Safety data sheet documentation for nitric acid …% [C > 70 %] (CAS 7697-37-2), compiled to REACH Annex II with classification read against the harmonised entry in CLP Annex VI (H272, H330, H314). Two options: a working draft sent by e-mail immediately, or a signed card issued within 72 hours of complete input. The item supplied is a document — MolGod.org does not sell, supply or ship chemical substances.
Free, and generated automatically from the sources listed on this page. No person has reviewed it, and it describes the substance in general — not your material, your process or your intended market.
Section 9 — physicochemical properties: 9 of 22 established.
We show what is established and name what is not. Classification and identity are complete on every card; section 9 is where public data is thin.
Identity, structure, physical and chemical properties, analytical data and the literature — every value with the source it came from and the date that source was read. The full record is in the data sections further down this page.
Identity CAS · EC · IUPAC · synonyms · molecular formula · molecular weight
Structure 2D · 3D · SMILES · InChI · InChIKey
Physical melting point · boiling point · density · vapour pressure · solubility
Chemical reactivity · stability · incompatible materials
Analytical spectra and methods where available
References literature, with DOI where a DOI exists
Identifier coverage is shown as a count, not as a quality rating. It tells you how well characterised this substance is in public data — which is a different question from how good it is, and a more useful one when you are deciding whether the documentation behind it can be defended.
This page sells the documentation for this substance, not the substance. Choose the level you need.
€0Audit the sheet you already haveSend us your existing sheet for this substance and we tell you what is wrong with it. One per company. If it turns out to be sound, you buy nothing.Start the free audit →
€49.99Working draftThe complete sixteen-section document, referenced, downloadable immediately after checkout. The right choice while the paperwork is still moving.
€249.99Signed cardThe same document reviewed and signed, issued within 72 hours of complete input — for the moment somebody official asks who stands behind it.
Documentation available for this substance: safety data sheet · CLP label · certificate of analysis on request · specification. Languages: the official language of your destination market, produced per card.
Grade, purity, physical form, packaging, minimum order and lead time are not shown, because MolGod does not supply the material — those are facts about a seller, and there is no seller on this page. They appear on storefronts we build for suppliers, where somebody can answer for them.
What a compliance officer checks, and where it sits in the document. The values themselves are in the regulatory sections further down.
Classification harmonised entry with index number where one exists; self-classification shown separately and labelled, never merged
Hazard statements the official text, in the page language
Precautionary statements combined statements reproduced whole, never split
Pictograms and signal word
Inventory status per jurisdiction, each stated individually
Restrictions entry and scope where one applies
Authorisation entry and sunset date where one applies
Candidate list status and the supply-chain duty it triggers
Transport entry per mode — road, sea, air
Exposure limits per country, each naming the act it comes from
Document status revision date and the amendment in force when issued
Fields with no established status say so. This page never states that no restrictions apply — absence from a dataset is not clearance, and a document that treats it as clearance is the most dangerous kind of document in this field.
A digital PDF safety data sheet in the sixteen-section structure of REACH Annex II (Regulation 1907/2006).
Substance identification, hazard classification, physicochemical, toxicological and ecological information, and regulatory references.
Classification read against the harmonised entry in CLP Annex VI where one exists for the substance.
A version number, a compilation date, and the source behind each value that carries one.
Delivery by e-mail. Nothing is shipped.
What this is not
Not a chemical substance, not a sample, not any physical goods.
Not a certification. No official certification scheme for safety data sheets exists in the European Union.
Not legal approval, and not a guarantee of compliance in any jurisdiction.
Not a substitute for your own regulatory assessment, nor for the safety data sheet supplied by the manufacturer or importer of the substance you actually hold.
Not adapted to a specific workplace, process or national annex unless you provide that information.
Where the available evidence does not support a value, the sheet states that the value is not established rather than estimating one. A field with no recorded source is marked as such.
What is in the buyer pack
Everything your compliance officer will ask for, in one file.
The product page as PDF — the record as published, so what you forward matches what you read.
The safety data sheet at your entitlement level — sixteen sections in the order set by REACH Annex II, for this substance, in the language you select.
The CLP label artwork — generated from the same classification as the sheet, so the two cannot disagree.
The specification, and the certificate of analysis where batch data exists.
sources.txt — every citation with the date it was read.
An explicit list of what we could not establish — fields marked unavailable rather than filled with an estimate. This is the honest part of the document and we do not hide it in a footnote.
Your European buyer is going to forward this to somebody who was not on the call. The pack exists so that what they forward is complete, self-explanatory and traceable — rather than four attachments and a sentence beginning “I think this is everything”.
These switch the language of this page. Single substances. Mixtures on enquiry. One document, one language — additional languages are priced separately. Every version, including the Chinese one, is written to EU law — (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) Annex II and (EU) 2020/878 — and translated from it. The Chinese version is a reference translation, not a legally valid document for the Chinese market: an SDS for China must be compiled separately to GB/T 16483 and GB/T 17519.
3D model Nitric Acid, CAS 7697-37-2, molecular formula HNO3, molar mass 63.013 g/mol
Data transcribed from regulatory registers and technical literature, with the source and edition stated. It does not replace the supplier's safety data sheet. Fields without a recorded source are marked as such.
📊 Physicochemical data — CAS 7697-37-2
📊Physicochemical properties
Quick Reference
Formula:HNO3
MW:63.013 g/mol
CAS:7697-37-2
Appearance:Transparent, colorless, or yellowish, fuming, hygroscopic, corrosive liquid
Odour:Characteristic choking odor
Detailed Properties
Supplements the “Physical & Chemical Properties (DB)” table below — values already shown there are not repeated.
PubChem. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NIH/NLM), chemical compound database. ↗
applies to: Molecular formula · Molecular weight · LogP (lipophilicity) · IUPAC name · SMILES · InChIKey
Rumble, J.R., ed. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 105th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2024. ↗
applies to: Melting point · Boiling point · Density · LogP (lipophilicity) · pKa
Junhu Wu, Dehua Xu, Xiushan Yang et al.. (2023). "Determination and Correlation of Vapor–Liquid Equilibria for the Nitric Acid + Water, Nitric Acid + Water + Phosphoric Acid, and Nitric Acid + Water +
Frank Huess Hedlund, Merete Folmer Nielsen, Sonja Hagen Mikkelsen et al.. (2014). "Violent explosion after inadvertent mixing of nitric acid and isopropanol – Review 15years later finds basic accident
L. M. Ferris. (1961). "Solubility of Molybdic Oxide and Its Hydrates in Nitric Acid, Nitric Acid-Ferric Nitrate, and Nitric Acid-Uranyl Nitrate Solutions.". Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. htt
MOLECULE
Per-CAS bibliography (live from 13+ databases)
Sources: db:crossref (5)
db:crossref
Junhu Wu, Dehua Xu, Xiushan Yang et al.. (2023). "Determination and Correlation of Vapor–Liquid Equilibria for the Nitric Acid + Water, Nitric Acid + Water + Phosphoric Acid, and Nitric Acid + Water + Phosphoric Acid + Sulfuric Acid System". Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.2c00718 →
db:crossref
Paul Duval. (2018). "Safety Evaluation of Nitric Acid Reactions with Polysaccharides". https://doi.org/10.2172/1467250 →
db:crossref
Frank Huess Hedlund, Merete Folmer Nielsen, Sonja Hagen Mikkelsen et al.. (2014). "Violent explosion after inadvertent mixing of nitric acid and isopropanol – Review 15years later finds basic accident data corrupted, no evidence of broad learning". Safety Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.06.010 →
db:crossref
L. M. Ferris. (1961). "Solubility of Molybdic Oxide and Its Hydrates in Nitric Acid, Nitric Acid-Ferric Nitrate, and Nitric Acid-Uranyl Nitrate Solutions.". Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. https://doi.org/10.1021/je60011a035 →
Regulatory status of the substance
This substance is subject to regulatory requirements: hazardous waste management (BDO — national rule, Poland); transport of dangerous goods (ADR/RID/IMDG). Details in the \"Regulatory Status (REACH/ECHA/CLP)\" section and on the SDS. Regulatory information — does not restrict purchase in this store.
🧮 Stoichiometry Calculator
🧪 Chemical Data
CAS Number
7697-37-2
Molecular formula
HNO3
Molar mass
63.013 g/mol
IUPAC name (EN)
nitric acid
SMILES
[N+](=O)(O)[O-]
InChIKey
GRYLNZFGIOXLOG-UHFFFAOYSA-N
📚 Related literature (16 articles)
Matched automatically from public bibliographic databases by text similarity. Not curated for this substance, and not part of the safety data sheet.
PubChem. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NIH/NLM), chemical compound database. ↗
applies to: PubChem CID · InChIKey · InChI · SMILES
ECHA. EC Inventory — EINECS, ELINCS, NLP and List Numbers assigned under REACH. Helsinki: European Chemicals Agency. ↗
applies to: EC Number
ChEMBL. European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), bioactivity database. ↗
applies to: ChEMBL
ChemSpider. Royal Society of Chemistry, chemical structure database. ↗
applies to: ChemSpider
Further reading
Publications thematically related to this CAS. They are not the source of any value shown on this card.
