Safety data sheet documentation for methanol (CAS 67-56-1), compiled to REACH Annex II with classification read against the harmonised entry in CLP Annex VI (H225, H331, H311, H301). Two options: a working draft sent by e-mail immediately, or a signed card issued within 72 hours of complete input. The item supplied is a document — MolGod.org does not sell, supply or ship chemical substances.
Free, and generated automatically from the sources listed on this page. No person has reviewed it, and it describes the substance in general — not your material, your process or your intended market.
Section 9 — physicochemical properties: 14 of 22 established.
We show what is established and name what is not. Classification and identity are complete on every card; section 9 is where public data is thin.
Identity, structure, physical and chemical properties, analytical data and the literature — every value with the source it came from and the date that source was read. The full record is in the data sections further down this page.
Identity CAS · EC · IUPAC · synonyms · molecular formula · molecular weight
Structure 2D · 3D · SMILES · InChI · InChIKey
Physical melting point · boiling point · density · vapour pressure · solubility
Chemical reactivity · stability · incompatible materials
Analytical spectra and methods where available
References literature, with DOI where a DOI exists
Identifier coverage is shown as a count, not as a quality rating. It tells you how well characterised this substance is in public data — which is a different question from how good it is, and a more useful one when you are deciding whether the documentation behind it can be defended.
This page sells the documentation for this substance, not the substance. Choose the level you need.
€0Audit the sheet you already haveSend us your existing sheet for this substance and we tell you what is wrong with it. One per company. If it turns out to be sound, you buy nothing.Start the free audit →
€49.99Working draftThe complete sixteen-section document, referenced, downloadable immediately after checkout. The right choice while the paperwork is still moving.
€249.99Signed cardThe same document reviewed and signed, issued within 72 hours of complete input — for the moment somebody official asks who stands behind it.
Documentation available for this substance: safety data sheet · CLP label · certificate of analysis on request · specification. Languages: the official language of your destination market, produced per card.
Grade, purity, physical form, packaging, minimum order and lead time are not shown, because MolGod does not supply the material — those are facts about a seller, and there is no seller on this page. They appear on storefronts we build for suppliers, where somebody can answer for them.
What a compliance officer checks, and where it sits in the document. The values themselves are in the regulatory sections further down.
Classification harmonised entry with index number where one exists; self-classification shown separately and labelled, never merged
Hazard statements the official text, in the page language
Precautionary statements combined statements reproduced whole, never split
Pictograms and signal word
Inventory status per jurisdiction, each stated individually
Restrictions entry and scope where one applies
Authorisation entry and sunset date where one applies
Candidate list status and the supply-chain duty it triggers
Transport entry per mode — road, sea, air
Exposure limits per country, each naming the act it comes from
Document status revision date and the amendment in force when issued
Fields with no established status say so. This page never states that no restrictions apply — absence from a dataset is not clearance, and a document that treats it as clearance is the most dangerous kind of document in this field.
A digital PDF safety data sheet in the sixteen-section structure of REACH Annex II (Regulation 1907/2006).
Substance identification, hazard classification, physicochemical, toxicological and ecological information, and regulatory references.
Classification read against the harmonised entry in CLP Annex VI where one exists for the substance.
A version number, a compilation date, and the source behind each value that carries one.
Delivery by e-mail. Nothing is shipped.
What this is not
Not a chemical substance, not a sample, not any physical goods.
Not a certification. No official certification scheme for safety data sheets exists in the European Union.
Not legal approval, and not a guarantee of compliance in any jurisdiction.
Not a substitute for your own regulatory assessment, nor for the safety data sheet supplied by the manufacturer or importer of the substance you actually hold.
Not adapted to a specific workplace, process or national annex unless you provide that information.
Where the available evidence does not support a value, the sheet states that the value is not established rather than estimating one. A field with no recorded source is marked as such.
What is in the buyer pack
Everything your compliance officer will ask for, in one file.
The product page as PDF — the record as published, so what you forward matches what you read.
The safety data sheet at your entitlement level — sixteen sections in the order set by REACH Annex II, for this substance, in the language you select.
The CLP label artwork — generated from the same classification as the sheet, so the two cannot disagree.
The specification, and the certificate of analysis where batch data exists.
sources.txt — every citation with the date it was read.
An explicit list of what we could not establish — fields marked unavailable rather than filled with an estimate. This is the honest part of the document and we do not hide it in a footnote.
Your European buyer is going to forward this to somebody who was not on the call. The pack exists so that what they forward is complete, self-explanatory and traceable — rather than four attachments and a sentence beginning “I think this is everything”.
These switch the language of this page. Single substances. Mixtures on enquiry. One document, one language — additional languages are priced separately. Every version, including the Chinese one, is written to EU law — (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) Annex II and (EU) 2020/878 — and translated from it. The Chinese version is a reference translation, not a legally valid document for the Chinese market: an SDS for China must be compiled separately to GB/T 16483 and GB/T 17519.
3D model Methanol, CAS 67-56-1, molecular formula CH4O, molar mass 32.04 g/mol
Data transcribed from regulatory registers and technical literature, with the source and edition stated. It does not replace the supplier's safety data sheet. Fields without a recorded source are marked as such.
📊 Physicochemical data — CAS 67-56-1
📊Physicochemical properties
Quick Reference
Formula:CH₄O
MW:32.042 g/mol
CAS:67-56-1
Appearance:Colorless liquid
Odour:Slight alcoholic odor when pure; repulsive, pungent odor when crude
Detailed Properties
Supplements the “Physical & Chemical Properties (DB)” table below — values already shown there are not repeated.
Property
Value
Unit
Conditions
Source
Refractive Index (nD)
1.3284
20 °C, D-line
Reid, Prausnitz, Poling 4th ed. (1987)
🔬 Advanced Properties
Chemical Identifiers
SMILES:CO
Data sources:
Reid, Prausnitz, Poling 4th ed. (1987) (ISBN 9780070517998)
Last updated: 2026-08-25
📐Physical & Chemical Properties (DB)
23 fields MolGod Score: Primary
DECHEMA, PTB, and BAM. CHEMSAFE - Database of Evaluated Safety Characteristics for the Avoidance of Explosions. Frankfurt am Main: DECHEMA e.V.; Braunschweig/Berlin: Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt and Bundesanstalt fur Materialforschung und -prufung. ↗
applies to: Melting point · Boiling point · Density (ρ)
NIST. Chemistry WebBook, SRD 69. National Institute of Standards and Technology. ↗
applies to: Melting point · Boiling point
Sangster, J. "Octanol-Water Partition Coefficients of Simple Organic Compounds." Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data 18, no. 3 (1989): 1111-1229. ↗
applies to: logP (octanol/water)
Physicochemical values are derived from the independent, peer-reviewed sources listed above.
PubChem. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NIH/NLM), chemical compound database. ↗
applies to: Molecular formula · Molecular weight · LogP (lipophilicity) · IUPAC name · SMILES · InChIKey
DECHEMA, PTB, and BAM. CHEMSAFE - Database of Evaluated Safety Characteristics for the Avoidance of Explosions. Frankfurt am Main: DECHEMA e.V.; Braunschweig/Berlin: Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt and Bundesanstalt fur Materialforschung und -prufung. ↗
applies to: Melting point · Boiling point · Density
NIST. Chemistry WebBook, SRD 69. National Institute of Standards and Technology. ↗
applies to: Melting point · Boiling point
et al.. (2009). "Suicide attempt using pure methanol with hospitalization of the patient soon after ingestion: case report.". https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-31802009000200011
MOLECULE
Per-CAS bibliography (live from 13+ databases)
Sources: db:Europe PMC (1)
db:Europe PMC
et al.. (2009). "Suicide attempt using pure methanol with hospitalization of the patient soon after ingestion: case report.". https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-31802009000200011 →
Regulatory status of the substance
Inventories: EU/SVHC, US/TSCA, CA / NDSL, AU/AICS. Regulatory information — does not restrict purchase in this store.
🧮 Stoichiometry Calculator
🧪 Chemical Data
CAS Number
67-56-1
Molecular formula
CH4O
Molar mass
32.04 g/mol
IUPAC name (EN)
methanol
SMILES
CO
InChIKey
OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N
📡 Data sources
The data in this widget comes from the following verified scientific sources:
PubChem — National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI/NIH), USA
ChEMBL — European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), UK
NIST WebBook — National Institute of Standards and Technology, USA
Data is cached locally for speed — the widget also works offline.
⚗️ Physicochemical properties
Density
0.7918 g/cm³ @ 20°C
Source: PubChem, NIST WebBook. Last updated: 2026-08-25
PubChem. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NIH/NLM), chemical compound database. ↗
applies to: PubChem CID · InChIKey · InChI · SMILES
ECHA. EC Inventory — EINECS, ELINCS, NLP and List Numbers assigned under REACH. Helsinki: European Chemicals Agency. ↗
applies to: EC Number
ChemSpider. Royal Society of Chemistry, chemical structure database. ↗
applies to: ChemSpider
Further reading
Publications thematically related to this CAS. They are not the source of any value shown on this card.
Extended Bibliography (5)
★★★★★CANONICAL_PAPERS💰 Paywall (probable)✓ verifiedBehrens, M.; Studt, F.; Kasatkin, I.; Kühl, S.; Hävecker, M. et al.. 2014. "The active site of methanol synthesis over Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 industrial catalysts." Science.link[accessed: 2026-10-11]
★★★★★CANONICAL_PAPERS💰 Paywall (probable)✓ verifiedOlah, G.A.. 2005. "Beyond oil and gas: the methanol economy." Angewandte Chemie International Edition.link[accessed: 2026-10-11]
★★★★☆CANONICAL_PAPERS💰 Paywall (probable)✓ verifiedWang, M.L.; Wang, J.T.; Choong, Y.M.. 2002. "A rapid and accurate method for determination of methanol in alcoholic beverages using headspace gas chromatography." Journal of Food and Drug Analysis.link[accessed: 2026-10-11]
★☆☆☆☆CANONICAL_PAPERS❓ ?✓ verifiedBertau, M.; Offermanns, H.; Plass, L.; Schmidt, F.; Wernicke, H.-J. (eds.). 2017. "Methanol: The Basic Chemical and Energy Feedstock of the Future." Springer.link[accessed: 2026-10-11]
½☆☆☆☆CANONICAL_PAPERS❓ ?BASF / Mittasch, A.; Pier, M.. 1923. "Synthesis of methanol from CO and H2 (BASF high-pressure process patent)." German Patent DE 415686.[accessed: 2026-10-11]
📡 Spectroscopy — CAS 67-56-1
NMR spectroscopy — source records
Earlier NMR results on this page remain available: Live Spectra (NMRShiftDB card) and NMR Predictor (literature table).
Structure identity: OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N
For each record: MolGod’s status line, then the source record (as retrieved by MolGod), then MolGod’s own checks.
