevier, Oxford. [↗]
Magazynowanie
Ministerstwo Klimatu i Środowiska RP. 2023. "Baza danych o produktach i opakowaniach oraz o gospodarce odpadami (BDO)." Ministerstwo Klimatu i Środowiska, Warszawa. [↗]
Utylizacja
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC / WHO). 2024. "IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans — List of Classifications." WHO, Lyon. [↗]
Toksykologia
Zakładki z własnymi referencjami (Emergency, PPE, Storage, Waste) zawierają dodatkowe pozycje bibliograficzne wewnątrz swoich sekcji.
Wklej serię powtórzeń pomiarów (CSV lub po jednej liczbie w linii). Kalkulator policzy średnią, odchylenie, 95% CI, wykryje outliery (Grubbs + Dixon Q).
Separator: przecinek, spacja, tab, nowa linia. Min 3 pomiary.
Zaplanuj cały projekt laboratoryjny: dodaj eksperymenty z reagentami, powtórzeniami i czasem trwania. Otrzymasz wykres Gantta, listę zakupów (linki do sklepu!), budżet z 10% marginesem i macierz ryzyka GHS.
💡 Zaloguj się, aby zapisywać projekty.
Bez logowania możesz kalkulować, ale nie zapisać.
🧪 Rozpuszczalność i kompatybilność z solwentami
Molekuła
Benzyl Chloride
Wzór
C7H7Cl
logP (XLogP3)
2.30
Masa (g/mol)
126.58
Polarność
Hydrofobowa (niepolarna)
⚠️ Estymacja GC (Hoftyzer-Van Krevelen). Brak danych literaturowych HSP dla tego CAS — precyzja ±2 MPa½. Weryfikuj eksperymentalnie.
Solwent
Kompat.
Ra
Wizual
GC-MS
HPLC
Zastosowania
Referencje
Ra < R₀ = good miscibility · Ra < 1,5×R₀ = borderline · above = poor (R₀ — radius of the Hansen sphere of this molecule) For this molecule R₀ = 8..
Teoria rozpuszczalności (zastosowane w przewidywaniu kompatybilności):
Yalkowsky, Samuel H., and Shri C. Valvani. 1980. "Solubility and Partitioning I: Solubility of Nonelectrolytes in Water." Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 69 (8): 912–922. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600690814 — General Solubility Equation (GSE): logS = 0.5 − logP − 0.01(MP−25).
Hansen, Charles M. 2007. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook. 2nd ed. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420006834 — HSP triplet (dD, dP, dH) + wzór Ra.
Stefanis, E., and C. Panayiotou. 2008. "Prediction of Hansen Solubility Parameters with a New Group-Contribution Method." Int J Thermophys 29: 568–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-008-0415-z
Reichardt, Christian, and Thomas Welton. 2011. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry. 4th ed. Wiley-VCH. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527632220 — E_T(30) polarity scale, solwatochromia.
Snyder, Lloyd R., Joseph J. Kirkland, and John W. Dolan. 2010. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470508183 — Eluotropic series, polarity index.
Van Krevelen, D. W., and K. Te Nijenhuis. 2009. Properties of Polymers. 4th ed. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-054819-7.X0001-5 — Hoftyzer–Van Krevelen group contribution dla dD/dP/dH z SMILES.
Marcus, Yizhak. 1998. The Properties of Solvents. Wiley Series in Solution Chemistry, Vol. 4. ISBN 9780471983699 — Kompletny tabularny zestaw 250+ rozpuszczalników (ε, μ, donicity, acceptor numbers).
PubChem Compound Database — CAS 100-44-7 lookup ↗ — logP (XLogP3), water solubility experimental + predicted.
Kompletna bibliografia w akordeonie REFERENCJE (na dole strony) — Chicago Manual of Style 17th ed., Author-Date.
🧮 Kalkulator rozpuszczalności
Rozpuszczalność:—
logS:—
Metoda:—
⚠️ —
Rozpuszczalność vs Temperatura
🌐 Hansen Solubility Sphere (3D)
⚠️ The Hansen parameters for this substance fall outside the range of the method.