Extended Bibliography (7)
★★★★★CANONICAL_PAPERS💰 Paywall (probable)✓ verifiedWang Y; Li T; Yu Y et al.. 2022. "Electrochemical Synthesis of Nitric Acid from Nitrogen Oxidation." Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English).link[accessed: 2026-10-11]
★★★★½CANONICAL_PAPERS💰 Paywall (probable)✓ verifiedCrowther ER; Demers JD; Blum JD et al.. 2023. "Coupling of nitric acid digestion and anion-exchange resin separation for the determination of methylmercury isotopic composition within organisms." Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.link[accessed: 2026-10-11]
★★☆☆☆CROSSREF🔓 OPEN❓ unverifiedShankar, A. Ravi, Sole, Ravikumar, Krishna, D. Nanda Gopala, Philip, John. 2023. "Nitric Acid Corrosion of As-Received and Autoclaved Zircaloy-4 in All Zr-4 Nitric Acid Test Facility." Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance 33 (1): 301-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-023-07945-y.link[accessed: 2026-10-11]CC0 (metadata)
National Institute of Standards and Technology. 2024. "NIST Chemistry WebBook, SRD 69." Gaithersburg, MD: NIST. Accessed 2025-01-01. ↗
Spectral Database for Organic Structure Determination (SDBS). 2024. National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Japan. Accessed 2025-01-01. ↗
Ulrich, Eldon L., Hideo Akutsu, John F. Doreleijers, Yoko Harano, Yannis E. Ioannidis, Jundong Lin, Miron Livny, et al. 2008. "BioMagResBank." Nucleic Acids Research 36 (D1): D402–D408. [DOI ↗]
Horai, Hisayuki, Masanori Arita, Shigehiko Kanaya, Yoshito Nihei, Tasuku Ikeda, Kazuhiro Suwa, Yuya Ojima, et al. 2010. "MassBank: A Public Repository for Sharing Mass Spectral Data for Life Sciences." Journal of Mass Spectrometry 45 (7): 703–714. [DOI ↗]
Linstrom, P.J., and W.G. Mallard, eds. 2024. NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. ↗
McDonald, M. Shane, Mike McAvoy, and Ajit Bhalerao. 1988. "JCAMP-DX: A Standard Form for Exchange of Infrared Spectra in Computer Readable Form." Applied Spectroscopy 42 (1): 151–162. [DOI ↗]
PubChem. 2024. "PubChem Compound Database." National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. Accessed 2025-01-01. ↗
Spectra are fetched on demand from 9 sources. Each spectrum is stored in our database — the next time it is opened there are zero requests to the external API. Download JCAMP-DX / CSV / PNG for every spectrum without searching.
Type of data: Type of data not reported by the source (may be measured or calculated) These values are fetched from NMRShiftDB when you click Show; MolGod holds no record of their type.
⏳ Loading…
▶ Click to load spectrum
🔗 Source
About the downloads (Type of data: Type of data not reported by the source (may be measured or calculated)) JCAMP: the NMRShiftDB file as received (JCAMP-DX 5.01 text). It is a peak list: chemical shift in ppm. MolGod adds header lines stating the type of data; the values are unchanged. CSV: the same peak list in two columns. The second column repeats the shift value; it is not a signal intensity. Lines starting with # state the type of data. PNG: a picture of the plot above, with the type of data written on it. Use: where signals are expected or were reported (chemical shift positions). Not included or guaranteed: intensities, multiplicities, coupling constants, line shapes, and solvent or temperature unless stated. A predicted list is not a measurement and cannot serve as a reference spectrum for identity or purity testing. Downloads become active after Show.
Data is fetched once (JCAMP-DX parser) and stored in the plugin's local database. No duplicate downloads, no NIST queries on subsequent openings. Licences respected (only a deep link plus our own visualisation is published).
Data retrieved live from multiple sources (priority chain). JCAMP-DX / CSV / PNG available for download under each spectrum.
IR — Fourier-transform infrared
Loading IR — Fourier-transform infrared…
MS — Mass spectrometry (EI 70eV)
Loading MS — Mass spectrometry (EI 70eV)…
NMR spectrum — not applicable (inorganic compound)
For CAS 7697-37-2, the structure contains no carbon atoms or C–H bonds. 1H/13C NMR spectroscopy applies to organic compounds — for an inorganic substance (salt, mineral acid), predicting 1H/13C shifts is not applicable.
🧮 DFT vs experiment comparison (IR)
Overlay of the experimental IR spectrum on the theoretically calculated spectrum using the B3LYP/6-31G* method (scaling factor 0.9614, Scott & Radom 1996).
Experimental DFT (theoretical)
Full theoretical data (geometry, frequencies): NIST CCCBDB ↗
📚 Bibliography (Chicago)
Becke, Axel D. 1993. "Density-Functional Thermochemistry. III. The Role of Exact Exchange." Journal of Chemical Physics 98 (7): 5648–5652. Definition of the B3LYP functional.
Scott, Anthony P., and Leo Radom. 1996. "Harmonic Vibrational Frequencies: An Evaluation of Hartree–Fock, Møller–Plesset, Quadratic Configuration Interaction, Density Functional Theory, and Semiempirical Scale Factors." Journal of Physical Chemistry 100 (41): 16502–16513. Scaling factors for DFT (e.g., 0.9614 for B3LYP/6-31G*).
Merrick, Jeffrey P., Damian Moran, and Leo Radom. 2007. "An Evaluation of Harmonic Vibrational Frequency Scale Factors." Journal of Physical Chemistry A 111 (45): 11683–11700. An update to Scott & Radom — scale factors for newer DFT functionals.
Lee, Chengteh, Weitao Yang, and Robert G. Parr. 1988. "Development of the Colle-Salvetti Correlation-Energy Formula into a Functional of the Electron Density." Physical Review B 37 (2): 785–789. The LYP correlation — complements Becke 1993 for B3LYP.
Hehre, Warren J., Robert Ditchfield, and John A. Pople. 1972. "Self-Consistent Molecular Orbital Methods. XII. Further Extensions of Gaussian-Type Basis Sets." Journal of Chemical Physics 56 (5): 2257–2261. Definition of the 6-31G* basis set (split-valence + polarization).
Johnson, Russell D., III, ed. 2022. "NIST Computational Chemistry Comparison and Benchmark Database (CCCBDB)." NIST Standard Reference Database 101, Release 22. https://cccbdb.nist.gov. Benchmark for theoretical values — the fallback link in the widget.
Cramer, Christopher J. 2004. "Essentials of Computational Chemistry: Theories and Models." 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley. A textbook on DFT methods and vibrational frequency calculations.
Jensen, Frank. 2017. "Introduction to Computational Chemistry." 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley. Modern computational chemistry — basis sets and methods for vibrational spectra.
Foresman, James B., and Æleen Frisch. 2015. "Exploring Chemistry with Electronic Structure Methods." 3rd ed. Wallingford, CT: Gaussian, Inc. A practical Gaussian guide — IR + Raman + NMR from DFT.
🎓 Spectrum interpretation guide (for students)
Explanations of every band in the spectrum — why it appears where it does, and what it indicates about the structure.
IR (infrared) (0 peaks)
The structure contains no carbon — interpretation of organic IR functional groups (C–H, C=C, aromatic ring, carbonyl) does not apply here. Only detected bands are shown, without organic assignment.
📚 Bibliography (Chicago)
Field, Leslie D., Sev Sternhell, and John R. Kalman. 2013. "Organic Structures from Spectra." 5th ed. Chichester: Wiley. A student problem-set textbook (interpretation guide companion).
Williams, Dudley H., and Ian Fleming. 2008. "Spectroscopic Methods in Organic Chemistry." 6th ed. London: McGraw-Hill. A classic of narrative spectral interpretation — explains "why the peak is here".
Crews, Phillip, Jaime Rodríguez, and Marcel Jaspars. 2009. "Organic Structure Analysis." 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press. A workflow for multi-parameter structural interpretation.
McLafferty, Fred W., and František Tureček. 1993. "Interpretation of Mass Spectra." 4th ed. Mill Valley, CA: University Science Books. MS fragmentation mechanisms — McLafferty rearrangement, m/z 29 = CHO.
Reusch, William. 2013. "Virtual Textbook of Organic Chemistry: Spectroscopy." East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University. https://www2.chemistry.msu.edu/faculty/reusch/VirtTxtJml/Spectrpy/spectro.htm. An open educational guide to IR/NMR/MS/UV — ideal for explaining functional groups.
Hesse, Manfred, Herbert Meier, and Bernd Zeeh. 2007. "Spektroskopische Methoden in der organischen Chemie." 8th ed. Stuttgart: Thieme. The standard German textbook on spectral interpretation.
Lampman, Gary M., Donald L. Pavia, George S. Kriz, and James R. Vyvyan. 2010. "Spectroscopy." 4th ed. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning. A workbook with integrated interpretive narratives.
Kalsi, P. S. 2010. "Spectroscopy of Organic Compounds." 6th ed. New Delhi: New Age International. A complete textbook on IR/NMR/MS/UV spectral interpretation.
🔎 Spectrum Search (JCAMP-DX)
Upload a JCAMP-DX file (.jdx, .dx, .jcm) — the system will calculate the cosine similarity against all spectra in the database and display the TOP 10 matches.
📚 Bibliography (Chicago)
McLafferty, Fred W., ed. 2018. Wiley Registry of Mass Spectral Data. 11th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. A reference MS library (~775k spectra).
Stein, Stephen E., and Donald R. Scott. 1994. "Optimization and Testing of Mass Spectral Library Search Algorithms for Compound Identification." Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 5 (9): 859–866. The cosine + dot-product algorithm of NIST MS Search.
McDonald, Robert S., and Paul A. Wilks Jr. 1988. "JCAMP-DX: A Standard Form for Exchange of Infrared Spectra in Computer Readable Form." Applied Spectroscopy 42 (1): 151–162. The JCAMP-DX specification (extended to 5.01 for NMR/MS).
McLafferty, Fred W., and František Tureček. 1993. "Interpretation of Mass Spectra." 4th ed. Mill Valley, CA: University Science Books. Cosine-similarity matching and MS fragmentation — the foundation of the search algorithm.
Sumner, Lloyd W., Alexander Amberg, Dave Barrett, Michael H. Beale, Richard Beger, Clare A. Daykin, Teresa W.-M. Fan, et al. 2007. "Proposed Minimum Reporting Standards for Chemical Analysis." Metabolomics 3 (3): 211–221. MSI Level 1-4 — confidence-level standards for spectral matching.