NMR deposited as experimental — measurement details incomplete
The source lists these spectra as experimental but does not report all measurement details; each spectrum states what is missing. Chemical shifts below come from the source record and are not reconstructed.
¹³C NMR
¹³C NMR — Experimental (measured); not reported by the source: solvent, temperature, spectrometer frequency — nmrshiftdb2:spectrum:10038673
δ (ppm)
Assignment (atoms)
Multiplicity
Assignment quality
50.5
C1
Q
exact
Values taken by the source from a reference book (secondary source).
Source
nmrshiftdb2
Spectrum ID
10038673
Solvent
not reported by the source
Temperature (K)
not reported by the source
Frequency (MHz)
not reported by the source
Publication
New York Thieme Verlag Stefan Berger; S. Braun; H.-O. Kalinowski 13-C-NMR-Spektroskopie 1984
Method
Source measurement type: not declared
Retrieved
2026-10-01T11:11:45Z
MolGod verification
experimental candidate by rule NMR-MEASCALC-1
Assignments
exact 1
¹³C NMR — Deposited as experimental; the source reports no measurement details (solvent, temperature, spectrometer frequency not reported) — nmrshiftdb2:spectrum:20078012
δ (ppm)
Assignment (atoms)
Multiplicity
Assignment quality
49.95
C1
Q
exact
Source
nmrshiftdb2
Spectrum ID
20078012
Solvent
not reported by the source
Temperature (K)
not reported by the source
Frequency (MHz)
not reported by the source
Publication
not reported by the source
Method
Source measurement type: not declared
Retrieved
2026-10-01T11:11:45Z
MolGod verification
experimental candidate by rule NMR-MEASCALC-1
Assignments
exact 1
Calculated / predicted NMR — not experimental measurements
Values below are calculated, not measured.
¹³C NMR
¹³C NMR — Predicted by ACD/Labs C+H NMR Predictors and DB, 2020.1.0 (calculated, not measured) — nmrshiftdb2:spectrum:60021655
δ (ppm)
Assignment (atoms)
Multiplicity
Assignment quality
49.62
C1
Q
exact
Source
nmrshiftdb2
Spectrum ID
60021655
Solvent
not reported by the source
Temperature (K)
not reported by the source
Frequency (MHz)
not reported by the source
Publication
not reported by the source
Method
Source method: ACD/Labs C+H NMR Predictors and DB, 2020.1.0 (calculated)
Retrieved
2026-10-01T11:11:45Z
MolGod verification
calculated (prediction) by rule NMR-MEASCALC-1
Assignments
exact 1
¹³C NMR — Predicted by HOSE code using nmrshiftdb2 data (calculated, not measured) — nmrshiftdb2:spectrum:70132520
δ (ppm)
Assignment (atoms)
Multiplicity
Assignment quality
50.23
C1
Q
exact
Source
nmrshiftdb2
Spectrum ID
70132520
Solvent
not reported by the source
Temperature (K)
not reported by the source
Frequency (MHz)
not reported by the source
Publication
not reported by the source
Method
Source method: HOSE code using nmrshiftdb2 data (calculated)
Retrieved
2026-10-01T11:11:45Z
MolGod verification
calculated (prediction) by rule NMR-MEASCALC-1
Assignments
exact 1
¹H NMR
No source record listed in this panel (NOT_FOUND).
Symmetry-equivalent atom groups (MolGod, from the three-dimensional structure)
National Institute of Standards and Technology. 2024. "NIST Chemistry WebBook, SRD 69." Gaithersburg, MD: NIST. Accessed 2025-01-01. ↗
Spectral Database for Organic Structure Determination (SDBS). 2024. National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Japan. Accessed 2025-01-01. ↗
Ulrich, Eldon L., Hideo Akutsu, John F. Doreleijers, Yoko Harano, Yannis E. Ioannidis, Jundong Lin, Miron Livny, et al. 2008. "BioMagResBank." Nucleic Acids Research 36 (D1): D402–D408. [DOI ↗]
Horai, Hisayuki, Masanori Arita, Shigehiko Kanaya, Yoshito Nihei, Tasuku Ikeda, Kazuhiro Suwa, Yuya Ojima, et al. 2010. "MassBank: A Public Repository for Sharing Mass Spectral Data for Life Sciences." Journal of Mass Spectrometry 45 (7): 703–714. [DOI ↗]
Linstrom, P.J., and W.G. Mallard, eds. 2024. NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. ↗
McDonald, M. Shane, Mike McAvoy, and Ajit Bhalerao. 1988. "JCAMP-DX: A Standard Form for Exchange of Infrared Spectra in Computer Readable Form." Applied Spectroscopy 42 (1): 151–162. [DOI ↗]
PubChem. 2024. "PubChem Compound Database." National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. Accessed 2025-01-01. ↗
Spectra are fetched on demand from 9 sources. Each spectrum is stored in our database — the next time it is opened there are zero requests to the external API. Download JCAMP-DX / CSV / PNG for every spectrum without searching.
Type of data: Predicted (calculated by nmrshiftdb2, not measured) — inferred: the source file carries no deposited measurement Basis: the file returned by the NMRShiftDB search-or-predict service is a JCAMP-DX LINK block with spectrometer frequency 0, and its values match no deposited NMRShiftDB spectrum of this compound on record at MolGod.
⏳ Loading…
▶ Click to load spectrum
🔗 Source
About the downloads (Type of data: Predicted (calculated by nmrshiftdb2, not measured) — inferred: the source file carries no deposited measurement) JCAMP: the NMRShiftDB file as received (JCAMP-DX 5.01 text). It is a peak list: chemical shift in ppm. MolGod adds header lines stating the type of data; the values are unchanged. CSV: the same peak list in two columns. The second column repeats the shift value; it is not a signal intensity. Lines starting with # state the type of data. PNG: a picture of the plot above, with the type of data written on it. Use: where signals are expected or were reported (chemical shift positions). Not included or guaranteed: intensities, multiplicities, coupling constants, line shapes, and solvent or temperature unless stated. A predicted list is not a measurement and cannot serve as a reference spectrum for identity or purity testing. Downloads become active after Show.
Data is fetched once (JCAMP-DX parser) and stored in the plugin's local database. No duplicate downloads, no NIST queries on subsequent openings. Licences respected (only a deep link plus our own visualisation is published).
Data retrieved live from multiple sources (priority chain). JCAMP-DX / CSV / PNG available for download under each spectrum.
IR — Fourier-transform infrared
Loading IR — Fourier-transform infrared…
MS — Mass spectrometry (EI 70eV)
Loading MS — Mass spectrometry (EI 70eV)…
NMR — literature reference values (tabulated)
Tabulated reference values (1H and 13C) for CAS 67-56-1. Literature sources: Gottlieb 1997, Pretsch 2009, Silverstein 2014.
Reference data from the literature. Verify against a reference spectrum before analytical use.
1H NMR (CDCl3)
δ (ppm)
Multiplicity
Integration
J (Hz)
Assignment
3.31
s
3
—
CH3OH (OMe)
Data source: Gottlieb 1997
Type of data: values cited from Gottlieb 1997; the record does not state whether each value was measured or calculated (may be measured or calculated).
13C NMR (CDCl3)
δ (ppm)
Multiplicity
Integration
J (Hz)
Assignment
49.00
s
—
—
CH3OH
Data source: Gottlieb 1997
Type of data: values cited from Gottlieb 1997; the record does not state whether each value was measured or calculated (may be measured or calculated).
Bibliography (Chicago author-date)
Aue, W. P., E. Bartholdi, and R. R. Ernst. 1976. "Two-Dimensional Spectroscopy. Application to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance." Journal of Chemical Physics 64 (5): 2229–2246. [DOI]
Bodenhausen, Geoffrey, and D. J. Ruben. 1980. "Natural Abundance Nitrogen-15 NMR by Enhanced Heteronuclear Spectroscopy." Chemical Physics Letters 69 (1): 185–189.
Bax, Ad, and Donald G. Davis. 1985. "MLEV-17-Based Two-Dimensional Homonuclear Magnetization Transfer Spectroscopy." Journal of Magnetic Resonance 65 (2): 355–360.
Gottlieb, Hugo E., Vadim Kotlyar, and Abraham Nudelman. 1997. "NMR Chemical Shifts of Common Laboratory Solvents as Trace Impurities." Journal of Organic Chemistry 62 (21): 7512–7515. [DOI]
Harris, Robin K., Edwin D. Becker, Sonia M. Cabral de Menezes, Pierre Granger, Roy E. Hoffman, and Kurt W. Zilm. 2008. "Further Conventions for NMR Shielding and Chemical Shifts (IUPAC Recommendations 2008)." Pure and Applied Chemistry 80 (1): 59–84. [DOI]
Fulmer, Gregory R., Alexander J. M. Miller, Nathaniel H. Sherden, Hugo E. Gottlieb, Abraham Nudelman, Brian M. Rosen, Virgil Percec, and Paul J. Chirik. 2010. "NMR Chemical Shifts of Common Laboratory Solvents as Trace Impurities." Organometallics 29 (9): 2176–2179. [DOI]
Levitt, Malcolm H. 2008. Spin Dynamics: Basics of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley. ISBN 978-0-470-51117-6
Friebolin, Horst. 2010. Basic One- and Two-Dimensional NMR Spectroscopy. 5th ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. ISBN 978-3-527-32782-9
Berger, Stefan, and Siegmar Braun. 2004. 200 and More NMR Experiments: A Practical Course. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. ISBN 978-3-527-31067-8
Sanders, Jeremy K. M., and Brian K. Hunter. 1993. Modern NMR Spectroscopy: A Guide for Chemists. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-855514-8
Bovey, Frank A., and Peter A. Mirau. 1996. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-119765-8
Becker, Edwin D. 2000. High Resolution NMR: Theory and Chemical Applications. 3rd ed. San Diego: Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-084660-9
Field, Leslie D., Sev Sternhell, and John R. Kalman. 2013. Organic Structures from Spectra. 5th ed. Chichester: Wiley. ISBN 978-1-118-32498-1
🧮 DFT vs experiment comparison (IR)
Overlay of the experimental IR spectrum on the theoretically calculated spectrum using the B3LYP/6-31G* method (scaling factor 0.9614, Scott & Radom 1996).
Experimental DFT (theoretical)
Full theoretical data (geometry, frequencies): NIST CCCBDB ↗
📚 Bibliography (Chicago)
Becke, Axel D. 1993. "Density-Functional Thermochemistry. III. The Role of Exact Exchange." Journal of Chemical Physics 98 (7): 5648–5652. Definition of the B3LYP functional.