At least one of the δD/δP/δH parameters fell outside the domain of validity of the group contribution method (Hoftyzer–Van Krevelen), so the position of the molecule in Hansen space is unknown. The distance Ra is measured FROM THAT POINT — it cannot be calculated without knowing the point. The sphere and the distance table have been omitted rather than filled with numbers that have nothing behind them. Where a solubility measurement exists, it is shown in the table below.
CAS, EC and molecular formula, resolved across the identifier systems a buyer uses. The count of systems resolved is shown, so you can see how well characterised this substance is rather than assuming.
Data
Every physicochemical value carries the source it came from and the date that source was read. Open any of them.
Classification
Read against the harmonised entry where one exists, with the index number stated. Self-classification is shown separately and labelled.
Regulatory
Inventory, restriction, authorisation and candidate-list status, each stated individually. Where a status is not established, this page says so — it never says no restrictions apply.
Documentation
Which documents exist, at what review level, in which languages, and when each was issued.
Supplier
Who is selling this, and what they have published about themselves.
Nothing on this page is a certification. It is a record you can audit.
Two guarantees, both with their limits stated
The Gap Report Guarantee
If the available evidence cannot support a defensible document for your CAS number and product specification, we will not invent the missing values. You receive a documented gap report and choose: a refund, store credit, or the report on its own.
A visible gap is worth more than a plausible number, because the plausible number is the one that fails when somebody checks it.
The Re-issue Promise
If a signed card is rejected by an authority or by a customer’s compliance officer on one of the points we checked and reported as passed, we re-issue it corrected at no charge and credit the original fee.
This covers the checks we performed and named. It does not cover registration status, tonnage, or your role in the supply chain — those are not ours to hold, and a guarantee that pretended otherwise would be worth nothing.
This page describes the regulatory documentation issued for α-chlorotoluene (CAS 100-44-7). The item supplied is a document, not the substance.
α-chlorotoluene (CAS 100-44-7) at a glance
Substance – α-chlorotoluene
CAS number – 100-44-7
EC number – 202-853-6
CLP Annex VI index number – 602-037-00-3
Also known as – benzyl chloride
Hazard statements – H350 (may cause cancer); H331 (toxic if inhaled); H302 (harmful if swallowed); H335 (may cause respiratory irritation); H373 (may cause damage to organs through prolonged or repeated exposure); H315 (causes skin irritation)
CMR classification – yes, classified as carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic for reproduction
Documentation issued – safety data sheet in REACH Annex II structure; working draft or signed card
What is supplied – a document. MolGod.org does not sell, supply or ship chemical substances.
What must the label for α-chlorotoluene contain?
The supply label for α-chlorotoluene is generated from the same classification that drives the safety data sheet: pictograms selected by precedence, one signal word derived from the highest hazard class present, and the hazard statements H350, H331, H302… reproduced in full. Where the container is too small to carry the complete set at a legible size, there are lawful ways to handle it and unlawful ones that look identical to a non-specialist.
Why a correct sheet stops being correct
Classification under CLP moves with each Adaptation to Technical Progress. A sheet for CAS 100-44-7 written before the amendment that touched its entry keeps stating a classification the register no longer holds. Nothing in the document announces this — it reads exactly as it did on the day it was issued, which is precisely why revision dates are checked before content.
Where is regulatory status recorded for α-chlorotoluene?
Section 15 documents the regulatory status for α-chlorotoluene, detailing its inclusion on candidate lists, whether it is subject to authorisation or restriction, along with any applicable national regulations. This information is frequently requested by downstream users; providing a concise summary in a single document eliminates repetitive email exchanges with each customer.
In which language must the SDS for α-chlorotoluene be supplied?
The documentation for α-chlorotoluene is limited by its original language. Translation in this context is not an editorial task; hazard statements must use their official wording in each language, as any rephrasing — even if accurate — would result in a document that no longer aligns with the required format. The phrasing is strictly defined and must be reproduced exactly, rather than being interpreted or adapted.