Stein, Stephen E. 1999. "An Integrated Method for Spectrum Extraction and Compound Identification from Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry Data." Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 10 (8): 770–781. The AMDIS algorithm — deconvolution + library match (NIST).
Lindon, John C., George E. Tranter, and David W. Koppenaal, eds. 2017. "Encyclopedia of Spectroscopy and Spectrometry." 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Academic Press. Encyclopedia entries on spectral library searching.
Smith, Brian C. 2011. "Fundamentals of Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy." 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. FT-IR and the JCAMP-DX format for transmission spectra.
Larkin, Peter. 2017. "Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy: Principles and Spectral Interpretation." 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Principles of IR/Raman library matching and peak preprocessing.
Structural properties
Loading structural data...
❓ Frequently asked questions (3)
What is 7697-37-2?
7697-37-2 (CAS 7697-37-2) is a chemical compound. The chemical data comes from PubChem (National Institutes of Health, USA).
Helpful?
What is the CAS number of 7697-37-2?
The CAS number for 7697-37-2 is 7697-37-2. A CAS Registry Number is the standard identifier for a chemical substance in scientific literature and in trade.
Helpful?
How should 7697-37-2 be stored?
7697-37-2 should be stored as its safety data sheet directs \— typically in a dry, cool, well-ventilated place, away from heat and from materials it is incompatible with.
Helpful?
➕ Suggest a question
Download structure files
Molecular structure files from the PubChem database (NIH). Compatible with Avogadro, PyMOL, Jmol, and ChemDraw.
Cohen ER, Cvitaš T, Frey JG, Holmström B, Kuchitsu K, Marquardt R, Mills I, Pavese F, Quack M, Stohner J, Strauss HL, Takami M, Thor AJ (2007)
g/L ↔ molarity
c (mol/L) = (g/L) / MW
±0.1% (depends on MW precision)
Cohen ER, Cvitaš T, Frey JG, Holmström B, Kuchitsu K, Marquardt R, Mills I, Pavese F, Quack M, Stohner J, Strauss HL, Takami M, Thor AJ (2007)
mmol/L ↔ molarity
c (mol/L) = mmol/L × 10⁻³
Exact
Cohen ER, Cvitaš T, Frey JG, Holmström B, Kuchitsu K, Marquardt R, Mills I, Pavese F, Quack M, Stohner J, Strauss HL, Takami M, Thor AJ (2007)
Celsius ↔ Kelvin
T(K) = t(°C) + 273.15
±0.01 K (ITS-90 scale)
BIPM (Bureau International des Poids et Mesures) (2019)
Celsius ↔ Fahrenheit
T(°F) = T(°C) × 9/5 + 32
±0.1 °F
Thompson A, Taylor BN (2008)
density-corrected % ↔ molarity
c (mol/L) = (%w/w × ρ × 10) / MW, ρ in g/mL
±0.1% when ρ known to 3 decimals
Cohen ER, Cvitaš T, Frey JG, Holmström B, Kuchitsu K, Marquardt R, Mills I, Pavese F, Quack M, Stohner J, Strauss HL, Takami M, Thor AJ (2007)
📚 Bibliography (8 authoritative sources)
Thompson A, Taylor BN (2008). Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI). NIST Special Publication 811 · DOI: 10.6028/NIST.SP.811-2008 → Primary SI standard for US scientific usage
Cohen ER, Cvitaš T, Frey JG, Holmström B, Kuchitsu K, Marquardt R, Mills I, Pavese F, Quack M, Stohner J, Strauss HL, Takami M, Thor AJ (2007). Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry — The IUPAC Green Book. RSC Publishing, 3rd ed. · DOI: 10.1039/9781847557889 · ISBN: 978-0-85404-433-7 → Canonical IUPAC guide for chemistry quantities/units
BIPM (Bureau International des Poids et Mesures) (2019). The International System of Units (SI), 9th edition. BIPM · ↗ → International SI definitions (incl. redefined kilogram 2019)
ISO/IEC (2022). Quantities and units — Part 1: General. International Organization for Standardization — ISO 80000-1:2022 · ↗ → General rules for physical quantities and units
ISO/IEC (2019). Quantities and units — Part 9: Physical chemistry and molecular physics. International Organization for Standardization — ISO 80000-9:2019 · ↗ → Concentration / molality / amount-of-substance conventions
Tiesinga E, Mohr PJ, Newell DB, Taylor BN (2021). CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2018. Rev. Mod. Phys. 93(2):025010 · DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.93.025010 → Avogadro, gas constant, molar volume (2019 SI revision)
IUPAC (2019). Compendium of Chemical Terminology — the IUPAC Gold Book (online). IUPAC · DOI: 10.1351/goldbook → Definitions of mass fraction, molality, normality, ppm, activity
Mills IM, Cvitaš T, Homann K, Kallay N, Kuchitsu K (1988). Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry. Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1st ed. · ISBN: 0-632-01773-5 → Historical predecessor of IUPAC Green Book
Verify reagent purity using standardized analytical methods. Select a test method below and enter your measurement results for automated calculation.
🛡️ Safety — CAS 7697-37-2
Data limitations notice. The safety information on this page is for reference only and does not replace a full safety data sheet (SDS). Before using the product, consult the manufacturer's current safety data sheet and the GHS/CLP guidance. The CLP classification applies to the pure bulk substance, not to commercial formulations.
GHS/CLP classification — Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 + UN GHS Rev. 9 (2021).
⚠️ Danger
⭕GHS03Oxidizing🧪GHS05Corrosive☠GHS06Toxic
🚨 Hazard statements (H)
H272 — May intensify fire; oxidiser
H330 — Fatal if inhaled
H314 — Causes severe skin burns and eye damage
🛡 Precautionary statements (P)
P210 — Keep away from heat, hot surfaces, sparks, open flames and other ignition sources. No smoking
P234 — Keep only in original packaging
✓ Harmonised classification pursuant to Annex VI of the CLP Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 (official, binding classification). Index number: 007-004-00-1.
Reference (Chicago): European Chemicals Agency. "nitric acid …% [C > 70 %], Index No. 007-004-00-1." In Table 3 of Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP Regulation), 23rd Adaptation to Technical Progress (harmonised list as of 2026-07-07). Helsinki: European Chemicals Agency, 2026. https://echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals/annex-vi-to-clp.
Translations: CLP Regulation (EC) 1272/2008, Annexes III and IV. Data: PubChem/NLM.
☢️ Toxicological data (IARC + EPA CTX)
🧬 IARC Carcinogen Classification
IARC classification:
No individual IARC entry for this CAS
No separate IARC monograph in the checked lists — this is NOT confirmation of a lack of carcinogenicity. Check the CLP/GHS classification (CMR / GHS section).
Junhu Wu, Dehua Xu, Xiushan Yang et al.. (2023). "Determination and Correlation of Vapor–Liquid Equilibria for the Nitric Acid + Water, Nitric Acid + Water + Phosphoric Acid, and Nitric Acid + Water + Phosphoric Acid + Sulfuric Acid System". Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.2c00718 [DOI]
Paul Duval. (2018). "Safety Evaluation of Nitric Acid Reactions with Polysaccharides". https://doi.org/10.2172/1467250 [DOI]
Frank Huess Hedlund, Merete Folmer Nielsen, Sonja Hagen Mikkelsen et al.. (2014). "Violent explosion after inadvertent mixing of nitric acid and isopropanol – Review 15years later finds basic accident data corrupted, no evidence of broad learning". Safety Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.06.010 [DOI]
L. M. Ferris. (1961). "Solubility of Molybdic Oxide and Its Hydrates in Nitric Acid, Nitric Acid-Ferric Nitrate, and Nitric Acid-Uranyl Nitrate Solutions.". Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. https://doi.org/10.1021/je60011a035 [DOI]
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). 2024. "IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans." Lyon: IARC. 🔗
U.S. EPA. 2024. "ECOTOX Knowledgebase." Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 🔗
ECHA. 2024. "Chemical Safety Assessment." European Chemicals Agency. 🔗
U.S. National Toxicology Program. 2024. Report on Carcinogens. 15th ed. Research Triangle Park, NC: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. 🔗
GESTIS. 2024. "GESTIS Substance Database." Institute for Occupational Safety and Health of the German Social Accident Insurance (DGUV). 🔗
U.S. EPA. 2024. "CompTox Chemicals Dashboard." Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 🔗
ECHA. 2023. "Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP), Annex VI — Harmonised Classification." European Chemicals Agency. 🔗
Leist, Marcel, et al. 2014. "Consensus Report on the Future of Animal-Free Systemic Toxicity Testing." ALTEX 31 (3): 341–356. [DOI]
Hartung, Thomas. 2009. "Toxicology for the Twenty-First Century." Nature 460 (7252): 208–212. [DOI]
Lenga, Robert E., ed. 2008. The Sigma-Aldrich Library of Chemical Safety Data. 2nd ed. Milwaukee: Sigma-Aldrich.
🆘 First Aid — Emergency ProceduresCAS 7697-37-2
Danger
Hazard class: Oxidizing
⚠️ IMPORTANT:
In case of a serious incident — call 112 or the Poison Control Center (Poland): +48 42 631 47 24 (Łódź).
Conc. HNO3: brown NO2 fumes — delayed pulmonary edema up to 72h, hospital observation mandatory.
Oxidizer: do NOT use paper/sawdust for absorption (ignition risk). Vermiculite/perlite only.
🩹
Skin contact
⏱ Timeline: Seconds; yellow staining 10–60 s
🔴 Symptoms
YELLOW DISCOLOURATION (xanthoproteic reaction of proteins)
Sodium thiosulfate (Na2S2O3) 25% — 100 mL as neutralizer
ABC dry powder extinguisher
📚 Sources (Chicago Author-Date)
Goldfrank, Lewis R., Robert S. Hoffman, Mary Ann Howland, Neal A. Lewin, Lewis S. Nelson, and Silas W. Smith. 2019. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies. McGraw-Hill Education.