Scott, Anthony P., and Leo Radom. 1996. "Harmonic Vibrational Frequencies: An Evaluation of Hartree–Fock, Møller–Plesset, Quadratic Configuration Interaction, Density Functional Theory, and Semiempirical Scale Factors." Journal of Physical Chemistry 100 (41): 16502–16513. Scaling factors for DFT (e.g., 0.9614 for B3LYP/6-31G*).
Merrick, Jeffrey P., Damian Moran, and Leo Radom. 2007. "An Evaluation of Harmonic Vibrational Frequency Scale Factors." Journal of Physical Chemistry A 111 (45): 11683–11700. An update to Scott & Radom — scale factors for newer DFT functionals.
Lee, Chengteh, Weitao Yang, and Robert G. Parr. 1988. "Development of the Colle-Salvetti Correlation-Energy Formula into a Functional of the Electron Density." Physical Review B 37 (2): 785–789. The LYP correlation — complements Becke 1993 for B3LYP.
Hehre, Warren J., Robert Ditchfield, and John A. Pople. 1972. "Self-Consistent Molecular Orbital Methods. XII. Further Extensions of Gaussian-Type Basis Sets." Journal of Chemical Physics 56 (5): 2257–2261. Definition of the 6-31G* basis set (split-valence + polarization).
Johnson, Russell D., III, ed. 2022. "NIST Computational Chemistry Comparison and Benchmark Database (CCCBDB)." NIST Standard Reference Database 101, Release 22. https://cccbdb.nist.gov. Benchmark for theoretical values — the fallback link in the widget.
Cramer, Christopher J. 2004. "Essentials of Computational Chemistry: Theories and Models." 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley. A textbook on DFT methods and vibrational frequency calculations.
Jensen, Frank. 2017. "Introduction to Computational Chemistry." 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley. Modern computational chemistry — basis sets and methods for vibrational spectra.
Foresman, James B., and Æleen Frisch. 2015. "Exploring Chemistry with Electronic Structure Methods." 3rd ed. Wallingford, CT: Gaussian, Inc. A practical Gaussian guide — IR + Raman + NMR from DFT.
🎓 Spectrum interpretation guide (for students)
Explanations of every band in the spectrum — why it appears where it does, and what it indicates about the structure.
IR (infrared) (6 peaks)
The IR (infrared) spectrum contains 6 structurally identified bands (out of 9 detected in total: 3 outside recognised ranges). The analysis below explains what each one means structurally and why it appears in that particular range.
C–H stretch (sp3, alkyl)CH3/CH2● high
Band "C–H stretch (sp3, alkyl)" appears in cases: 2,925.7 cm⁻¹ (medium (m)). This is the stretching vibration of aliphatic sp³ C–H bonds. Present in virtually every organic compound with an alkyl chain.
O–H stretch (free, alcohol)OH● high
Band "O–H stretch (free, alcohol)" appears in cases: 3,619.3 cm⁻¹ (weak (w)). Indicates the presence of O–H bonds (alcohol/acid/water). The broad band results from hydrogen bonding in the liquid/solid state.
C–O stretch (alcohol primary, ester)CO● medium
Band "C–O stretch (alcohol primary, ester)" appears in cases: 1,008.6 cm⁻¹ (strong (s)), 1,029.3 cm⁻¹ (strong (s)), 1,050.9 cm⁻¹ (strong (s)). The functional group is identified based on its characteristic range (Pavia/Silverstein) — the precise physical mechanism depends on the nearest chemical neighbors.
C–H bend (CH3 symmetric — gem-dimethyl)gem-CH3● medium
Band "C–H bend (CH3 symmetric — gem-dimethyl)" appears in cases: 1,371.2 cm⁻¹ (weak (w)). The functional group is identified based on its characteristic range (Pavia/Silverstein) — the precise physical mechanism depends on the nearest chemical neighbors.
📚 Bibliography (Chicago)
Field, Leslie D., Sev Sternhell, and John R. Kalman. 2013. "Organic Structures from Spectra." 5th ed. Chichester: Wiley. A student problem-set textbook (interpretation guide companion).
Williams, Dudley H., and Ian Fleming. 2008. "Spectroscopic Methods in Organic Chemistry." 6th ed. London: McGraw-Hill. A classic of narrative spectral interpretation — explains "why the peak is here".
Crews, Phillip, Jaime Rodríguez, and Marcel Jaspars. 2009. "Organic Structure Analysis." 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press. A workflow for multi-parameter structural interpretation.
McLafferty, Fred W., and František Tureček. 1993. "Interpretation of Mass Spectra." 4th ed. Mill Valley, CA: University Science Books. MS fragmentation mechanisms — McLafferty rearrangement, m/z 29 = CHO.
Reusch, William. 2013. "Virtual Textbook of Organic Chemistry: Spectroscopy." East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University. https://www2.chemistry.msu.edu/faculty/reusch/VirtTxtJml/Spectrpy/spectro.htm. An open educational guide to IR/NMR/MS/UV — ideal for explaining functional groups.
Hesse, Manfred, Herbert Meier, and Bernd Zeeh. 2007. "Spektroskopische Methoden in der organischen Chemie." 8th ed. Stuttgart: Thieme. The standard German textbook on spectral interpretation.
Lampman, Gary M., Donald L. Pavia, George S. Kriz, and James R. Vyvyan. 2010. "Spectroscopy." 4th ed. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning. A workbook with integrated interpretive narratives.
Kalsi, P. S. 2010. "Spectroscopy of Organic Compounds." 6th ed. New Delhi: New Age International. A complete textbook on IR/NMR/MS/UV spectral interpretation.
🔎 Spectrum Search (JCAMP-DX)
Upload a JCAMP-DX file (.jdx, .dx, .jcm) — the system will calculate the cosine similarity against all spectra in the database and display the TOP 10 matches.
📚 Bibliography (Chicago)
McLafferty, Fred W., ed. 2018. Wiley Registry of Mass Spectral Data. 11th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. A reference MS library (~775k spectra).
Stein, Stephen E., and Donald R. Scott. 1994. "Optimization and Testing of Mass Spectral Library Search Algorithms for Compound Identification." Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 5 (9): 859–866. The cosine + dot-product algorithm of NIST MS Search.
McDonald, Robert S., and Paul A. Wilks Jr. 1988. "JCAMP-DX: A Standard Form for Exchange of Infrared Spectra in Computer Readable Form." Applied Spectroscopy 42 (1): 151–162. The JCAMP-DX specification (extended to 5.01 for NMR/MS).
McLafferty, Fred W., and František Tureček. 1993. "Interpretation of Mass Spectra." 4th ed. Mill Valley, CA: University Science Books. Cosine-similarity matching and MS fragmentation — the foundation of the search algorithm.
Sumner, Lloyd W., Alexander Amberg, Dave Barrett, Michael H. Beale, Richard Beger, Clare A. Daykin, Teresa W.-M. Fan, et al. 2007. "Proposed Minimum Reporting Standards for Chemical Analysis." Metabolomics 3 (3): 211–221. MSI Level 1-4 — confidence-level standards for spectral matching.
Stein, Stephen E. 1999. "An Integrated Method for Spectrum Extraction and Compound Identification from Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry Data." Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 10 (8): 770–781. The AMDIS algorithm — deconvolution + library match (NIST).
Lindon, John C., George E. Tranter, and David W. Koppenaal, eds. 2017. "Encyclopedia of Spectroscopy and Spectrometry." 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Academic Press. Encyclopedia entries on spectral library searching.
Smith, Brian C. 2011. "Fundamentals of Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy." 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. FT-IR and the JCAMP-DX format for transmission spectra.
Larkin, Peter. 2017. "Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy: Principles and Spectral Interpretation." 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Principles of IR/Raman library matching and peak preprocessing.
Structural properties
Loading structural data...
❓ Frequently asked questions (3)
What is 67-56-1?
67-56-1 (CAS 67-56-1) is a chemical compound. The chemical data comes from PubChem (National Institutes of Health, USA).
Helpful?
What is the CAS number of 67-56-1?
The CAS number for 67-56-1 is 67-56-1. A CAS Registry Number is the standard identifier for a chemical substance in scientific literature and in trade.
Helpful?
How should 67-56-1 be stored?
67-56-1 should be stored as its safety data sheet directs \— typically in a dry, cool, well-ventilated place, away from heat and from materials it is incompatible with.
Helpful?
➕ Suggest a question
Download structure files
Molecular structure files from the PubChem database (NIH). Compatible with Avogadro, PyMOL, Jmol, and ChemDraw.
Cohen ER, Cvitaš T, Frey JG, Holmström B, Kuchitsu K, Marquardt R, Mills I, Pavese F, Quack M, Stohner J, Strauss HL, Takami M, Thor AJ (2007)
g/L ↔ molarity
c (mol/L) = (g/L) / MW
±0.1% (depends on MW precision)
Cohen ER, Cvitaš T, Frey JG, Holmström B, Kuchitsu K, Marquardt R, Mills I, Pavese F, Quack M, Stohner J, Strauss HL, Takami M, Thor AJ (2007)
mmol/L ↔ molarity
c (mol/L) = mmol/L × 10⁻³
Exact
Cohen ER, Cvitaš T, Frey JG, Holmström B, Kuchitsu K, Marquardt R, Mills I, Pavese F, Quack M, Stohner J, Strauss HL, Takami M, Thor AJ (2007)
Celsius ↔ Kelvin
T(K) = t(°C) + 273.15
±0.01 K (ITS-90 scale)
BIPM (Bureau International des Poids et Mesures) (2019)
Celsius ↔ Fahrenheit
T(°F) = T(°C) × 9/5 + 32
±0.1 °F
Thompson A, Taylor BN (2008)
density-corrected % ↔ molarity
c (mol/L) = (%w/w × ρ × 10) / MW, ρ in g/mL
±0.1% when ρ known to 3 decimals
Cohen ER, Cvitaš T, Frey JG, Holmström B, Kuchitsu K, Marquardt R, Mills I, Pavese F, Quack M, Stohner J, Strauss HL, Takami M, Thor AJ (2007)
📚 Bibliography (8 authoritative sources)
Thompson A, Taylor BN (2008). Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI). NIST Special Publication 811 · DOI: 10.6028/NIST.SP.811-2008 → Primary SI standard for US scientific usage
Cohen ER, Cvitaš T, Frey JG, Holmström B, Kuchitsu K, Marquardt R, Mills I, Pavese F, Quack M, Stohner J, Strauss HL, Takami M, Thor AJ (2007). Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry — The IUPAC Green Book. RSC Publishing, 3rd ed. · DOI: 10.1039/9781847557889 · ISBN: 978-0-85404-433-7 → Canonical IUPAC guide for chemistry quantities/units
BIPM (Bureau International des Poids et Mesures) (2019). The International System of Units (SI), 9th edition. BIPM · ↗ → International SI definitions (incl. redefined kilogram 2019)
ISO/IEC (2022). Quantities and units — Part 1: General. International Organization for Standardization — ISO 80000-1:2022 · ↗ → General rules for physical quantities and units
ISO/IEC (2019). Quantities and units — Part 9: Physical chemistry and molecular physics. International Organization for Standardization — ISO 80000-9:2019 · ↗ → Concentration / molality / amount-of-substance conventions
Tiesinga E, Mohr PJ, Newell DB, Taylor BN (2021). CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2018. Rev. Mod. Phys. 93(2):025010 · DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.93.025010 → Avogadro, gas constant, molar volume (2019 SI revision)
IUPAC (2019). Compendium of Chemical Terminology — the IUPAC Gold Book (online). IUPAC · DOI: 10.1351/goldbook → Definitions of mass fraction, molality, normality, ppm, activity
Mills IM, Cvitaš T, Homann K, Kallay N, Kuchitsu K (1988). Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry. Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1st ed. · ISBN: 0-632-01773-5 → Historical predecessor of IUPAC Green Book
Verify reagent purity using standardized analytical methods. Select a test method below and enter your measurement results for automated calculation.