Disposal route and waste classification
Disposal of α-chlorotoluene and its packaging must comply with section 13 requirements. The substance is classified as posing an aquatic hazard, meaning it cannot be discharged into drains. The waste code assigned by the holder should reflect the hazard profile rather than convenience, ensuring proper management in accordance with regulatory guidelines.
Can I import α-chlorotoluene into the EU?
The introduction of α-chlorotoluene into the Union necessitates the preparation of documentation prior to logistical arrangements. The documentation file must be available at the time of import, not merely upon request; for this purpose, substances listed in CLP Annex VI is assessed within the context of regulated consignments. Index 602-037-00-3 establishes the classification that Section 2 must reflect accordingly.
What is the CLP classification of α-chlorotoluene?
The harmonised classification for CAS 100-44-7 carries 7 hazard statements: H350, H331, H302, H335, H373, H315, H318. In plain terms this means may cause cancer; toxic if inhaled; harmful if swallowed; may cause respiratory irritation. A harmonised entry is binding across the Union — an importer may not soften it, and a self-classification that diverges from it will not survive an enforcement check.
Is α-chlorotoluene classified as a CMR substance?
CAS 100-44-7 is classified as a CMR substance (H350). That status changes the obligations attached to every shipment: workplace exposure documentation, restrictions on supply to the general public, and substitution pressure from downstream users who must justify continued use. A safety data sheet for a CMR substance is read more closely than any other, because the classification itself invites scrutiny.
Which GHS pictograms apply to α-chlorotoluene?
The label for α-chlorotoluene carries GHS05 (corrosion), GHS06 (skull and crossbones), GHS08 (health hazard), with the signal word Danger. These are not chosen by the supplier: CLP Annex VI states them for CAS 100-44-7, and the precedence rules in Annex I decide which pictogram is dropped when two would say the same thing. A label showing a different set from the register is wrong even if every hazard statement on it is correct.
First-aid content and why it is read first
Section 4 covers first-aid measures for α-chlorotoluene by route of exposure: inhalation, skin, eye and ingestion, each answered separately. Generic advice to ‘seek medical attention’ in all four is the most common defect, and it is the one that matters at the moment somebody needs the sheet.
What do customs check when importing α-chlorotoluene?
When a consignment of α-chlorotoluene is stopped at the border, the document examined first is rarely the invoice. It is section 14 of the safety data sheet and its agreement with the transport papers. A missing packing group, an absent UN number or a proper shipping name that contradicts the classification of CAS 100-44-7 will hold the pallet regardless of how complete the remaining fifteen sections are.
Stability, reactivity and incompatibilities
Incompatibilities for α-chlorotoluene should be detailed under section 10 and must not conflict with the storage instructions provided in section 7. If a document lists a material as incompatible in one section while permitting its use in another, it is no longer considered valid.
How is α-chlorotoluene classified for road, sea and air transport?
Carriers and forwarders handling α-chlorotoluene compare section 14 against the shipping papers before loading. Any disagreement stops the consignment at the point where correcting it is most expensive.
Identifiers that must agree
The CAS 100-44-7 number and index number 602-037-00-3 are not interchangeable or decorative elements; they serve distinct purposes. The index number connects to the harmonised classification system, whereas the CAS number links to chemical literature. A document containing one without the other requires readers to independently reconstruct this relationship, which may lead to errors during reconstruction.
What is the EC number for α-chlorotoluene?
Alongside CAS 100-44-7, this substance carries EC number 202-853-6 and Annex VI index 602-037-00-3. European documentation is built around the EC number as often as around the CAS: registration dossiers, the candidate list and customs systems key on it. A safety data sheet quoting only one of the two forces every downstream reader to look up the other.
Questions about documentation for α-chlorotoluene
Can I check whether my existing sheet is still valid?
Yes. A section-by-section reading against Annex II and the current harmonised entry establishes that in one pass, and a sheet that passes is reported as passing.
Do I need a safety data sheet to import α-chlorotoluene into the EU?