Olson, Kent R., Ilene B. Anderson, Neal L. Benowitz, Paul D. Blanc, Richard F. Clark, Thomas E. Kearney, Susan Y. Kim-Katz, and Alan H. B. Wu. 2018. Poisoning & Drug Overdose. McGraw-Hill.
World Health Organization (WHO). 2007. Antidotes for Poisoning by Cyanide (IPCS Evaluation Series 21). International Programme on Chemical Safety, WHO Press. ↗
Howland, Mary Ann, and Robert S. Aaron. 2002. Goldfrank's Antidotes for Pediatric Emergency Care. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Centrum Zatruć Łódź. 2024. Procedury kliniczne w zatruciach ostrych — wytyczne dla ratowników. Centrum Informacji Toksykologicznej. ↗
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 2007. Recommendations for First Aid Procedures for Chemical Exposures (NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards, DHHS Publication No. 2005-149). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. ↗
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). 2021. Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS), Revision 9. United Nations. ↗
Brent, Jeffrey. 2009. Fomepizole for the Treatment of Pediatric Ethylene and Diethylene Glycol, Butoxyethanol, and Methanol Poisonings. Clinical Toxicology 48(5): 401–406.
European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN). 2018. Caustic Ingestion in Children — Position Paper. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 66(5): 838–845.
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). 2024. Toxicological Profiles — Medical Management Guidelines. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. ↗
IPCS INCHEM. 2024. International Programme on Chemical Safety — Poisons Information Monographs. WHO/UNEP/ILO. ↗
American National Standards Institute (ANSI). 2014. ANSI Z358.1-2014 — Emergency Eyewash and Shower Equipment. International Safety Equipment Association.
🚨 Emergency procedure — chemical spillOxidizing
CAS 7697-37-2GHS:H272H290(non-binding)H314EUH071(non-binding)⚠️ EVACUATION (10m)💨 Ventilation
🥽 PPE — Personal protective equipment
Gloves:butyl rubber (>0.7mm) — NOT nitrile/latex!
Goggles:Yes
Face shield:Yes
Respirator:full mask NO2 filter
Suit:Tychem F
📦 Small spill (<1L) — absorbent: vermiculite (dry, NOT cellulose!)
1. Ventilate INTENSIVELY — brown NO2 fumes, lethal >100 ppm
2. FULL PPE: butyl 0.7mm + full-face mask with NO2 filter
3. Do NOT use paper/sawdust (self-ignition with conc. HNO3)
4. Contain with dry vermiculite
5. SLOWLY neutralise with dilute NaHCO3 or Ca(OH)2 (risk of violent reaction!)
6. Collect into HDPE
7. Wash the area copiously with water
🛢️ Large spill (>1L) ⚠️ Hazardous material
1. EVACUATION 50-100m (NO2 vapours toxic over a wider radius)
2. Only HAZMAT teams with SCBA self-contained breathing apparatus
3. With conc. HNO3 (>65%): brown nitrous fumes — call the fire brigade
4. Do NOT use pressurised water (splashing + evaporation + exothermic reaction)
5. Containment with lime + controlled neutralisation
6. Notify WIOŚ (environmental protection inspectorate) + Crisis Management Centre
🩹 First aid
🧴 Skin
1. Remove clothing immediately
2. Flush with water for 30 min
3. YELLOW SKIN DISCOLORATION = xanthoproteic reaction of proteins (third-degree burn)
4. HOSPITAL ALWAYS
👁️ Eyes
1. IMMEDIATELY 30 min of water
2. AMBULANCE + OPHTHALMOLOGIST
3. Concentrated HNO3 causes immediate cataract + corneal perforation
🫁 Inhalation
1. Fresh air, semi-reclining position
2. 100% oxygen
3. CAUTION: delayed pulmonary oedema up to 72h after NO2 exposure
4. HOSPITAL OBSERVATION 72h mandatory
🍽️ Ingestion
1. Do NOT induce vomiting
2. Milk 200ml
3. Poison Control Centre IMMEDIATELY
4. Endoscopy at hospital
🌍 Environment:
Water: High; Soil: High; ❌ Do not release into drains; Waste Code: 06 01 05*
Urben, Peter G., ed.. 2017. Bretherick's Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards. Elsevier Academic Press.
8th ed. ISBN 978-0-08-100971-0.
U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. 2024. 29 CFR 1910.120 — Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response (HAZWOPER). U.S. Code of Federal Regulations.
[link ↗]
National Fire Protection Association. 2018. NFPA 472: Standard for Competence of Responders to Hazardous Materials/Weapons of Mass Destruction Incidents. NFPA.
[link ↗]
European Parliament and Council. 2012. Directive 2012/18/EU on the Control of Major-Accident Hazards Involving Dangerous Substances (Seveso III). Official Journal of the European Union L 197: 1–37.
[link ↗]
U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. 2024. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[link ↗]
European Chemicals Agency. 2020. Guidance on the Compilation of Safety Data Sheets (SDS), Version 3.1. ECHA.
[link ↗]
Sources: ECHA Annex VI 007-004-00-1 · NIOSH Pocket Guide · GESTIS · Bretherick 8th ed..
Last verified: 2026-04-27 09:00:00.
Indicative data only — in an emergency, always follow the supplier's instructions and local occupational health and safety (OHS) regulations.
⚡ Visual PPE guide (personal protective equipment)Oxidizer
🧤 Gloves
Butyl rubber >0.7 mm EN 374-1 typ A
Do NOT use latex/leather — oxidizers can ignite organic materials
👁️ Safety Glasses / Goggles
EN 166 B/T/9+ FACE SHIELD
With a face shield for H2O2 >50%, fuming HNO3, concentrated KMnO4
🥼 Lab Coat / Coverall
Tychem F coverall (chemical resistant) EN 14605 typ 3-B + EN ISO 14116 (limited flame spread)
For >50% H2O2 — full coverall instead of a lab coat
Min. 12 ACH for operations with >30% H2O2; no ignition sources nearby
📚 Scientific references (Chicago Author-Date)
European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2016. EN 374-1:2016 — Protective gloves against dangerous chemicals and micro-organisms — Part 1: Terminology and performance requirements for chemical risks. CEN, Brussels. EN 374-1:2016. [link ↗] — Classification of chemical-resistant gloves type A/B/C; JKLPT permeation tests
European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2001. EN 166:2001 — Personal eye-protection — Specifications. CEN, Brussels. EN 166:2001. [link ↗] — Markings: B = medium-energy impact, T = extreme temperatures, 9 = molten metals and hot solids
European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2009. EN 14605:2005+A1:2009 — Protective clothing against liquid chemicals — Performance requirements for clothing with liquid-tight (Type 3) or spray-tight (Type 4) connections. CEN, Brussels. EN 14605:2009. [link ↗] — Type 3 (jet-tight) and Type 4 (spray-tight) protection against liquid chemicals
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 2017. Recommendations for Chemical Protective Clothing: A Companion to the NIOSH Pocket Guide. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services / CDC. [link ↗] — Practical guide to CPC (chemical protective clothing) selection per substance and exposure scenario
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). 2011. Personal Protective Equipment — General requirements. U.S. Department of Labor — 29 CFR 1910.132. 29 CFR 1910.132. [link ↗] — The employer must provide PPE + training + a documented written hazard assessment
🗄️ Storage compatibility matrix (6×6)
Oxidizers
Visual storage compatibility matrix — check before placing containers next to each other. Hover over a cell to see the explanation and the source rule (NFPA / OSHA / Bretherick / ECHA).
✓
Safe (SAFE)!
Caution (CAUTION)✗
Incompatible (INCOMPATIBLE)◐
Separate (SEPARATE)
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). 2024. NFPA 30: Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code. NFPA, Quincy, MA. NFPA 30 (2024 ed.). [link ↗] — §9.4–9.7 — class-based storage segregation rules (the canonical US lab/industrial reference)
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). 2023. 29 CFR 1910.106 — Flammable Liquids. U.S. Department of Labor, Federal Register. 29 CFR 1910.106. [link ↗] — (d)(5)(i)–(iv) — flammable storage cabinet, inside-storage room, and segregation requirements
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). 2024. Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP) — Harmonised Classification and Labelling. ECHA, Helsinki / Official Journal of the European Union. CLP Annex VI. [link ↗] — §2.4–2.5 — EU-level classification driving storage compatibility under REACH/CLP
ℹ️ Regulatory obligations checklist for CAS 7697-37-2.
Status based on: ADR 2025 (Table A), REACH Annex XVII, CLP Annex VI (harmonised classification), hazard class from the m14-spill DB, SVHC, GIS and the Polish OEL list. Principle: no data = no claim (we do NOT declare "no restrictions" without a basis).
✅SDS (Safety Data Sheet) availablefulfilled
How to comply: Requirement: current SDS compliant with Reg. 1907/2006 (REACH) Annex II, 16-section format.
Legal basis: Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) Art. 31 + Annex II
▣Compliant CLP label (pictograms + signal word + H/P)required
How to comply: The label must include: GHS pictograms, the signal word (Danger/Warning), hazard (H) and precautionary (P) statements, and manufacturer details. Required since 2010 (substances) and 2015 (mixtures). For this substance a HARMONISED CLASSIFICATION applies (CLP Annex VI) — see below; it takes precedence over self-classification.
Legal basis: Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP) Art. 17-33 + Annex VI (harmonised classification)
How to comply: Road transport compliant with ADR 2025: Class 8, UN 2031, PG II. Required: DGSA safety adviser certificate, class + UN labels, transport documents, packaging compliant with Chapter 6.