🛡️ Safety — CAS 67-56-1
Data limitations notice. The safety information on this page is for reference only and does not replace a full safety data sheet (SDS). Before using the product, consult the manufacturer's current safety data sheet and the GHS/CLP guidance. The CLP classification applies to the pure bulk substance, not to commercial formulations.
GHS/CLP classification — Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 + UN GHS Rev. 9 (2021).
⚠️ Danger
🔥GHS02Flammable☠GHS06Toxic🫁GHS08Health hazard
🚨 Hazard statements (H)
H225 — Highly flammable liquid and vapour
H331 — Toxic if inhaled
H311 — Toxic in contact with skin
H301 — Toxic if swallowed
H370 — Causes damage to organs
🛡 Precautionary statements (P)
P210 — Keep away from heat, hot surfaces, sparks, open flames and other ignition sources. No smoking
P260 — Do not breathe dust/fume/gas/mist/vapours/spray
P301+P310 — IF SWALLOWED: Immediately call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician
✓ Harmonised classification pursuant to Annex VI of the CLP Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 (official, binding classification). Index number: 603-001-00-X.
Reference (Chicago): European Chemicals Agency. "methanol, Index No. 603-001-00-X." In Table 3 of Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP Regulation), 23rd Adaptation to Technical Progress (harmonised list as of 2026-07-07). Helsinki: European Chemicals Agency, 2026. https://echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals/annex-vi-to-clp.
Translations: CLP Regulation (EC) 1272/2008, Annexes III and IV. Data: PubChem/NLM.
☢️ Toxicological data (IARC + EPA CTX)
🧬 IARC Carcinogen Classification
IARC classification:
No individual IARC entry for this CAS
No separate IARC monograph in the checked lists — this is NOT confirmation of a lack of carcinogenicity. Check the CLP/GHS classification (CMR / GHS section).
🌍 Ecotoxicology & environmental fate (SDS sec. 8/12)
LC₅₀ (fish):
290 mg/L (Danio rerio, 96 h)
EC₅₀ (Daphnia):
22200 mg/L (Daphnia obtusa, 48 h)
EC₅₀ (algae):
16.9 mg/L (Ulva pertusa, 96 h)
ED — aquatic organisms (sec. 12.7):
Testosterone (Carassius auratus) [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2014.06.003]; 17-beta Estradiol (Melanotaenia fluviatilis) [https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.3076]; 17beta-Estradiol:Testosterone ratio (Danio rerio) [https://doi.org/10.1021/es400329t] — source: US EPA ECOTOX (evidence of effect, not a regulatory ED classification).
Source: U.S. EPA ECOTOX Knowledgebase — https://cfpub.epa.gov/ecotox/
The codes below are additional supplier self-classifications (self-classification, ECHA C&L / PubChem notifications) — supplementary to the binding harmonized Annex VI classification above; they may be redundant.
et al.. (2009). "Suicide attempt using pure methanol with hospitalization of the patient soon after ingestion: case report.". https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-31802009000200011 [DOI]
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). 2024. "IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans." Lyon: IARC. 🔗
U.S. EPA. 2024. "ECOTOX Knowledgebase." Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 🔗
ECHA. 2024. "Chemical Safety Assessment." European Chemicals Agency. 🔗
U.S. National Toxicology Program. 2024. Report on Carcinogens. 15th ed. Research Triangle Park, NC: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. 🔗
GESTIS. 2024. "GESTIS Substance Database." Institute for Occupational Safety and Health of the German Social Accident Insurance (DGUV). 🔗
U.S. EPA. 2024. "CompTox Chemicals Dashboard." Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 🔗
ECHA. 2023. "Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP), Annex VI — Harmonised Classification." European Chemicals Agency. 🔗
Leist, Marcel, et al. 2014. "Consensus Report on the Future of Animal-Free Systemic Toxicity Testing." ALTEX 31 (3): 341–356. [DOI]
Hartung, Thomas. 2009. "Toxicology for the Twenty-First Century." Nature 460 (7252): 208–212. [DOI]
Lenga, Robert E., ed. 2008. The Sigma-Aldrich Library of Chemical Safety Data. 2nd ed. Milwaukee: Sigma-Aldrich.
Slikker, William Jr., et al. 2004. "Dose-Dependent Terminal and Tissue Residues After Chronic Exposure." Toxicological Sciences 81 (2): 253–279. [DOI]
Calabrese, Edward J., and Linda A. Baldwin. 2003. "Toxicology Rethinks Its Central Belief." Nature 421 (6924): 691–692. [DOI]
Hodge, Harold C., and J. Harvey Sterner. 1949. "Tabulation of Toxicity Classes." American Industrial Hygiene Association Quarterly 10 (4): 93–96. [DOI]
🆘 First Aid — Emergency ProceduresCAS 67-56-1
Danger
Hazard class: Toxic
⚠️ IMPORTANT:
In case of a serious incident — call 112 or the Poison Control Center (Poland): +48 42 631 47 24 (Łódź).
Methanol: delayed blindness 12–24h. Antidote = fomepizole IV; rapid transport to hospital.
🩹
Skin contact
⏱ Timeline: Systemic 30–60 min
🔴 Symptoms
Mild irritation
Systemic absorption through the skin
✅ What to do
Remove clothing
Flush with soapy water for 15 min
Monitor for systemic symptoms (acidosis, blindness)
❌ What to avoid
Do NOT underestimate — methanol is absorbed through the skin
🚑 Ambulance: Exposure >100 cm² OR systemic symptoms
Goldfrank 2019 §106
👁️
Eye contact
⏱ Timeline: <1 min
🔴 Symptoms
Burning
Tearing
✅ What to do
Rinse for 15 min
OPHTHALMOLOGIST if pain persists
🚑 Ambulance: Pain >30 min
NIOSH 0397
🫁
Inhalation / respiratory tract
⏱ Timeline: Symptoms 30 min — 24h; blindness 12–24h
🔴 Symptoms
Headache
Drowsiness, disorientation
Visual disturbances → blindness (delayed 24h)
✅ What to do
Fresh air
Ambulance — IV fomepizole/ethanol antidote
Hospital hemodialysis
❌ What to avoid
DO NOT underestimate visual disturbances
💊 Antidote: Fomepizole 15 mg/kg IV; ethanol 0.6 g/kg IV if unavailable
🚑 Ambulance: ALWAYS if visual/respiratory disturbance
Brent 2009 NEJM 360:2216
🩺
Ingestion / digestive tract
⏱ Timeline: Symptoms 30 min — 12 h; blindness 12–24 h; death 24–72 h
🔴 Symptoms
Drowsiness, metabolic acidosis
DELAYED blindness 12–24h
Death at >30 mL if untreated
✅ What to do
Do NOT induce vomiting
Poison Control Centre IMMEDIATELY
AMBULANCE — IV fomepizole loading 15 mg/kg + hemodialysis
IV folate 50 mg every 4h (adjunctive)
❌ What to avoid
Do NOT induce vomiting
Do NOT wait for symptoms
Do NOT give ethanol PO without consultation
💊 Antidote: Fomepizole 15 mg/kg IV loading; ethanol 10% in D5W IV 0.6 g/kg
🚑 Ambulance: ALWAYS — ingestion >5 mL
Brent 2009 NEJM; WHO IPCS PIM 335
💊 Antidote (Specific)
Fomepizole 15 mg/kg IV loading; ethanol 10% dextrose loading 0.6 g/kg if fomepizole unavailable
Goldfrank, Lewis R., Robert S. Hoffman, Mary Ann Howland, Neal A. Lewin, Lewis S. Nelson, and Silas W. Smith. 2019. Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies. McGraw-Hill Education.
Olson, Kent R., Ilene B. Anderson, Neal L. Benowitz, Paul D. Blanc, Richard F. Clark, Thomas E. Kearney, Susan Y. Kim-Katz, and Alan H. B. Wu. 2018. Poisoning & Drug Overdose. McGraw-Hill.
World Health Organization (WHO). 2007. Antidotes for Poisoning by Cyanide (IPCS Evaluation Series 21). International Programme on Chemical Safety, WHO Press. ↗
Howland, Mary Ann, and Robert S. Aaron. 2002. Goldfrank's Antidotes for Pediatric Emergency Care. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Centrum Zatruć Łódź. 2024. Procedury kliniczne w zatruciach ostrych — wytyczne dla ratowników. Centrum Informacji Toksykologicznej. ↗
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 2007. Recommendations for First Aid Procedures for Chemical Exposures (NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards, DHHS Publication No. 2005-149). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. ↗
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). 2021. Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS), Revision 9. United Nations. ↗
Brent, Jeffrey. 2009. Fomepizole for the Treatment of Pediatric Ethylene and Diethylene Glycol, Butoxyethanol, and Methanol Poisonings. Clinical Toxicology 48(5): 401–406.
European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN). 2018. Caustic Ingestion in Children — Position Paper. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 66(5): 838–845.
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). 2024. Toxicological Profiles — Medical Management Guidelines. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. ↗
IPCS INCHEM. 2024. International Programme on Chemical Safety — Poisons Information Monographs. WHO/UNEP/ILO. ↗
American National Standards Institute (ANSI). 2014. ANSI Z358.1-2014 — Emergency Eyewash and Shower Equipment. International Safety Equipment Association.
🚨 Emergency procedure — chemical spillFlammable
CAS 67-56-1GHS:H225H331H311H301H370⚠️ EVACUATION (10m)💨 Ventilation
⚠️ GENERIC procedure derived from the GHS classification (no curated data for this CAS). Always follow the supplier's current Safety Data Sheet (SDS).