Yes. A sheet compiled to Annex II of REACH must exist before the first consignment moves, and it must be held by the entity placing the substance on the Union market.
What is the CAS number of α-chlorotoluene?
CAS 100-44-7. In CLP Annex VI the same substance carries index number 602-037-00-3, and both identifiers should appear in the documentation.
Is α-chlorotoluene a CMR substance?
Yes. The harmonised classification places it among substances classified as carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic for reproduction, which changes workplace documentation and supply restrictions.
MolGod.org issues documentation and does not sell, supply or ship chemical substances. CAS 100-44-7 identifies the subject of this document.
Which version do you need?
📄
SDS Working Draft
€49.99
Delivered automatically after payment, by e-mail
Full 16-section REACH Annex II structure
Classification against ECHA CLP Annex VI
Public-source data with references
Unresolved gaps flagged, never filled by guesswork
For internal drafting and supplier review. Unsigned; supplier-specific fields may need completing.
Best for
Seeing what the document will contain before you commit
Comparing what a supplier sent you against the register
Finding the gaps in a sheet you already hold
Preparing an internal file before an export decision
Substances you handle but do not yet sell
Recommended when the document leaves your company✍
Expert-Reviewed SDS
€249.99
Everything in the Working Draft
Reviewed by a competent person under Annex II, section by section
Adapted to your company, product grade and identified use
Destination market and language checked
Transport section reviewed for the mode you request
Five rounds of corrections applied to your instructions
Within 72 hours of receiving complete input.
Best for
Any document that leaves your company
A customer or distributor who asked for the sheet
Paperwork travelling with an export shipment
A sheet an inspector or authority may read
Replacing a sheet a customer has already rejected
If you are unsure, read down the left column and stop at the first line that describes your situation.
What the document is for
Working Draft €49.99
Expert-Reviewed €249.99
Internal drafting and review
Yes
Yes
Checking a sheet a supplier sent you
Yes
Yes
Sent to your customer
Not written for this
Yes
Travels with an export shipment
Not written for this
Yes
Read by an inspector or authority
Not written for this
Yes
Adapted to your company, grade and identified use
No
Yes
Signed and dated by the reviewer
No
Yes
When you get it
Immediately after payment
Within 72 hours of complete input
Nothing stops you sending a draft to anyone. "Not written for this" means exactly that: it carries no signature and no fields adapted to your company, so it will not answer the questions the recipient is about to ask.
What the signature means
Who prepares the document
The document is generated by the MolGod engine from ECHA CLP Annex VI and the cited public sources, then read section by section by a qualified scientific reviewer with a degree in chemistry or a related scientific field.
What the review covers
The sheet is read section by section against the REACH Annex II structure. GHS classification and transport entries are checked against the sources cited in the document, and the sheet is adapted to the company, product grade and identified use you provide.
What is NOT verified
We do not test your material and we cannot confirm what is physically in your container: composition, concentration, impurities or manufacturing route. Those come from you and are reproduced as supplied.
What the signature is — and is not
The signature records that a qualified scientific reviewer read the document. It is not a government approval, not an ECHA approval, and not a legal certification — no such certification exists for safety data sheets in the EU. A signature does not by itself make a document legally valid or make your business compliant.
What you receive
A PDF in the 16-section REACH Annex II structure, signed and dated, with version information and a list of anything we could not establish. Five rounds of corrections are included.
Delivery
Within 72 hours of receiving complete input from you. The clock pauses whenever we are waiting on an answer.
Refunds
Full refund before review begins. If the evidence is insufficient, you choose a refund, store credit or a gap report. See the refund policy.
No fabricated-data guarantee.
If the available evidence is insufficient to support a defensible document for this CAS number and your product specification, we will not invent the missing values. You may choose a refund, store credit or a documented gap report.
The supplier placing the substance or mixture on the market remains responsible for ensuring that the final safety data sheet matches the material, its identified uses and their legal role in the supply chain.