Legal basis: ADR 2025 European Agreement + Polish Act of 19 August 2011 on the Transport of Dangerous Goods National rules — Poland
🔵REACH registration (>1 t/year EU import)conditional
How to comply: Importers/manufacturers ≥1 tonne/year must register the substance with ECHA (technical dossier + Chemical Safety Report if ≥10 t). Check the ECHA Annex VI / registered substances list.
Legal basis: Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) Art. 5-22
⚪REACH Annex XVII (use/marketing restrictions)not applicable
How to comply: Checked against the harmonised classification (CLP Annex VI): the substance has no CMR category 1A/1B classification, so it is NOT subject to the general ban on sale to the general public under entries 28–30 of Annex XVII. NOTE: specific (non-CMR) Annex XVII entries are not covered by the MOL-GOD dataset (incomplete dataset) — if in doubt, check the consolidated Annex XVII on the ECHA website.
Legal basis: Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) Annex XVII — restrictions on manufacture, placing on the market and use
European Parliament and Council. 2008. Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (CLP). Official Journal of the European Union L 353/1. CLP Regulation 1272/2008. [link ↗] — Classification, labelling and packaging of substances + mixtures (GHS implementation in the EU)
European Parliament and Council. 2006. Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH). Official Journal of the European Union L 396/1. REACH Regulation 1907/2006. [link ↗] — REACH — registration, evaluation and authorisation of chemicals; SVHC; SDS Annex II
Ministerstwo Rodziny i Polityki Społecznej Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. 2024. Rozporządzenie Ministra Rodziny i Polityki Społecznej z dnia 4 września 2024 r. w sprawie najwyższych dopuszczalnych stężeń i natężeń czynników szkodliwych dla zdrowia w środowisku pracy. Dziennik Ustaw RP 2024 poz. 1017. National rules — Poland[link ↗] — NDS and NDSCh for ~600 chemical substances — current Polish occupational exposure limits
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). 2025. European Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR), 2025 Edition. United Nations, Geneva. ADR 2025. [link ↗] — International agreement on the road transport of dangerous goods — UN numbers, classes, packaging
📚 Consolidated scientific references — Chicago Author-Date 10 sources
References collected from all Safety Hub tabs. CAS: 7697-37-2 ·
PubChem ↗
Parlament Europejski i Rada UE. 2008. "Regulation (EC) nr 1272/2008 w sprawie klasyfikacji, oznakowania i pakowania substancji (CLP)." Dz.Urz. UE L 353. [↗]
GHS, Regulations
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). 2021. "Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS), Ninth Revised Edition." United Nations, Geneva. [↗]
GHS
Goldfrank, Lewis R., Robert S. Hoffman, Mary Ann Howland, et al.. 2019. "Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 11th ed.." McGraw-Hill Education, New York. ISBN 978-1-25-985961-8.
First aid, Toxicology
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 2023. "NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards (DHHS Publ. 2005-149)." U.S. Department of Health and Human Services / CDC, Cincinnati, OH. [↗]
First aid, PPE, Toxicology
European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2016. "EN 374-1:2016 — Protective gloves against dangerous chemicals and micro-organisms." CEN, Brussels. [↗]
PPE
UNECE. 2023. "European Agreement Concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR 2025)." United Nations, Geneva. [↗]
Disposal, Regulations
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). 2022. "NFPA 400 — Hazardous Materials Code." NFPA, Quincy, MA. [↗]
Storage
Urben, P.G. (ed.). 2017. "Bretherick's Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards, 8th ed.." Butterworth-Heinemann / Elsevier, Oxford. [↗]
Storage
Ministerstwo Klimatu i Środowiska RP. 2023. "Baza danych o produktach i opakowaniach oraz o gospodarce odpadami (BDO)." Ministerstwo Klimatu i Środowiska, Warszawa. National rules — Poland[↗]
Disposal
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC / WHO). 2024. "IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans — List of Classifications." WHO, Lyon. [↗]
Toxicology
Tabs with their own references (Emergency, PPE, Storage, Waste) contain additional bibliographic entries within their respective sections.
Paste a series of replicate measurements (CSV, or one number per line). The calculator computes the mean, standard deviation and 95% CI, and detects outliers (Grubbs + Dixon Q).
Separator: comma, space, tab, new line. Minimum 3 measurements.
📐 Statistical formulas
x̄ = Σxᵢ / n — arithmetic mean
s² = Σ(xᵢ - x̄)² / (n-1) — sample variance
s = √s² — standard deviation
RSD% = (s / x̄) × 100% — relative standard deviation
Plan your entire laboratory project: add experiments with reagents, replicates, and duration. You'll get a Gantt chart, a shopping list (with links to the store!), a budget with a 10% margin, and a GHS risk matrix.
💡 Log in to save projects.
Without logging in you can calculate but not save.
🧪 Solubility and solvent compatibility
Molecule
Nitric Acid
Formula
HNO3
logP (XLogP3)
0.20
Mass (g/mol)
63.013
Polarity
Moderate
⚠️ GC estimate (Hoftyzer–Van Krevelen). No literature HSP data for this CAS — precision ±2 MPa½. Verify experimentally.
Solvent
Compat.
Ra
Visual
GC-MS
HPLC
Applications
References
Ra < R₀ = good miscibility · Ra < 1,5×R₀ = borderline · above = poor (R₀ — radius of the Hansen sphere of this molecule) For this molecule R₀ = 8..
Solubility theory (applied in compatibility prediction):
Yalkowsky, Samuel H., and Shri C. Valvani. 1980. "Solubility and Partitioning I: Solubility of Nonelectrolytes in Water." Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 69 (8): 912–922. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600690814 — General Solubility Equation (GSE): logS = 0.5 − logP − 0.01(MP−25).
Hansen, Charles M. 2007. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook. 2nd ed. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420006834 — HSP triplet (dD, dP, dH) + Ra formula.
Stefanis, E., and C. Panayiotou. 2008. "Prediction of Hansen Solubility Parameters with a New Group-Contribution Method." Int J Thermophys 29: 568–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-008-0415-z
Reichardt, Christian, and Thomas Welton. 2011. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry. 4th ed. Wiley-VCH. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527632220 — E_T(30) polarity scale, solvatochromism.
Snyder, Lloyd R., Joseph J. Kirkland, and John W. Dolan. 2010. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470508183 — Eluotropic series, polarity index.
Van Krevelen, D. W., and K. Te Nijenhuis. 2009. Properties of Polymers. 4th ed. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-054819-7.X0001-5 — Hoftyzer–Van Krevelen group contribution for dD/dP/dH from SMILES.
Marcus, Yizhak. 1998. The Properties of Solvents. Wiley Series in Solution Chemistry, Vol. 4. ISBN 9780471983699 — Complete tabular set of 250+ solvents (ε, μ, donicity, acceptor numbers).
PubChem Compound Database — CAS 7697-37-2 lookup ↗ — logP (XLogP3), water solubility experimental + predicted.
Full bibliography in the REFERENCES accordion (at the bottom of the page) — Chicago Manual of Style 17th ed., Author-Date.
🧮 Solubility calculator
Solubility:—
logS:—
Method:—
⚠️ —
Solubility vs temperature
🌐 Hansen Solubility Sphere (3D)
⚠️ The Hansen parameters for this substance fall outside the range of the method.
At least one of the δD/δP/δH parameters fell outside the domain of validity of the group contribution method (Hoftyzer–Van Krevelen), so the position of the molecule in Hansen space is unknown. The distance Ra is measured FROM THAT POINT — it cannot be calculated without knowing the point. The sphere and the distance table have been omitted rather than filled with numbers that have nothing behind them. Where a solubility measurement exists, it is shown in the table below.
Ra < R₀ = good miscibility · Ra < 1,5×R₀ = borderline · above = poor (R₀ — radius of the Hansen sphere of this molecule) Target molecule: δD=outside the method's range,
δP=outside the method's range,
δH=outside the method's range8
📊 Automatically extracted topics from the abstracts of 16 publications for CAS 7697-37-2.
Algorithm: TF-IDF (Salton & Buckley 1988) — term frequency × inverse document frequency.
soil 7
nitrate 6
chemical 5
nitrogen 5
under 5
biochar 4
global 4
stress 3
ambient 3
simultaneous 3
🔍 Ranking details (TF-IDF)
Tag
TF
DF
IDF
Score
soil
7
2
2.735
19.142
nitrate
6
3
2.447
14.682
chemical
5
2
2.735
13.673
nitrogen
5
2
2.735
13.673
under
5
3
2.447
12.235
biochar
4
2
2.735
10.938
global
4
3
2.447
9.788
stress
3
2
2.735
8.204
ambient
3
2
2.735
8.204
simultaneous
3
2
2.735
8.204
🔗 Citation network16 seed papers
📊 Citation graph for CAS 7697-37-2.
Each node = a research paper; an A→B edge = paper A cites B. Data from OpenAlex (Priem 2022).
⚡ Fetch network data
Network built on-demand from the OpenAlex API (24h cache).
Why this page can be checked
Identity
CAS, EC and molecular formula, resolved across the identifier systems a buyer uses. The count of systems resolved is shown, so you can see how well characterised this substance is rather than assuming.
Data
Every physicochemical value carries the source it came from and the date that source was read. Open any of them.
Classification
Read against the harmonised entry where one exists, with the index number stated. Self-classification is shown separately and labelled.
Regulatory
Inventory, restriction, authorisation and candidate-list status, each stated individually. Where a status is not established, this page says so — it never says no restrictions apply.
Documentation
Which documents exist, at what review level, in which languages, and when each was issued.
Supplier
Who is selling this, and what they have published about themselves.
Nothing on this page is a certification. It is a record you can audit.
Two guarantees, both with their limits stated
The Gap Report Guarantee
If the available evidence cannot support a defensible document for your CAS number and product specification, we will not invent the missing values. You receive a documented gap report and choose: a refund, store credit, or the report on its own.