1. Remove ignition sources; no sparking or open flames.
2. Ventilate to disperse vapors; use grounded, spark-proof tools.
3. Cover with a non-combustible absorbent; collect into a vented / UN container.
4. Wash the area with water; treat residues and absorbent as hazardous waste.
Additional properties from GHS:
• toxic — respiratory protection, avoid contact
• health hazard (CMR / STOT / aspiration) — minimize exposure
🛢️ Large spill (>1L) ⚠️ Hazardous material
1. Evacuate; eliminate all ignition sources, monitor vapor concentration (LEL).
2. Full antistatic PPE; spark-proof equipment. Extinguishing: foam/powder/CO2 — NOT a water jet.
3. Collect mechanically into a labeled UN container; hand over to an authorized company (BDO — national rule, Poland).
4. Report the incident per the OHS procedure; on release to the environment notify the Regional Environmental Inspectorate (WIOŚ) (national rule — Poland).
🩹 First aid
🧴 Skin
1. Remove contaminated clothing.
2. Rinse the skin with plenty of water for ≥15 min.
3. The substance may be absorbed through the skin — monitor symptoms / see a doctor.
👁️ Eyes
1. Rinse with water for ≥15 min, eyelids held open; remove contact lenses.
2. See an ophthalmologist if irritation persists.
🫁 Inhalation
1. Move the casualty to fresh air, comfortable position.
2. If short of breath — oxygen / doctor.
🍽️ Ingestion
1. Rinse the mouth with water; do NOT induce vomiting.
2. Poison Control Center (Poland): +48 42 631 47 24.
🌍 Environment:
Water: Medium; Soil: Low; ❌ Do not release into drains; Waste Code: 16 05 06*
📚 Scientific references (Chicago Author-Date) — 8
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). 2020. Guidance on the Compilation of Safety Data Sheets — Section 6: Accidental Release Measures. ECHA.
[link ↗]
European Parliament and Council. 2008. Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP) — Hazard classes and H-statements. Official Journal of the European Union L 353.
[link ↗]
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 2023. Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards — NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. CDC.
[link ↗]
U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. 2024. 29 CFR 1910.120 — Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response (HAZWOPER). U.S. Code of Federal Regulations.
[link ↗]
National Fire Protection Association. 2018. NFPA 472: Standard for Competence of Responders to Hazardous Materials/Weapons of Mass Destruction Incidents. NFPA.
[link ↗]
European Parliament and Council. 2012. Directive 2012/18/EU on the Control of Major-Accident Hazards Involving Dangerous Substances (Seveso III). Official Journal of the European Union L 197: 1–37.
[link ↗]
U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. 2024. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[link ↗]
European Chemicals Agency. 2020. Guidance on the Compilation of Safety Data Sheets (SDS), Version 3.1. ECHA.
[link ↗]
Sources: GHS/CLP classification (PubChem/SDS) — generic fallback · ECHA Guidance on SDS (section 6) · NIOSH Pocket Guide.
Indicative data only — in an emergency, always follow the supplier's instructions and local occupational health and safety (OHS) regulations.
☠️ Visual PPE guide (personal protective equipment)Toxic
🧤 Gloves
Double nitrile (double-glove) >0.2 mm (each layer) EN 374-1 typ B
Replace every 30 min or immediately after contact
👁️ Safety Glasses / Goggles
EN 166 B
Full side protection; sealed goggles for toxic dusts
🥼 Lab Coat / Coverall
Full buttoned lab coat + disposable sleeves EN 13688
Airborne concentration < OEL (NDS) per Dz.U. 2024 item 1017
😷 Respirator Required
P2 half-mask (fine aerosols) or P3 (>10× OEL); full-face mask with A1B1E1K1-P3 filter for toxic organic vapors
📚 Scientific references (Chicago Author-Date)
European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2016. EN 374-1:2016 — Protective gloves against dangerous chemicals and micro-organisms — Part 1: Terminology and performance requirements for chemical risks. CEN, Brussels. EN 374-1:2016. [link ↗] — Classification of chemical-resistant gloves type A/B/C; JKLPT permeation tests
European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2001. EN 166:2001 — Personal eye-protection — Specifications. CEN, Brussels. EN 166:2001. [link ↗] — Markings: B = medium-energy impact, T = extreme temperatures, 9 = molten metals and hot solids
European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2009. EN 14605:2005+A1:2009 — Protective clothing against liquid chemicals — Performance requirements for clothing with liquid-tight (Type 3) or spray-tight (Type 4) connections. CEN, Brussels. EN 14605:2009. [link ↗] — Type 3 (jet-tight) and Type 4 (spray-tight) protection against liquid chemicals
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 2017. Recommendations for Chemical Protective Clothing: A Companion to the NIOSH Pocket Guide. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services / CDC. [link ↗] — Practical guide to CPC (chemical protective clothing) selection per substance and exposure scenario
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). 2011. Personal Protective Equipment — General requirements. U.S. Department of Labor — 29 CFR 1910.132. 29 CFR 1910.132. [link ↗] — The employer must provide PPE + training + a documented written hazard assessment
ℹ️ Regulatory obligations checklist for CAS 67-56-1.
Status based on: ADR 2025 (Table A), REACH Annex XVII, CLP Annex VI (harmonised classification), hazard class from the m14-spill DB, SVHC, GIS and the Polish OEL list. Principle: no data = no claim (we do NOT declare "no restrictions" without a basis).
✅SDS (Safety Data Sheet) availablefulfilled
How to comply: Requirement: current SDS compliant with Reg. 1907/2006 (REACH) Annex II, 16-section format.
Legal basis: Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) Art. 31 + Annex II
▣Compliant CLP label (pictograms + signal word + H/P)required
How to comply: The label must include: GHS pictograms, the signal word (Danger/Warning), hazard (H) and precautionary (P) statements, and manufacturer details. Required since 2010 (substances) and 2015 (mixtures). For this substance a HARMONISED CLASSIFICATION applies (CLP Annex VI) — see below; it takes precedence over self-classification.
Legal basis: Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP) Art. 17-33 + Annex VI (harmonised classification)
How to comply: Road transport compliant with ADR 2025: Class 3, UN 1230, PG II. Required: DGSA safety adviser certificate, class + UN labels, transport documents, packaging compliant with Chapter 6.
Legal basis: ADR 2025 European Agreement + Polish Act of 19 August 2011 on the Transport of Dangerous Goods National rules — Poland
🔵REACH registration (>1 t/year EU import)conditional
How to comply: Importers/manufacturers ≥1 tonne/year must register the substance with ECHA (technical dossier + Chemical Safety Report if ≥10 t). Check the ECHA Annex VI / registered substances list.
Legal basis: Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) Art. 5-22
❓SVHC notification (Substances of Very High Concern)to be verified
How to comply: In the MOL-GOD dataset flagged as a POSSIBLE SVHC candidate, but the entry is UNVERIFIED against the full ECHA candidate list — confirm in the ECHA Candidate List BEFORE any declaration (REACH art. 59).
▣REACH Annex XVII (use/marketing restrictions)required
How to comply: Substance subject to a REACH Annex XVII restriction (entry 69): Methanol — restriction on placing on the market for the general public in windscreen washer fluids and defrosters at a concentration >= 0.6% by weight. Check the conditions for placing on the market/use and the note in SDS section 15.
Legal basis: Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) Annex XVII — restrictions on manufacture, placing on the market and use
⚠️ REACH Annex XVII (entry 69): Methanol — restriction on placing on the market for the general public in windscreen washer fluids and defrosters at a concentration >= 0.6% by weight.
European Parliament and Council. 2008. Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (CLP). Official Journal of the European Union L 353/1. CLP Regulation 1272/2008. [link ↗] — Classification, labelling and packaging of substances + mixtures (GHS implementation in the EU)
European Parliament and Council. 2006. Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH). Official Journal of the European Union L 396/1. REACH Regulation 1907/2006. [link ↗] — REACH — registration, evaluation and authorisation of chemicals; SVHC; SDS Annex II
Ministerstwo Rodziny i Polityki Społecznej Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. 2024. Rozporządzenie Ministra Rodziny i Polityki Społecznej z dnia 4 września 2024 r. w sprawie najwyższych dopuszczalnych stężeń i natężeń czynników szkodliwych dla zdrowia w środowisku pracy. Dziennik Ustaw RP 2024 poz. 1017. National rules — Poland[link ↗] — NDS and NDSCh for ~600 chemical substances — current Polish occupational exposure limits
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). 2025. European Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR), 2025 Edition. United Nations, Geneva. ADR 2025. [link ↗] — International agreement on the road transport of dangerous goods — UN numbers, classes, packaging
📚 Consolidated scientific references — Chicago Author-Date 10 sources
References collected from all Safety Hub tabs. CAS: 67-56-1 ·
PubChem ↗
Parlament Europejski i Rada UE. 2008. "Regulation (EC) nr 1272/2008 w sprawie klasyfikacji, oznakowania i pakowania substancji (CLP)." Dz.Urz. UE L 353. [↗]
GHS, Regulations
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). 2021. "Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS), Ninth Revised Edition." United Nations, Geneva. [↗]
GHS
Goldfrank, Lewis R., Robert S. Hoffman, Mary Ann Howland, et al.. 2019. "Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies, 11th ed.." McGraw-Hill Education, New York. ISBN 978-1-25-985961-8.
First aid, Toxicology
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 2023. "NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards (DHHS Publ. 2005-149)." U.S. Department of Health and Human Services / CDC, Cincinnati, OH. [↗]
First aid, PPE, Toxicology
European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2016. "EN 374-1:2016 — Protective gloves against dangerous chemicals and micro-organisms." CEN, Brussels. [↗]
PPE
UNECE. 2023. "European Agreement Concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR 2025)." United Nations, Geneva. [↗]
Disposal, Regulations
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). 2022. "NFPA 400 — Hazardous Materials Code." NFPA, Quincy, MA. [↗]
Storage
Urben, P.G. (ed.). 2017. "Bretherick's Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards, 8th ed.." Butterworth-Heinemann / Elsevier, Oxford. [↗]
Storage
Ministerstwo Klimatu i Środowiska RP. 2023. "Baza danych o produktach i opakowaniach oraz o gospodarce odpadami (BDO)." Ministerstwo Klimatu i Środowiska, Warszawa. National rules — Poland[↗]
Disposal
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC / WHO). 2024. "IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans — List of Classifications." WHO, Lyon. [↗]
Toxicology
Tabs with their own references (Emergency, PPE, Storage, Waste) contain additional bibliographic entries within their respective sections.
Paste a series of replicate measurements (CSV, or one number per line). The calculator computes the mean, standard deviation and 95% CI, and detects outliers (Grubbs + Dixon Q).
Separator: comma, space, tab, new line. Minimum 3 measurements.
📐 Statistical formulas
x̄ = Σxᵢ / n — arithmetic mean
s² = Σ(xᵢ - x̄)² / (n-1) — sample variance
s = √s² — standard deviation
RSD% = (s / x̄) × 100% — relative standard deviation
Plan your entire laboratory project: add experiments with reagents, replicates, and duration. You'll get a Gantt chart, a shopping list (with links to the store!), a budget with a 10% margin, and a GHS risk matrix.