📚 Naukowe referencje (Chicago Author-Date) — kliknij aby rozwinąć
Standardy zarządzania batchami i certyfikacji laboratoryjnej — 13 niezależnych źródeł (ICH Q1/Q3/Q6/Q7/Q10 + ISO 17025 + WHO TRS + 21 CFR 211 + EMA + USP + Ph.Eur. + PIC/S + IPEC-PQG).
International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). 2000. "Q7 Good Manufacturing Practice Guide for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients." ICH Expert Working Group. [link ↗] — GMP for APIs — adopted by EMA, FDA, MHLW
International Organization for Standardization. 2017. "ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories." ISO. [link ↗] — Lab accreditation standard underpinning every CoA
World Health Organization. 2010. "WHO Good Manufacturing Practices for Pharmaceutical Products: Main Principles (WHO Technical Report Series No. 957, Annex 3)." WHO Press. [link ↗] — WHO TRS No. 957 — global reference for GMP
International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). 2003. "ICH Q1A(R2): Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products." International Council for Harmonisation. [link ↗] — Source for batch shelf-life and retest dating
International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). 2006. "ICH Q3A(R2): Impurities in New Drug Substances." ICH. [link ↗]
International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). 1999. "ICH Q6A: Specifications for New Drug Substances and Products." ICH. [link ↗] — CoA acceptance-criteria specification standard
International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). 2008. "ICH Q10: Pharmaceutical Quality System." ICH. [link ↗]
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 2024. "21 CFR Part 211: Current Good Manufacturing Practice for Finished Pharmaceuticals." US Code of Federal Regulations. [link ↗] — US legal mandate (Subpart J — Records and Reports)
European Medicines Agency. 2014. "Guideline on Process Validation for Finished Products — Information and Data to Be Provided EMA/CHMP/CVMP/QWP/BWP/70278/2012." European Medicines Agency. [link ↗]
United States Pharmacopeial Convention. 2024. "United States Pharmacopeia and National Formulary, USP 47-NF 42." USP. [link ↗]
European Pharmacopoeia Commission. 2024. "European Pharmacopoeia 11th Edition." Council of Europe — EDQM. [link ↗]
Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme (PIC/S). 2021. "Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products PE 009-15." PIC/S Secretariat, Geneva. [link ↗] — Cross-recognized GMP for 54 inspectorates worldwide
International Pharmaceutical Excipients Council (IPEC) and Pharmaceutical Quality Group (PQG). 2017. "Joint IPEC-PQG Good Manufacturing Practices Guide for Pharmaceutical Excipients." IPEC-Americas. [link ↗] — Excipient-grade CoA standard for non-API ingredients
📜 Patenty (publiczne metadane)
brak danych
Aktualnie nie znaleziono publicznych metadanych patentowych dla tej substancji w Crossref / OpenAlex. Dane uzupełnimy automatycznie po odświeżeniu cache (24h).
📚 References (Chicago Author-Date) — click to expand
Anonymous. "Kinetics of Dissociative Electron Transfer in Electrocarboxylation of Benzyl Chloride.". https://doi.org/10.1021/acselectrochem.5c00094.s004.
Anonymous. "Kinetics of Dissociative Electron Transfer in Electrocarboxylation of Benzyl Chloride.". https://doi.org/10.1021/acselectrochem.5c00094.s002.
Anonymous. "Kinetics of Dissociative Electron Transfer in Electrocarboxylation of Benzyl Chloride.". https://doi.org/10.1021/acselectrochem.5c00094.s003.
Anonymous. "Kinetics of Dissociative Electron Transfer in Electrocarboxylation of Benzyl Chloride.". https://doi.org/10.1021/acselectrochem.5c00094.s001.