A visible gap is worth more than a plausible number, because the plausible number is the one that fails when somebody checks it.
The Re-issue Promise
If a signed card is rejected by an authority or by a customer’s compliance officer on one of the points we checked and reported as passed, we re-issue it corrected at no charge and credit the original fee.
This covers the checks we performed and named. It does not cover registration status, tonnage, or your role in the supply chain — those are not ours to hold, and a guarantee that pretended otherwise would be worth nothing.
A safety data sheet for nitric acid …% [C > 70 %], CAS 7697-37-2, in the sixteen-section structure required across the European Union. The deliverable is the document itself.
nitric acid …% [C > 70 %] (CAS 7697-37-2) at a glance
Substance – nitric acid …% [C > 70 %]
CAS number – 7697-37-2
EC number – 231-714-2
CLP Annex VI index number – 007-004-00-1
Hazard statements – H272 (may intensify fire; oxidiser); H330 (fatal if inhaled); H314 (causes severe skin burns and eye damage)
Concentration limits / M-factor / ATE – Ox. Liq. 3;H272: C ≥ 65.0%;inhalation: ATE = 2.65 mg/L vapours;Skin Corr. 1A;H314: C ≥ 20.0%;Skin Corr. 1B;H314: 5.0% ≤ C < 20.0%
Entry current as of – ATP15
CMR classification – not classified as CMR in the harmonised entry
Documentation issued – safety data sheet in REACH Annex II structure; working draft or signed card
What is supplied – a document. MolGod.org does not sell, supply or ship chemical substances.
What do customs check when importing nitric acid …% [C > 70 %]?
When a consignment of nitric acid …% [C > 70 %] is stopped at the border, the document examined first is rarely the invoice. It is section 14 of the safety data sheet and its agreement with the transport papers. A missing packing group, an absent UN number or a proper shipping name that contradicts the classification of CAS 7697-37-2 will hold the pallet regardless of how complete the remaining fifteen sections are.
Where is regulatory status recorded for nitric acid …% [C > 70 %]?
Whether CAS 7697-37-2 carries obligations beyond classification — candidate list entry, authorisation, restriction — belongs in section 15. Customers increasingly request a written statement on this point before placing an order, and the sheet is the natural place for it.
What is the EC number for nitric acid …% [C > 70 %]?
Alongside CAS 7697-37-2, this substance carries EC number 231-714-2 and Annex VI index 007-004-00-1. European documentation is built around the EC number as often as around the CAS: registration dossiers, the candidate list and customs systems key on it. A safety data sheet quoting only one of the two forces every downstream reader to look up the other.
What Annex VI notes and concentration limits apply to nitric acid …% [C > 70 %]?
The Annex VI entry for CAS 7697-37-2 carries note B. Notes are not commentary: they modify how the classification applies — to concentration ranges, to specific forms of the substance, or to the labelling that follows from it. An entry read without its notes is read incompletely. The register also records Ox. Liq. 3;H272: C ≥ 65.0%;inhalation: ATE = 2.65 mg/L vapours;Skin Corr. 1A;H314: C ≥ 20.0%;Skin Corr. 1B;H314: 5.0% ≤ C < 20.0% for this entry. Specific concentration limits, M-factors and acute toxicity estimates override the generic cut-off values, so a mixture calculation that ignores them will classify the mixture wrongly in both directions.
Protective equipment and exposure controls
Section 8 outlines exposure controls and personal protective equipment (PPE) for nitric acid …% [C > 70 %]: appropriate glove materials, eye protection, respiratory protection when warranted by the hazard classification, and any established occupational exposure limits. The choice of glove material is more critical than merely wearing gloves; nitrile gloves are not universally suitable.
What concentration limits apply to nitric acid …% [C > 70 %]?
The harmonised entry for nitric acid …% [C > 70 %] carries specific concentration limits: C ≤ 70 %; H272: C ≥ 65 %; H314: C ≥ 20 %; H314: 5 % ≤ C < 20 %. These override the generic cut-off values, so a mixture containing nitric acid …% [C > 70 %] is classified against these figures and not against the default thresholds. Acute toxicity estimate stated in the register: inhalation: ATE = 2,65 mg/L.
Which GHS pictograms apply to nitric acid …% [C > 70 %]?
The label for nitric acid …% [C > 70 %] carries GHS03 (flame over circle), GHS05 (corrosion), GHS06 (skull and crossbones), with the signal word Danger. These are not chosen by the supplier: CLP Annex VI states them for CAS 7697-37-2, and the precedence rules in Annex I decide which pictogram is dropped when two would say the same thing. A label showing a different set from the register is wrong even if every hazard statement on it is correct.
What must the label for nitric acid …% [C > 70 %] contain?
The supply label for nitric acid …% [C > 70 %] is generated from the same classification that drives the safety data sheet: pictograms selected by precedence, one signal word derived from the highest hazard class present, and the hazard statements H272, H330, H314 reproduced in full. Where the container is too small to carry the complete set at a legible size, there are lawful ways to handle it and unlawful ones that look identical to a non-specialist.
What happens if a consignment of nitric acid …% [C > 70 %] is refused?
A rejected document is typically complete and well-formatted but may be outdated or contain an incorrect consignment identifier. When a shipment of nitric acid …% [C > 70 %] is refused, the authority’s notice usually specifies the faulty section. Examining this notice is more efficient than revisiting the entire file.
How is nitric acid …% [C > 70 %] classified for road, sea and air transport?
Carriers and forwarders handling nitric acid …% [C > 70 %] compare section 14 against the shipping papers before loading. Any disagreement stops the consignment at the point where correcting it is most expensive.
What is the UN number for nitric acid …% [C > 70 %]?
For carriage, nitric acid …% [C > 70 %] is assigned UN 2031, transport class 8, packing group II, with subsidiary risk 5.1. These entries belong in section 14 of the safety data sheet and must match the shipping papers exactly. A consignment where the sheet and the transport document disagree on the UN number is stopped before anyone reads the remaining fifteen sections.
Disposal route and waste classification
Waste generated from nitric acid …% [C > 70 %] must be classified by the waste holder, but the classification sheet needs to provide the information that this classification is based on. Therefore, sections 13 and 2 are read together, and any discrepancy between them is considered a defect.
Can I import nitric acid …% [C > 70 %] into the EU?
An import of CAS 7697-37-2 is successful or unsuccessful based on whether the accompanying document matches the register entry. Among substances listed in CLP Annex VI, a common failure arises from classification carried over from a supplier outside the Union, where the same substance may be classified differently. The binding reference is index 007-004-00-1, and discrepancies occur in regulated consignments.
What is the CLP classification of nitric acid …% [C > 70 %]?
The harmonised classification for CAS 7697-37-2 carries 3 hazard statements: H272, H330, H314. In plain terms this means may intensify fire; oxidiser; fatal if inhaled; causes severe skin burns and eye damage. A harmonised entry is binding across the Union — an importer may not soften it, and a self-classification that diverges from it will not survive an enforcement check.
Identifiers that must agree
The CAS 7697-37-2 number and index number 007-004-00-1 are not interchangeable or decorative elements; they serve distinct purposes. The index number connects to the harmonised classification system, whereas the CAS number links to chemical literature. A document containing one without the other requires readers to independently reconstruct this relationship, which may lead to errors during reconstruction.
Questions about documentation for nitric acid …% [C > 70 %]
In which language must the sheet be supplied?
In an official language of each Member State where nitric acid …% [C > 70 %] is placed on the market, unless that State has stated otherwise.
Can I check whether my existing sheet is still valid?
Yes. A section-by-section reading against Annex II and the current harmonised entry establishes that in one pass, and a sheet that passes is reported as passing.
Do I need a safety data sheet to import nitric acid …% [C > 70 %] into the EU?
Yes. A sheet compiled to Annex II of REACH must exist before the first consignment moves, and it must be held by the entity placing the substance on the Union market.
What is the CAS number of nitric acid …% [C > 70 %]?
CAS 7697-37-2. In CLP Annex VI the same substance carries index number 007-004-00-1, and both identifiers should appear in the documentation.
MolGod.org issues documentation and does not sell, supply or ship chemical substances. CAS 7697-37-2 identifies the subject of this document.
Which version do you need?
📄
SDS Working Draft
€49.99
Delivered automatically after payment, by e-mail
Full 16-section REACH Annex II structure
Classification against ECHA CLP Annex VI
Public-source data with references
Unresolved gaps flagged, never filled by guesswork
For internal drafting and supplier review. Unsigned; supplier-specific fields may need completing.
Best for
Seeing what the document will contain before you commit
Comparing what a supplier sent you against the register
Finding the gaps in a sheet you already hold
Preparing an internal file before an export decision
Substances you handle but do not yet sell
Recommended when the document leaves your company✍
Expert-Reviewed SDS
€249.99
Everything in the Working Draft
Reviewed by a competent person under Annex II, section by section
Adapted to your company, product grade and identified use
Destination market and language checked
Transport section reviewed for the mode you request
Five rounds of corrections applied to your instructions
Within 72 hours of receiving complete input.
Best for
Any document that leaves your company
A customer or distributor who asked for the sheet
Paperwork travelling with an export shipment
A sheet an inspector or authority may read
Replacing a sheet a customer has already rejected
If you are unsure, read down the left column and stop at the first line that describes your situation.
What the document is for
Working Draft €49.99
Expert-Reviewed €249.99
Internal drafting and review
Yes
Yes
Checking a sheet a supplier sent you
Yes
Yes
Sent to your customer
Not written for this
Yes
Travels with an export shipment
Not written for this
Yes
Read by an inspector or authority
Not written for this
Yes
Adapted to your company, grade and identified use
No
Yes
Signed and dated by the reviewer
No
Yes
When you get it
Immediately after payment
Within 72 hours of complete input
Nothing stops you sending a draft to anyone. "Not written for this" means exactly that: it carries no signature and no fields adapted to your company, so it will not answer the questions the recipient is about to ask.