💡 Log in to save projects.
Without logging in you can calculate but not save.
🧪 Solubility and solvent compatibility
Molecule
Methanol
Formula
CH4O
logP (XLogP3)
-0.50
Mass (g/mol)
32.04
Polarity
Hydrophilic (polar)
⚠️ HSP estimate (literature / group contribution). Indicative data — does not replace experimental studies.
Solvent
Compat.
Ra
Visual
GC-MS
HPLC
Applications
References
Ra < R₀ = good miscibility · Ra < 1,5×R₀ = borderline · above = poor (R₀ — radius of the Hansen sphere of this molecule) For this molecule R₀ = 7..
Solubility theory (applied in compatibility prediction):
Yalkowsky, Samuel H., and Shri C. Valvani. 1980. "Solubility and Partitioning I: Solubility of Nonelectrolytes in Water." Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 69 (8): 912–922. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600690814 — General Solubility Equation (GSE): logS = 0.5 − logP − 0.01(MP−25).
Hansen, Charles M. 2007. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook. 2nd ed. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420006834 — HSP triplet (dD, dP, dH) + Ra formula.
Stefanis, E., and C. Panayiotou. 2008. "Prediction of Hansen Solubility Parameters with a New Group-Contribution Method." Int J Thermophys 29: 568–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-008-0415-z
Reichardt, Christian, and Thomas Welton. 2011. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry. 4th ed. Wiley-VCH. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527632220 — E_T(30) polarity scale, solvatochromism.
Snyder, Lloyd R., Joseph J. Kirkland, and John W. Dolan. 2010. Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470508183 — Eluotropic series, polarity index.
Van Krevelen, D. W., and K. Te Nijenhuis. 2009. Properties of Polymers. 4th ed. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-054819-7.X0001-5 — Hoftyzer–Van Krevelen group contribution for dD/dP/dH from SMILES.
Marcus, Yizhak. 1998. The Properties of Solvents. Wiley Series in Solution Chemistry, Vol. 4. ISBN 9780471983699 — Complete tabular set of 250+ solvents (ε, μ, donicity, acceptor numbers).
PubChem Compound Database — CAS 67-56-1 lookup ↗ — logP (XLogP3), water solubility experimental + predicted.
Full bibliography in the REFERENCES accordion (at the bottom of the page) — Chicago Manual of Style 17th ed., Author-Date.
🧮 Solubility calculator
Solubility:—
logS:—
Method:—
⚠️ —
Solubility vs temperature
🌐 Hansen Solubility Sphere (3D)
The closer to the molecule (red sphere), the better the solvent. · Advanced: labels + grid + axes + pulsation.
Your molecule
Good (Ra < R₀)
Borderline (Ra < 1.5×R₀)
Poor (Ra ≥ 1.5×R₀)
Ra < R₀ = good miscibility · Ra < 1,5×R₀ = borderline · above = poor (R₀ — radius of the Hansen sphere of this molecule) For this molecule R₀ = 7..
📚 Data sources: HSP + Ra
et al.. (2009). "Suicide attempt using pure methanol with hospitalization of the patient soon after ingestion: case report.". https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-31802009000200011 [DOI ↗]
Van Krevelen, D. W., and K. Te Nijenhuis. 2009. Properties of Polymers: Their Correlation with Chemical Structure; Their Numerical Estimation and Prediction from Additive Group Contributions. 4th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier. [DOI ↗]
Stefanis, Eirini, and Costas Panayiotou. 2008. "Prediction of Hansen Solubility Parameters with a New Group-Contribution Method." International Journal of Thermophysics 29 (2): 568–585. [DOI ↗]
Hansen, Charles M. 2007. Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press. [DOI ↗]
Martin, Andre, Joel Newburger, and Alan Adjei. 1993. "Extended Hildebrand Solubility Approach: Solubility of Caffeine in Dioxane–Water Mixtures." Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 82 (3): 248–252. [DOI ↗]
Barton, Allan F. M. 1991. CRC Handbook of Solubility Parameters and Other Cohesion Parameters. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press. ↗
Fedors, R. F. 1974. "A Method for Estimating Both the Solubility Parameters and Molar Volumes of Liquids." Polymer Engineering and Science 14 (2): 147–154. [DOI ↗]
Method: Group Contribution (GC) — rapid δD/δP/δH estimation from logP when experimental data are unavailable. Accuracy ±2 MPa^½. For higher precision → HSPiP software.
Ra < R₀ = good miscibility · Ra < 1,5×R₀ = borderline · above = poor (R₀ — radius of the Hansen sphere of this molecule) Target molecule: δD=15.1,
δP=12.3,
δH=22.37
📊 Automatically extracted topics from the abstracts of 2 publications for CAS 67-56-1.
Algorithm: TF-IDF (Salton & Buckley 1988) — term frequency × inverse document frequency.
suicide 2
hospitalization 2
ingestion 2
case 2
suicide attempt 1
attempt pure 1
pure hospitalization 1
hospitalization patient 1
patient soon 1
soon ingestion 1
🔍 Ranking details (TF-IDF)
Tag
TF
DF
IDF
Score
suicide
2
1
1.405
2.811
hospitalization
2
1
1.405
2.811
ingestion
2
1
1.405
2.811
case
2
1
1.405
2.811
suicide attempt
1
1
1.405
1.968
attempt pure
1
1
1.405
1.968
pure hospitalization
1
1
1.405
1.968
hospitalization patient
1
1
1.405
1.968
patient soon
1
1
1.405
1.968
soon ingestion
1
1
1.405
1.968
🔗 Citation network2 seed papers
📊 Citation graph for CAS 67-56-1.
Each node = a research paper; an A→B edge = paper A cites B. Data from OpenAlex (Priem 2022).
⚡ Fetch network data
Network built on-demand from the OpenAlex API (24h cache).
⚠
This substance is subject to special requirements
Storage: Annex XVII entry 69: ≤0.6% in windscreen-washer/defroster fluids supplied to general public.
CAS, EC and molecular formula, resolved across the identifier systems a buyer uses. The count of systems resolved is shown, so you can see how well characterised this substance is rather than assuming.
Data
Every physicochemical value carries the source it came from and the date that source was read. Open any of them.
Classification
Read against the harmonised entry where one exists, with the index number stated. Self-classification is shown separately and labelled.
Regulatory
Inventory, restriction, authorisation and candidate-list status, each stated individually. Where a status is not established, this page says so — it never says no restrictions apply.
Documentation
Which documents exist, at what review level, in which languages, and when each was issued.
Supplier
Who is selling this, and what they have published about themselves.
Nothing on this page is a certification. It is a record you can audit.
Two guarantees, both with their limits stated
The Gap Report Guarantee
If the available evidence cannot support a defensible document for your CAS number and product specification, we will not invent the missing values. You receive a documented gap report and choose: a refund, store credit, or the report on its own.
A visible gap is worth more than a plausible number, because the plausible number is the one that fails when somebody checks it.
The Re-issue Promise
If a signed card is rejected by an authority or by a customer’s compliance officer on one of the points we checked and reported as passed, we re-issue it corrected at no charge and credit the original fee.
This covers the checks we performed and named. It does not cover registration status, tonnage, or your role in the supply chain — those are not ours to hold, and a guarantee that pretended otherwise would be worth nothing.
methanol — CAS 67-56-1, Annex VI index 603-001-00-X. Below: what the regulatory file for this substance must contain and where such files usually fail.
methanol (CAS 67-56-1) at a glance
Substance – methanol
CAS number – 67-56-1
EC number – 200-659-6
CLP Annex VI index number – 603-001-00-X
Hazard statements – H225 (highly flammable liquid and vapour); H331 (toxic if inhaled); H311 (toxic in contact with skin); H301 (toxic if swallowed); H370 (causes damage to organs)
Concentration limits / M-factor / ATE – *;STOT SE 1;H370: C ≥ 10.0%;STOT SE 2;H371: 3.0% ≤ C < 10.0%
Entry current as of – CLP00
CMR classification – not classified as CMR in the harmonised entry
Documentation issued – safety data sheet in REACH Annex II structure; working draft or signed card
What is supplied – a document. MolGod.org does not sell, supply or ship chemical substances.
What concentration limits apply to methanol?
The harmonised entry for methanol carries specific concentration limits: H370: C≥10 %; H371: 3 % ≤ C<10 %. These override the generic cut-off values, so a mixture containing methanol is classified against these figures and not against the default thresholds.
Is methanol on the SVHC candidate list?
Outside the Union the same substance appears on AICS (AU), NDSL (CA), TSCA (US). Exporters are read against the list of the destination, not of the origin.
What is the UN number for methanol?
For carriage, methanol is assigned UN 1230, transport class 3, packing group II, with subsidiary risk 6.1. These entries belong in section 14 of the safety data sheet and must match the shipping papers exactly. A consignment where the sheet and the transport document disagree on the UN number is stopped before anyone reads the remaining fifteen sections.
What Annex VI notes and concentration limits apply to methanol?
The register also records *;STOT SE 1;H370: C ≥ 10.0%;STOT SE 2;H371: 3.0% ≤ C < 10.0% for this entry. Specific concentration limits, M-factors and acute toxicity estimates override the generic cut-off values, so a mixture calculation that ignores them will classify the mixture wrongly in both directions.
Protective equipment and exposure controls
Laboratories building a risk assessment for methanol start from section 8. Where an occupational exposure limit exists it must be stated with its source and averaging period; where none exists, the sheet says so rather than leaving the field blank.
Is methanol a controlled substance?
Storage requirement on record: Annex XVII entry 69: ≤0.6% in windscreen-washer/defroster fluids supplied to general public. None of this appears in the CLP classification, so a sheet built from Annex VI alone will be silent on it.
Which GHS pictograms apply to methanol?
The label for methanol carries GHS02 (flame), GHS06 (skull and crossbones), GHS08 (health hazard), with the signal word Danger. These are not chosen by the supplier: CLP Annex VI states them for CAS 67-56-1, and the precedence rules in Annex I decide which pictogram is dropped when two would say the same thing. A label showing a different set from the register is wrong even if every hazard statement on it is correct.
What must the label for methanol contain?
The supply label for methanol is generated from the same classification that drives the safety data sheet: pictograms selected by precedence, one signal word derived from the highest hazard class present, and the hazard statements H225, H331, H311… reproduced in full. Where the container is too small to carry the complete set at a legible size, there are lawful ways to handle it and unlawful ones that look identical to a non-specialist.
Disposal route and waste classification
Section 13 for CAS 67-56-1 outlines the disposal method and procedures for contaminated packaging. Laboratories are subject to audits to ensure their waste management practices align with the information provided in this section. Any ambiguity or lack of specificity in this section may result in findings against the laboratory rather than the supplier, as it is responsible for adhering to the declared waste stream.