Maria M. Palaiologou, Ioanna E. Molinou. (1995). "Excess Volumes of Ethyl Acetate + Toluene, + o-Chlorotoluene, and + p-Chlorotoluene from 283.15 to 303.15 K". Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. https://doi.org/10.1021/je00020a031
B. Busa Goud, P. Venkatesu, M. V. Prabhakara Rao. (1995). "Excess Volumes of 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane or Tetrachloroethene + 2-Chlorotoluene, + 3-Chlorotoluene, and + 4-Chlorotoluene at 303.15 and 313.15 K". Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. https://doi.org/10.1021/je00022a013
World Intellectual Property Organization. 2024. "Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)." https://www.wipo.int/pct/.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. 2024. "USPTO Patent Public Search." https://ppubs.uspto.gov/.
European Patent Office. 2024. "Espacenet Patent Search." https://worldwide.espacenet.com/.
Newman, David J., and Gordon M. Cragg. 2020. "Natural Products as Sources of New Drugs over the Nearly Four Decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019." Journal of Natural Products 83 (3): 770-803.
Davies, Mark, Michał Nowotka, George Papadatos, et al. 2015. "ChEMBL Web Services: Streamlining Access to Drug Discovery Data and Utilities." Nucleic Acids Research 43 (W1): W612-W620.
Bickerton, G. Richard, Gaia V. Paolini, Jérémy Besnard, Sorel Muresan, and Andrew L. Hopkins. 2012. "Quantifying the Chemical Beauty of Drugs." Nature Chemistry 4 (2): 90-98.
Meanwell, Nicholas A. 2011. "Synopsis of Some Recent Tactical Application of Bioisosteres in Drug Design." Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 54 (8): 2529-2591.
Ertl, Peter, and Ansgar Schuffenhauer. 2009. "Estimation of Synthetic Accessibility Score of Drug-Like Molecules Based on Molecular Complexity and Fragment Contributions." Journal of Cheminformatics 1: 8.
Hopkins, Andrew L., and Colin R. Groom. 2002. "The Druggable Genome." Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 1 (9): 727-730.
Allison, John R., and Mark A. Lemley. 1998. "Empirical Evidence on the Validity of Litigated Patents." AIPLA Quarterly Journal 26 (3): 185-275.
Patani, George A., and Edmond J. LaVoie. 1996. "Bioisosterism: A Rational Approach in Drug Design." Chemical Reviews 96 (8): 3147-3176.
Lerner, Josh. 1994. "The Importance of Patent Scope: An Empirical Analysis." RAND Journal of Economics 25 (2): 319-333.
Masz bloga, forum lub serwis naukowy? Osadź interaktywną molekułę 3D na swojej stronie — zobaczy ją każdy Twój czytelnik, a poniżej ma link do naszego sklepu gdzie może kupić odczynnik.
🔗 Kod HTML iframe (najłatwiejsze — działa wszędzie)
Skopiuj i wklej w edytorze HTML swojej strony:
Dostosuj width i height do swojego layoutu.
⚙ WordPress Shortcode (dla innych sklepów z MOL-GOD)
🌐 Bezpośredni link (do emaili, czatów, LinkedIn, Twitter)
📋 Licencja: Embed zachowuje link zwrotny do MolGod (wymagane — sklep jest źródłem danych). Dane chemiczne pochodzą z PubChem (CC0 — domena publiczna). Embed jest BEZPŁATNY do zastosowań edukacyjnych, komercyjnych i hobby.
📚 REFERENCJE (Bibliografia zbiorcza, Chicago Author-Date) 78 items
Wszystkie źródła naukowe cytowane w akordeonach powyżej dla CAS 100-44-7. Format: Chicago Manual of Style 17th ed., Author-Date system.
AIST. n.d. Spectral Database for Organic Compounds (SDBS): CAS 100-44-7. Tsukuba, Japan: National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology. https://sdbs.db.aist.go.jp/.
Linstrom, Peter J., and William G. Mallard, eds. n.d. NIST Chemistry WebBook: NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.18434/T4D303.
PubChem. n.d. PubChem Compound Summary: CAS 100-44-7. Bethesda, MD: National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), National Library of Medicine. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/#query=100-44-7.
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). 2024. "Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP) — Harmonised Classification and Labelling." ECHA, Helsinki / Official Journal of the European Union. https://echa.europa.eu/regulations/clp/clp-classification.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 2017. "Recommendations for Chemical Protective Clothing: A Companion to the NIOSH Pocket Guide." U.S. Department of Health & Human Services / CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ncpc/default.html.