What the signature means
Who prepares the document
The document is generated by the MolGod engine from ECHA CLP Annex VI and the cited public sources, then read section by section by a qualified scientific reviewer with a degree in chemistry or a related scientific field.
What the review covers
The sheet is read section by section against the REACH Annex II structure. GHS classification and transport entries are checked against the sources cited in the document, and the sheet is adapted to the company, product grade and identified use you provide.
What is NOT verified
We do not test your material and we cannot confirm what is physically in your container: composition, concentration, impurities or manufacturing route. Those come from you and are reproduced as supplied.
What the signature is — and is not
The signature records that a qualified scientific reviewer read the document. It is not a government approval, not an ECHA approval, and not a legal certification — no such certification exists for safety data sheets in the EU. A signature does not by itself make a document legally valid or make your business compliant.
What you receive
A PDF in the 16-section REACH Annex II structure, signed and dated, with version information and a list of anything we could not establish. Five rounds of corrections are included.
Delivery
Within 72 hours of receiving complete input from you. The clock pauses whenever we are waiting on an answer.
Refunds
Full refund before review begins. If the evidence is insufficient, you choose a refund, store credit or a gap report. See the refund policy.
No fabricated-data guarantee.
If the available evidence is insufficient to support a defensible document for this CAS number and your product specification, we will not invent the missing values. You may choose a refund, store credit or a documented gap report.
The supplier placing the substance or mixture on the market remains responsible for ensuring that the final safety data sheet matches the material, its identified uses and their legal role in the supply chain.
CRC Handbook 91st ed. Lide, David R., ed. 2010. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 91st ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
CRC Handbook 105th ed. Haynes, William M., David R. Lide, and Thomas J. Bruno, eds. 2024. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 105th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
NIST WebBook — link Linstrom, Peter J., and William G. Mallard, eds. 2024. NIST Chemistry WebBook. NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
PubChem CID 944 — link Kim, Sunghwan, Jie Chen, Tiejun Cheng, Asta Gindulyte, Jia He, Siqian He, Qingliang Li, et al. 2023. "PubChem 2023 update." Nucleic Acids Research 51 (D1): D1373-D1380. PubChem CID 944.
IUPAC Serjeant, E. P., and Boyd Dempsey. 1979. Ionisation Constants of Organic Acids in Aqueous Solution. IUPAC Chemical Data Series No. 23. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Bibliografia metody (Chicago)
Henderson, L. J. 1908. "Concerning the Relationship between the Strength of Acids and Their Capacity to Preserve Neutrality." American Journal of Physiology 21 (4): 173-179.
Hasselbalch, K. A. 1917. "Die Berechnung der Wasserstoffzahl des Blutes aus der freien und gebundenen Kohlensäure desselben." Biochemische Zeitschrift 78: 112-144.
Po, Henry N., and N. M. Senozan. 2001. "The Henderson-Hasselbalch Equation: Its History and Limitations." Journal of Chemical Education 78 (11): 1499-1503.
Avdeef, Alex. 2012. "Absorption and Drug Development: Solubility, Permeability, and Charge State." 2nd ed. Wiley.
Avdeef, Alex. 2007. "Solubility of sparingly-soluble ionizable drugs." Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 59 (7): 568-590.
Volgyi, Gergely, et al. 2007. "Potentiometric and spectrophotometric pKa determination of water-insoluble compounds." Analytica Chimica Acta 583 (2): 418-428.
Fini, Adamo, Giuseppe Fazio, and Giuseppina Feroci. 1997. "Solubility and solubilization properties of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs." Pharmaceutica Acta Helvetiae 70 (4): 305-318.
Mauger, John W., Anthony N. Paruta, and Robert J. Gerraughty. 1972. "Solubilities of sulfadiazine, sulfisomidine, and sulfadimethoxine." Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 61 (1): 94-97.
Lyman, Warren J., William F. Reehl, and David H. Rosenblatt. 1990. "Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Methods." American Chemical Society.
Marcus, Yizhak. 1998. "The Properties of Solvents." Wiley.
Serjeant, E. P., and Boyd Dempsey. 1979. Ionisation Constants of Organic Acids in Aqueous Solution. IUPAC Chemical Data Series No. 23. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Perrin, Douglas D. 1965. Dissociation Constants of Organic Bases in Aqueous Solution. IUPAC. London: Butterworths.
Goldberg, Robert N., Nand Kishore, and Rebecca Lennen. 2002. "Thermodynamic Quantities for the Ionization Reactions of Buffers." Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data 31 (2): 231-370.
Rumble, John R., Thomas J. Bruno, Maria J. Doa, and Donald R. Burgess, eds. 2024. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 105th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Lide, David R., ed. 2010. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 91st ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Kim, Sunghwan, Jie Chen, Tiejun Cheng, Asta Gindulyte, Jia He, Siqian He, Qingliang Li, et al. 2023. "PubChem 2023 update." Nucleic Acids Research 51 (D1): D1373-D1380.
Knox, Craig, Mike Wilson, Christen M. Klinger, Mark Franklin, Eponine Oler, Alex Wilson, Allison Pon, et al. 2024. "DrugBank 6.0: the DrugBank Knowledgebase for 2024." Nucleic Acids Research 52 (D1): D1265-D1275.
Zdrazil, Barbara, Eloy Felix, Fiona Hunter, Emma J. Manners, James Blackshaw, Sybilla Corbett, Marleen de Veij, et al. 2024. "The ChEMBL Database in 2023." Nucleic Acids Research 52 (D1): D1180-D1192.
Kanehisa, Minoru, Miho Furumichi, Yoko Sato, Masayuki Kawashima, and Mari Ishiguro-Watanabe. 2023. "KEGG for taxonomy-based analysis of pathways and genomes." Nucleic Acids Research 51 (D1): D587-D592.
Linstrom, Peter J., and William G. Mallard, eds. 2024. NIST Chemistry WebBook. NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Nelson, David L., and Michael M. Cox. 2017. Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry. 7th ed. New York: W. H. Freeman.
📄 Certificates of Analysis (CoA)CAS 7697-37-2none
No certificates for this product in the database.
📚 Scientific references (Chicago Author-Date) — click to expand
Batch management and laboratory certification standards — 13 independent sources (ICH Q1/Q3/Q6/Q7/Q10 + ISO 17025 + WHO TRS + 21 CFR 211 + EMA + USP + Ph.Eur. + PIC/S + IPEC-PQG).
International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). 2000. "Q7 Good Manufacturing Practice Guide for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients." ICH Expert Working Group. [link ↗] — GMP for APIs — adopted by EMA, FDA, MHLW
International Organization for Standardization. 2017. "ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories." ISO. [link ↗] — Lab accreditation standard underpinning every CoA
World Health Organization. 2010. "WHO Good Manufacturing Practices for Pharmaceutical Products: Main Principles (WHO Technical Report Series No. 957, Annex 3)." WHO Press. [link ↗] — WHO TRS No. 957 — global reference for GMP
International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). 2003. "ICH Q1A(R2): Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products." International Council for Harmonisation. [link ↗] — Source for batch shelf-life and retest dating
International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). 2006. "ICH Q3A(R2): Impurities in New Drug Substances." ICH. [link ↗]
International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). 1999. "ICH Q6A: Specifications for New Drug Substances and Products." ICH. [link ↗] — CoA acceptance-criteria specification standard
International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). 2008. "ICH Q10: Pharmaceutical Quality System." ICH. [link ↗]
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 2024. "21 CFR Part 211: Current Good Manufacturing Practice for Finished Pharmaceuticals." US Code of Federal Regulations. [link ↗] — US legal mandate (Subpart J — Records and Reports)
European Medicines Agency. 2014. "Guideline on Process Validation for Finished Products — Information and Data to Be Provided EMA/CHMP/CVMP/QWP/BWP/70278/2012." European Medicines Agency. [link ↗]
United States Pharmacopeial Convention. 2024. "United States Pharmacopeia and National Formulary, USP 47-NF 42." USP. [link ↗]
European Pharmacopoeia Commission. 2024. "European Pharmacopoeia 11th Edition." Council of Europe — EDQM. [link ↗]
Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme (PIC/S). 2021. "Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products PE 009-15." PIC/S Secretariat, Geneva. [link ↗] — Cross-recognized GMP for 54 inspectorates worldwide
International Pharmaceutical Excipients Council (IPEC) and Pharmaceutical Quality Group (PQG). 2017. "Joint IPEC-PQG Good Manufacturing Practices Guide for Pharmaceutical Excipients." IPEC-Americas. [link ↗] — Excipient-grade CoA standard for non-API ingredients
Source: RTECS QU5775000; OSHA Chemical Database 2024 (2024). CAS 7697-37-2.
LD50/LC50 data are for guidance only; they do not replace the safety data sheet (SDS) or expert toxicological assessment. GHS classification for the oral route (mg/kg bw) per UN GHS, 10th rev. 2023, Annex 1 §3.1.1.
Bibliography (Chicago)
NIOSH. Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances (RTECS). Cincinnati: NIOSH.
United Nations. 2023. "Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS)." 10th rev. ed. New York: UN.
Hodge, Harold C., and James H. Sterner. 1949. "Tabulation of toxicity classes." American Industrial Hygiene Association Quarterly 10 (4): 93-96.
Further sources (methodology, not cited directly):
U.S. EPA. 2024. "ChemView." https://chemview.epa.gov/.
Lipnick, Robert L., et al. 1995. "Comparison of the up-and-down, conventional LD50, and fixed-dose acute toxicity procedures." Food and Chemical Toxicology 33 (3): 223-231.
ATSDR. 2024. "Toxicological Profiles." Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/.
Hayes, Wallace, and Claire L. Kruger, eds. 2014. "Hayes' Principles and Methods of Toxicology." 6th ed. CRC Press.