What is the EC number for methanol?
Alongside CAS 67-56-1, this substance carries EC number 200-659-6 and Annex VI index 603-001-00-X. European documentation is built around the EC number as often as around the CAS: registration dossiers, the candidate list and customs systems key on it. A safety data sheet quoting only one of the two forces every downstream reader to look up the other.
What is the CLP classification of methanol?
The harmonised classification for CAS 67-56-1 carries 5 hazard statements: H225, H331, H311, H301, H370. In plain terms this means highly flammable liquid and vapour; toxic if inhaled; toxic in contact with skin; toxic if swallowed. A harmonised entry is binding across the Union — an importer may not soften it, and a self-classification that diverges from it will not survive an enforcement check.
Published sources behind the data
The toxicological and physicochemical record for methanol rests on published literature, not on a supplier summary. One of the canonical references is BASF / Mittasch, A.; Pier, M. (1923), “Synthesis of methanol from CO and H2 (BASF high-pressure process patent)”, German Patent DE 415686. Where a value in the sheet comes from a specific paper, the sheet says which paper — a reviewer can then check one number without re-reading the whole document.
How is methanol classified for road, sea and air transport?
Carriers and forwarders handling methanol compare section 14 against the shipping papers before loading. Any disagreement stops the consignment at the point where correcting it is most expensive.
Identifiers that must agree
Three identifiers travel with this substance and all three have to agree: CAS 67-56-1, the Annex VI index number 603-001-00-X, and the name as it appears in the register. Mismatched identifiers are the quietest defect in a documentation set, because every individual document looks correct and only a cross-check reveals that they describe different things.
Is methanol restricted under REACH Annex XVII?
Methanol is covered by entry 69 of Annex XVII to REACH, which restricts how it may be placed on the market or used. A restriction is not the same as a classification: it limits the permitted uses regardless of how the substance is labelled, and it belongs in section 15 of the sheet. Importers who read only the classification and stop there routinely miss this.
Questions about documentation for methanol
What hazard statements apply to CAS 67-56-1?
The harmonised entry lists H225, H331, H311, H301. These are binding across the Union and may not be softened by a self-classification.
In which language must the sheet be supplied?
In an official language of each Member State where methanol is placed on the market, unless that State has stated otherwise.
Can I check whether my existing sheet is still valid?
Yes. A section-by-section reading against Annex II and the current harmonised entry establishes that in one pass, and a sheet that passes is reported as passing.
Do I need a safety data sheet to import methanol into the EU?
Yes. A sheet compiled to Annex II of REACH must exist before the first consignment moves, and it must be held by the entity placing the substance on the Union market.
MolGod.org issues documentation and does not sell, supply or ship chemical substances. CAS 67-56-1 identifies the subject of this document.
Which version do you need?
📄
SDS Working Draft
€49.99
Delivered automatically after payment, by e-mail
Full 16-section REACH Annex II structure
Classification against ECHA CLP Annex VI
Public-source data with references
Unresolved gaps flagged, never filled by guesswork
For internal drafting and supplier review. Unsigned; supplier-specific fields may need completing.
Best for
Seeing what the document will contain before you commit
Comparing what a supplier sent you against the register
Finding the gaps in a sheet you already hold
Preparing an internal file before an export decision
Substances you handle but do not yet sell
Recommended when the document leaves your company✍
Expert-Reviewed SDS
€249.99
Everything in the Working Draft
Reviewed by a competent person under Annex II, section by section
Adapted to your company, product grade and identified use
Destination market and language checked
Transport section reviewed for the mode you request
Five rounds of corrections applied to your instructions
Within 72 hours of receiving complete input.
Best for
Any document that leaves your company
A customer or distributor who asked for the sheet
Paperwork travelling with an export shipment
A sheet an inspector or authority may read
Replacing a sheet a customer has already rejected
If you are unsure, read down the left column and stop at the first line that describes your situation.
What the document is for
Working Draft €49.99
Expert-Reviewed €249.99
Internal drafting and review
Yes
Yes
Checking a sheet a supplier sent you
Yes
Yes
Sent to your customer
Not written for this
Yes
Travels with an export shipment
Not written for this
Yes
Read by an inspector or authority
Not written for this
Yes
Adapted to your company, grade and identified use
No
Yes
Signed and dated by the reviewer
No
Yes
When you get it
Immediately after payment
Within 72 hours of complete input
Nothing stops you sending a draft to anyone. "Not written for this" means exactly that: it carries no signature and no fields adapted to your company, so it will not answer the questions the recipient is about to ask.
What the signature means
Who prepares the document
The document is generated by the MolGod engine from ECHA CLP Annex VI and the cited public sources, then read section by section by a qualified scientific reviewer with a degree in chemistry or a related scientific field.
What the review covers
The sheet is read section by section against the REACH Annex II structure. GHS classification and transport entries are checked against the sources cited in the document, and the sheet is adapted to the company, product grade and identified use you provide.
What is NOT verified
We do not test your material and we cannot confirm what is physically in your container: composition, concentration, impurities or manufacturing route. Those come from you and are reproduced as supplied.
What the signature is — and is not
The signature records that a qualified scientific reviewer read the document. It is not a government approval, not an ECHA approval, and not a legal certification — no such certification exists for safety data sheets in the EU. A signature does not by itself make a document legally valid or make your business compliant.
What you receive
A PDF in the 16-section REACH Annex II structure, signed and dated, with version information and a list of anything we could not establish. Five rounds of corrections are included.
Delivery
Within 72 hours of receiving complete input from you. The clock pauses whenever we are waiting on an answer.
Refunds
Full refund before review begins. If the evidence is insufficient, you choose a refund, store credit or a gap report. See the refund policy.
No fabricated-data guarantee.
If the available evidence is insufficient to support a defensible document for this CAS number and your product specification, we will not invent the missing values. You may choose a refund, store credit or a documented gap report.
The supplier placing the substance or mixture on the market remains responsible for ensuring that the final safety data sheet matches the material, its identified uses and their legal role in the supply chain.
📚 Scientific references (Chicago Author-Date) — click to expand
Batch management and laboratory certification standards — 13 independent sources (ICH Q1/Q3/Q6/Q7/Q10 + ISO 17025 + WHO TRS + 21 CFR 211 + EMA + USP + Ph.Eur. + PIC/S + IPEC-PQG).
International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). 2000. "Q7 Good Manufacturing Practice Guide for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients." ICH Expert Working Group. [link ↗] — GMP for APIs — adopted by EMA, FDA, MHLW
International Organization for Standardization. 2017. "ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories." ISO. [link ↗] — Lab accreditation standard underpinning every CoA
World Health Organization. 2010. "WHO Good Manufacturing Practices for Pharmaceutical Products: Main Principles (WHO Technical Report Series No. 957, Annex 3)." WHO Press. [link ↗] — WHO TRS No. 957 — global reference for GMP
International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). 2003. "ICH Q1A(R2): Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products." International Council for Harmonisation. [link ↗] — Source for batch shelf-life and retest dating
International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). 2006. "ICH Q3A(R2): Impurities in New Drug Substances." ICH. [link ↗]
International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). 1999. "ICH Q6A: Specifications for New Drug Substances and Products." ICH. [link ↗] — CoA acceptance-criteria specification standard
International Council for Harmonisation (ICH). 2008. "ICH Q10: Pharmaceutical Quality System." ICH. [link ↗]
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 2024. "21 CFR Part 211: Current Good Manufacturing Practice for Finished Pharmaceuticals." US Code of Federal Regulations. [link ↗] — US legal mandate (Subpart J — Records and Reports)
European Medicines Agency. 2014. "Guideline on Process Validation for Finished Products — Information and Data to Be Provided EMA/CHMP/CVMP/QWP/BWP/70278/2012." European Medicines Agency. [link ↗]
United States Pharmacopeial Convention. 2024. "United States Pharmacopeia and National Formulary, USP 47-NF 42." USP. [link ↗]
European Pharmacopoeia Commission. 2024. "European Pharmacopoeia 11th Edition." Council of Europe — EDQM. [link ↗]
Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme (PIC/S). 2021. "Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products PE 009-15." PIC/S Secretariat, Geneva. [link ↗] — Cross-recognized GMP for 54 inspectorates worldwide
International Pharmaceutical Excipients Council (IPEC) and Pharmaceutical Quality Group (PQG). 2017. "Joint IPEC-PQG Good Manufacturing Practices Guide for Pharmaceutical Excipients." IPEC-Americas. [link ↗] — Excipient-grade CoA standard for non-API ingredients
Model: Gaussian curve centered at λmax, scaled with the Beer-Lambert law A = ε · c · l. Transmittance T = 10^(-A) · 100%.
📚 Scientific references (Chicago Author-Date)
et al.. (2009). "Suicide attempt using pure methanol with hospitalization of the patient soon after ingestion: case report.". https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-31802009000200011 [DOI]
Linstrom, Peter J., and William G. Mallard, eds. 2023. NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. [DOI]
Mayerhöfer, Thomas G., Samir Pahlow, and Jürgen Popp. 2020. "The Bouguer-Beer-Lambert Law: Shining Light on the Obscure." ChemPhysChem 21 (18): 2029-2046. [DOI]
Skoog, Douglas A., F. James Holler, and Stanley R. Crouch. 2017. Principles of Instrumental Analysis. 7th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning. ISBN 978-1-305-57721-3.
Lindon, John C., George E. Tranter, and David W. Koppenaal, eds. 2017. "Encyclopedia of Spectroscopy and Spectrometry." 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-803224-4.
Field, Leslie D., Sev Sternhell, and John R. Kalman. 2013. "Organic Structures from Spectra." 5th ed. Chichester: Wiley. ISBN 978-1-119-96582-6.
Reusch, William. 2013. "Virtual Textbook of Organic Chemistry: Spectroscopy." East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
Lampman, Gary M., Donald L. Pavia, George S. Kriz, and James R. Vyvyan. 2010. "Spectroscopy." 4th ed. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning. ISBN 978-0-495-88992-9.
Kalsi, P. S. 2010. "Spectroscopy of Organic Compounds." 6th ed. New Delhi: New Age International. ISBN 978-81-224-2032-9.
Williams, Dudley H., and Ian Fleming. 2008. "Spectroscopic Methods in Organic Chemistry." 6th ed. London: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-711559-0.
Sadek, Paul C. 2002. The HPLC Solvent Guide. 2nd ed. Hoboken: Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-41242-2.
Banwell, Colin N., and Elaine M. McCash. 1994. "Fundamentals of Molecular Spectroscopy." 4th ed. London: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-707976-1.
Perkampus, Heinz-Helmut. 1992. UV-VIS Spectroscopy and Its Applications. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77479-9.