Connors, Kenneth A., Gordon L. Amidon, and Valentino J. Stella. 1986. Chemical Stability of Pharmaceuticals: A Handbook for Pharmacists, 2nd ed.. New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471734683.
Rumble, John R., ed. 2019. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics: 100th Edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. https://hbcp.chemnetbase.com/.
Stefanis, Emmanuel, and Costas Panayiotou. 2008. "Prediction of Hansen Solubility Parameters with a New Group-Contribution Method." International Journal of Thermophysics 29: 568-585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-008-0415-z.
Stoll, Vincent S., and John S. Blanchard. 1990. "Buffers: Principles and Practice: In Methods in Enzymology, vol. 182." San Diego: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(90)82008-P.
European Parliament. 2008. "Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP)." Official Journal of the European Union L 353: 1–1355.
United Nations. 2021. Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS). 9th revised ed. ST/SG/AC.10/30/Rev.9. New York and Geneva: United Nations. https://unece.org/ghs-rev9-2021.
United States Pharmacopeial Convention. 2024. "USP <621> Chromatography." In United States Pharmacopeia and National Formulary, USP 47-NF 42. Rockville, MD: USP. https://www.uspnf.com/.
International Organization for Standardization. 2017. "ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories." Geneva: ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/66912.html.
Kolthoff, Izaak Maurits, and Philip J. Elving, eds. 1978. Treatise on Analytical Chemistry, Part I: Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
Skoog, Douglas A., F. James Holler, and Stanley R. Crouch. 2018. Principles of Instrumental Analysis. 7th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning.
Christian, Gary D., Purnendu K. Dasgupta, and Kevin A. Schug. 2014. Analytical Chemistry. 7th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
International Organization for Standardization. 1994. "ISO 5725-2:1994 Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods and Results — Part 2: Basic Method for the Determination of Repeatability and Reproducibility of a Standard Measurement Method." Geneva: ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/11834.html.
Heckert, N. A., and J. J. Filliben. 2003. "NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook of Statistical Methods." NIST Handbook 151. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/.
Grubbs, Frank E. 1950. "Sample Criteria for Testing Outlying Observations." Annals of Mathematical Statistics 21 (1): 27–58.
Dixon, Wilfrid J. 1950. "Analysis of Extreme Values." Annals of Mathematical Statistics 21 (4): 488–506.
Snedecor, George W., and William G. Cochran. 1989. Statistical Methods. 8th ed. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
Student [William Sealy Gosset]. 1908. "The Probable Error of a Mean." Biometrika 6 (1): 1–25.
International Organization for Standardization. 2005. "ISO 3534-1:2006 Statistics — Vocabulary and Symbols — Part 1: General Statistical Terms and Terms Used in Probability." Geneva: ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/40145.html.
Thompson, Michael, Stephen L. R. Ellison, and Roger Wood. 2002. "Harmonized Guidelines for Single-Laboratory Validation of Methods of Analysis." Pure and Applied Chemistry 74 (5): 835–855.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. 2024. European Agreement Concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR), Applicable as from 1 January 2025 (ECE/TRANS/352). Geneva: UNECE. https://unece.org/transport/dangerous-goods/adr-2025-edition.
Główny Inspektorat Ochrony Środowiska (GIOŚ). 2024. "Baza Danych O Odpadach (BDO) — System rejestracji firm utylizacyjnych." Ministerstwo Klimatu i Środowiska. https://bdo.mos.gov.pl/.
International Organization for Standardization. 2017. "ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories." ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/66912.html.
World Health Organization. 2010. "WHO Good Manufacturing Practices for Pharmaceutical Products: Main Principles (WHO Technical Report Series No. 957, Annex 3)." WHO Press. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/trs957-annex3.
Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme (PIC/S). 2021. "Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products PE 009-15." PIC/S Secretariat, Geneva. https://picscheme.org/en/publications.