Lewis, Richard J. 2012. "Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials." 12th ed. Wiley.
IARC. 2024. "Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans." International Agency for Research on Cancer (classification criteria for carcinogenicity: IARC Group 1/2A/2B).
Pohanish, Richard P. 2017. "Sittig's Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens." 7th ed. Elsevier.
Bingham, Eula, Barbara Cohrssen, and Charles H. Powell, eds. 2012. "Patty's Toxicology." 6th ed. Wiley.
WHO. 2023. "Recommended Classification of Pesticides by Hazard." World Health Organization (zgodne z UN GHS Annex 1 §3.1.1).
📜 Patents (public metadata)
no data
No public patent metadata was found for this substance in Crossref / OpenAlex at this time. Data will be updated automatically after the next cache refresh (24h).
📚 References (Chicago Author-Date) — click to expand
Junhu Wu, Dehua Xu, Xiushan Yang et al.. (2023). "Determination and Correlation of Vapor–Liquid Equilibria for the Nitric Acid + Water, Nitric Acid + Water + Phosphoric Acid, and Nitric Acid + Water + Phosphoric Acid + Sulfuric Acid System". Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.2c00718
Paul Duval. (2018). "Safety Evaluation of Nitric Acid Reactions with Polysaccharides". https://doi.org/10.2172/1467250
Frank Huess Hedlund, Merete Folmer Nielsen, Sonja Hagen Mikkelsen et al.. (2014). "Violent explosion after inadvertent mixing of nitric acid and isopropanol – Review 15years later finds basic accident data corrupted, no evidence of broad learning". Safety Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.06.010
L. M. Ferris. (1961). "Solubility of Molybdic Oxide and Its Hydrates in Nitric Acid, Nitric Acid-Ferric Nitrate, and Nitric Acid-Uranyl Nitrate Solutions.". Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data. https://doi.org/10.1021/je60011a035
World Intellectual Property Organization. 2024. "Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)." https://www.wipo.int/pct/.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. 2024. "USPTO Patent Public Search." https://ppubs.uspto.gov/.
European Patent Office. 2024. "Espacenet Patent Search." https://worldwide.espacenet.com/.
Newman, David J., and Gordon M. Cragg. 2020. "Natural Products as Sources of New Drugs over the Nearly Four Decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019." Journal of Natural Products 83 (3): 770-803.
Davies, Mark, Michał Nowotka, George Papadatos, et al. 2015. "ChEMBL Web Services: Streamlining Access to Drug Discovery Data and Utilities." Nucleic Acids Research 43 (W1): W612-W620.
Bickerton, G. Richard, Gaia V. Paolini, Jérémy Besnard, Sorel Muresan, and Andrew L. Hopkins. 2012. "Quantifying the Chemical Beauty of Drugs." Nature Chemistry 4 (2): 90-98.
Meanwell, Nicholas A. 2011. "Synopsis of Some Recent Tactical Application of Bioisosteres in Drug Design." Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 54 (8): 2529-2591.
Ertl, Peter, and Ansgar Schuffenhauer. 2009. "Estimation of Synthetic Accessibility Score of Drug-Like Molecules Based on Molecular Complexity and Fragment Contributions." Journal of Cheminformatics 1: 8.
Hopkins, Andrew L., and Colin R. Groom. 2002. "The Druggable Genome." Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 1 (9): 727-730.
Allison, John R., and Mark A. Lemley. 1998. "Empirical Evidence on the Validity of Litigated Patents." AIPLA Quarterly Journal 26 (3): 185-275.
Patani, George A., and Edmond J. LaVoie. 1996. "Bioisosterism: A Rational Approach in Drug Design." Chemical Reviews 96 (8): 3147-3176.
Lerner, Josh. 1994. "The Importance of Patent Scope: An Empirical Analysis." RAND Journal of Economics 25 (2): 319-333.
Have a blog, forum or scientific service? Embed the interactive 3D molecule on your website — every reader will see it, with a link below to the safety data sheet for that substance.
🔗 HTML iframe code (easiest — works everywhere)
Copy and paste into your site's HTML editor:
Adjust width and height to your layout.
⚙ WordPress Shortcode (for other shops with MOL-GOD)
🌐 Direct link (for emails, chats, LinkedIn, Twitter)
When you share the link, Facebook/LinkedIn/Discord will automatically fetch the image preview:
📋 License: The embed keeps a backlink to MolGod (required — the shop is the data source). Chemical data comes from PubChem (CC0 — public domain). The embed is FREE for educational, commercial and hobby use.
📚 REFERENCES (Aggregate bibliography, Chicago Author-Date) 79 items
All scientific sources cited in the accordions above for CAS 7697-37-2. Format: Chicago Manual of Style 17th ed., Author-Date system.
AIST. n.d. Spectral Database for Organic Compounds (SDBS): CAS 7697-37-2. Tsukuba, Japan: National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology. https://sdbs.db.aist.go.jp/.
Linstrom, Peter J., and William G. Mallard, eds. n.d. NIST Chemistry WebBook: NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.18434/T4D303.
PubChem. n.d. PubChem Compound Summary: CAS 7697-37-2. Bethesda, MD: National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), National Library of Medicine. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/#query=7697-37-2.
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). 2024. "Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP) — Harmonised Classification and Labelling." ECHA, Helsinki / Official Journal of the European Union. https://echa.europa.eu/regulations/clp/clp-classification.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 2017. "Recommendations for Chemical Protective Clothing: A Companion to the NIOSH Pocket Guide." U.S. Department of Health & Human Services / CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ncpc/default.html.
Connors, Kenneth A., Gordon L. Amidon, and Valentino J. Stella. 1986. Chemical Stability of Pharmaceuticals: A Handbook for Pharmacists, 2nd ed.. New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471734683.
Rumble, John R., ed. 2019. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics: 100th Edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. https://hbcp.chemnetbase.com/.
Stefanis, Emmanuel, and Costas Panayiotou. 2008. "Prediction of Hansen Solubility Parameters with a New Group-Contribution Method." International Journal of Thermophysics 29: 568-585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-008-0415-z.
Stoll, Vincent S., and John S. Blanchard. 1990. "Buffers: Principles and Practice: In Methods in Enzymology, vol. 182." San Diego: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(90)82008-P.
European Parliament. 2008. "Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP)." Official Journal of the European Union L 353: 1–1355.
United Nations. 2021. Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS). 9th revised ed. ST/SG/AC.10/30/Rev.9. New York and Geneva: United Nations. https://unece.org/ghs-rev9-2021.
United States Pharmacopeial Convention. 2024. "USP <621> Chromatography." In United States Pharmacopeia and National Formulary, USP 47-NF 42. Rockville, MD: USP. https://www.uspnf.com/.
International Organization for Standardization. 2017. "ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories." Geneva: ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/66912.html.
Kolthoff, Izaak Maurits, and Philip J. Elving, eds. 1978. Treatise on Analytical Chemistry, Part I: Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
Skoog, Douglas A., F. James Holler, and Stanley R. Crouch. 2018. Principles of Instrumental Analysis. 7th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning.
Christian, Gary D., Purnendu K. Dasgupta, and Kevin A. Schug. 2014. Analytical Chemistry. 7th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
International Organization for Standardization. 1994. "ISO 5725-2:1994 Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods and Results — Part 2: Basic Method for the Determination of Repeatability and Reproducibility of a Standard Measurement Method." Geneva: ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/11834.html.
Heckert, N. A., and J. J. Filliben. 2003. "NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook of Statistical Methods." NIST Handbook 151. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/.
Grubbs, Frank E. 1950. "Sample Criteria for Testing Outlying Observations." Annals of Mathematical Statistics 21 (1): 27–58.
Dixon, Wilfrid J. 1950. "Analysis of Extreme Values." Annals of Mathematical Statistics 21 (4): 488–506.
Snedecor, George W., and William G. Cochran. 1989. Statistical Methods. 8th ed. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
Student [William Sealy Gosset]. 1908. "The Probable Error of a Mean." Biometrika 6 (1): 1–25.
International Organization for Standardization. 2005. "ISO 3534-1:2006 Statistics — Vocabulary and Symbols — Part 1: General Statistical Terms and Terms Used in Probability." Geneva: ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/40145.html.
Thompson, Michael, Stephen L. R. Ellison, and Roger Wood. 2002. "Harmonized Guidelines for Single-Laboratory Validation of Methods of Analysis." Pure and Applied Chemistry 74 (5): 835–855.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. 2024. European Agreement Concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR), Applicable as from 1 January 2025 (ECE/TRANS/352). Geneva: UNECE. https://unece.org/transport/dangerous-goods/adr-2025-edition.
Ministerstwo Klimatu i Środowiska Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. 2020. "Rozporządzenie Ministra Klimatu z dnia 2 stycznia 2020 r. w sprawie katalogu odpadów." Dziennik Ustaw RP 2020 poz. 10. https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20200000010. National rules — Poland
Główny Inspektorat Ochrony Środowiska (GIOŚ). 2024. "Baza Danych O Odpadach (BDO) — System rejestracji firm utylizacyjnych." Ministerstwo Klimatu i Środowiska. https://bdo.mos.gov.pl/. National rules — Poland
International Organization for Standardization. 2017. "ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories." ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/66912.html.
World Health Organization. 2010. "WHO Good Manufacturing Practices for Pharmaceutical Products: Main Principles (WHO Technical Report Series No. 957, Annex 3)." WHO Press. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/trs957-annex3.
Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme (PIC/S). 2021. "Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products PE 009-15." PIC/S Secretariat, Geneva. https://picscheme.org/en/publications.
![Nitric acid …% [C > 70 %] (CAS 7697-37-2) - CAS 7697-37-2 - HNO3](https://molgod.org/wp-content/uploads/mol-god/img/nitric-acid-c-70-cas-7697-37-2-cas-7697-37-2.png)