Fieser, Louis F. 1949. "Extension of Woodward's Rules for Prediction of Conjugated Diene Absorption." Journal of the American Chemical Society 71 (5): 1854-1857. [DOI]
Woodward, Robert B. 1942. "Structure and the Absorption Spectra of Alpha,Beta-Unsaturated Ketones." Journal of the American Chemical Society 64 (1): 72-75. [DOI]
Beer, August. 1852. "Bestimmung der Absorption des rothen Lichts in farbigen Flüssigkeiten." Annalen der Physik und Chemie 86: 78-88. https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.18521620505.
Lambert, Johann Heinrich. 1760. Photometria. Augsburg: Sumptibus Vidae.
📖 The λmax = 205 nm value comes from a database or the literature. No independent cross-check (NIST / CrossRef / PubChem) — cross-verification unavailable.
Source: RTECS PC1400000; U.S. EPA IRIS Methanol 2013 (2013). CAS 67-56-1.
LD50/LC50 data are for guidance only; they do not replace the safety data sheet (SDS) or expert toxicological assessment. GHS classification for the oral route (mg/kg bw) per UN GHS, 10th rev. 2023, Annex 1 §3.1.1.
Bibliography (Chicago)
NIOSH. Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances (RTECS). Cincinnati: NIOSH.
U.S. EPA. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
United Nations. 2023. "Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS)." 10th rev. ed. New York: UN.
Hodge, Harold C., and James H. Sterner. 1949. "Tabulation of toxicity classes." American Industrial Hygiene Association Quarterly 10 (4): 93-96.
Further sources (methodology, not cited directly):
U.S. EPA. 2024. "ChemView." https://chemview.epa.gov/.
Lipnick, Robert L., et al. 1995. "Comparison of the up-and-down, conventional LD50, and fixed-dose acute toxicity procedures." Food and Chemical Toxicology 33 (3): 223-231.
ATSDR. 2024. "Toxicological Profiles." Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/.
Hayes, Wallace, and Claire L. Kruger, eds. 2014. "Hayes' Principles and Methods of Toxicology." 6th ed. CRC Press.
Lewis, Richard J. 2012. "Sax's Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials." 12th ed. Wiley.
IARC. 2024. "Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans." International Agency for Research on Cancer (classification criteria for carcinogenicity: IARC Group 1/2A/2B).
Pohanish, Richard P. 2017. "Sittig's Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and Carcinogens." 7th ed. Elsevier.
Bingham, Eula, Barbara Cohrssen, and Charles H. Powell, eds. 2012. "Patty's Toxicology." 6th ed. Wiley.
WHO. 2023. "Recommended Classification of Pesticides by Hazard." World Health Organization (zgodne z UN GHS Annex 1 §3.1.1).
⚠️ Drug interactions (1)
Known pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions for CAS 67-56-1 according to consensus clinical sources. This information is educational — it does not replace medical consultation.
Mechanism: Ethanol is the preferred substrate of alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH; Km ~ 1 mM vs methanol ~ 7 mM). It saturates ADH, blocking the conversion of methanol to toxic formaldehyde and formic acid.
Clinical effect: Used clinically: ethanol is an antidote in methanol poisoning (alternative: fomepizole). Uncontrolled combination masks progressive metabolic acidosis.
Management: In methanol poisoning: ethanol IV/PO to a concentration of 100–150 mg/dL or fomepizole 15 mg/kg + hemodialysis, under toxicologist supervision.
Hansten, Philip D., and John R. Horn. 2024. "The Top 100 Drug Interactions: A Guide to Patient Management." H&H Publications.
Stockley, Ivan H., ed. 2021. "Stockley's Drug Interactions." 12th ed. Pharmaceutical Press.
Indiana University. 2024. "P450 Drug Interaction Table." https://drug-interactions.medicine.iu.edu/.
Lexicomp. 2024. "Lexicomp Drug Interactions Database." Wolters Kluwer.
U.S. FDA. 2023. "Drug Development and Drug Interactions Table of Substrates, Inhibitors and Inducers." https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-interactions-labeling/drug-development-and-drug-interactions-table-substrates-inhibitors-and-inducers.
Goldfrank, Lewis R., et al. 2019. "Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies." 11th ed. McGraw-Hill (rozdz. Drug Interactions — synergie + antagonizmy w zatruciach mieszanych).
Olson, Kent R., et al. 2018. "Poisoning & Drug Overdose." 7th ed. McGraw-Hill (clinical management of interactions in overdose).
Rosenstock, Linda, et al. 2005. "Textbook of Clinical Occupational and Environmental Medicine." 2nd ed. Elsevier Saunders (occupational + drug exposure interakcje).
Lippmann, Morton. 2009. "Environmental Toxicants: Human Exposures and Their Health Effects." 3rd ed. Wiley (modulation of CYP3A4/CYP2D6 by environmental exposures).
Hayes, Wallace, and Claire L. Kruger, eds. 2014. "Hayes' Principles and Methods of Toxicology." 6th ed. CRC Press (in vitro screening DDI: rola P-gp, BCRP).
📜 Patents (public metadata)
no data
No public patent metadata was found for this substance in Crossref / OpenAlex at this time. Data will be updated automatically after the next cache refresh (24h).
📚 References (Chicago Author-Date) — click to expand
et al.. (2009). "Suicide attempt using pure methanol with hospitalization of the patient soon after ingestion: case report.". https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-31802009000200011
World Intellectual Property Organization. 2024. "Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)." https://www.wipo.int/pct/.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. 2024. "USPTO Patent Public Search." https://ppubs.uspto.gov/.
European Patent Office. 2024. "Espacenet Patent Search." https://worldwide.espacenet.com/.
Newman, David J., and Gordon M. Cragg. 2020. "Natural Products as Sources of New Drugs over the Nearly Four Decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019." Journal of Natural Products 83 (3): 770-803.
Davies, Mark, Michał Nowotka, George Papadatos, et al. 2015. "ChEMBL Web Services: Streamlining Access to Drug Discovery Data and Utilities." Nucleic Acids Research 43 (W1): W612-W620.
Bickerton, G. Richard, Gaia V. Paolini, Jérémy Besnard, Sorel Muresan, and Andrew L. Hopkins. 2012. "Quantifying the Chemical Beauty of Drugs." Nature Chemistry 4 (2): 90-98.
Meanwell, Nicholas A. 2011. "Synopsis of Some Recent Tactical Application of Bioisosteres in Drug Design." Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 54 (8): 2529-2591.
Ertl, Peter, and Ansgar Schuffenhauer. 2009. "Estimation of Synthetic Accessibility Score of Drug-Like Molecules Based on Molecular Complexity and Fragment Contributions." Journal of Cheminformatics 1: 8.
Hopkins, Andrew L., and Colin R. Groom. 2002. "The Druggable Genome." Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 1 (9): 727-730.
Allison, John R., and Mark A. Lemley. 1998. "Empirical Evidence on the Validity of Litigated Patents." AIPLA Quarterly Journal 26 (3): 185-275.
Patani, George A., and Edmond J. LaVoie. 1996. "Bioisosterism: A Rational Approach in Drug Design." Chemical Reviews 96 (8): 3147-3176.
Lerner, Josh. 1994. "The Importance of Patent Scope: An Empirical Analysis." RAND Journal of Economics 25 (2): 319-333.
Olah, George A., Alain Goeppert, and G. K. Surya Prakash. 2009. Beyond Oil and Gas: The Methanol Economy. 2nd ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
General bibliography (Chicago):
March, Jerry, and Michael B. Smith. 2020. "March's Advanced Organic Chemistry: Reactions, Mechanisms, and Structure." 8th ed. Wiley.
Carey, Francis A., and Richard J. Sundberg. 2007. "Advanced Organic Chemistry, Part B: Reactions and Synthesis." 5th ed. Springer.
Corey, E. J., and Xue-Min Cheng. 1995. "The Logic of Chemical Synthesis." Wiley.
Greene, Theodora W., and Peter G. M. Wuts. 2014. "Greene's Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis." 5th ed. Wiley.
Smith, Michael B. 2020. "Organic Synthesis." 4th ed. Academic Press.
Carey, Francis A., and Richard J. Sundberg. 2007. "Advanced Organic Chemistry, Part A: Structure and Mechanisms." 5th ed. New York: Springer.
Anslyn, Eric V., and Dennis A. Dougherty. 2006. Modern Physical Organic Chemistry. Sausalito, CA: University Science Books.
Bretherick, Leslie. 1990. Bretherick's Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards. 4th ed. London: Butterworths.
Urben, Peter, ed. 2017. Bretherick's Handbook of Reactive Chemical Hazards. 8th ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Yoshida, Tadao, Yusaku Iwata, Hiroshi Itoh, and Mitsuru Arai. 2009. Safe Storage of Reactive Chemicals. New York: Plenum Press.
Mortimer, Charles E. 2005. Chemistry: A Conceptual Approach. 9th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Engel, Thomas, and Philip Reid. 2013. Physical Chemistry. 3rd ed. Boston: Pearson.
Steinfeld, Jeffrey I., Joseph S. Francisco, and William L. Hase. 1998. Chemical Kinetics and Dynamics. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Houston, Paul L. 2001. Chemical Kinetics and Reaction Dynamics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Eyring, Henry. 1935. "The Activated Complex in Chemical Reactions." Journal of Chemical Physics 3 (2): 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1749604.
Kresge, A. Jerry. 2001. "Reaction kinetics in 100-year-old laboratories." Chemical Society Reviews 30 (4): 197–200. https://doi.org/10.1039/B100445F.
Brönsted, J. N. 1929. "Acid and Basic Catalysis." Chemical Reviews 5 (3): 231–338. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr60019a001.
Larock, Richard C. 2018. Comprehensive Organic Transformations: A Guide to Functional Group Preparations. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Mundy, Bradford P., Michael G. Ellerd, and Frank G. Favaloro Jr. 2005. Name Reactions and Reagents in Organic Synthesis. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.
Li, Jie Jack. 2014. Name Reactions: A Collection of Detailed Mechanisms and Synthetic Applications. 5th ed. Heidelberg: Springer.
Kürti, László, and Barbara Czakó. 2005. Strategic Applications of Named Reactions in Organic Synthesis. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.
Trost, Barry M., and Ian Fleming, eds. 1991. Comprehensive Organic Synthesis: Selectivity, Strategy, and Efficiency in Modern Organic Chemistry. 9 vols. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Jacobsen, Eric N., Andreas Pfaltz, and Hisashi Yamamoto, eds. 1999. Comprehensive Asymmetric Catalysis. 3 vols. Berlin: Springer.
Hartwig, John F. 2010. Organotransition Metal Chemistry: From Bonding to Catalysis. Sausalito, CA: University Science Books.
Crabtree, Robert H. 2014. The Organometallic Chemistry of the Transition Metals. 6th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Negishi, Ei-ichi, ed. 2002. Handbook of Organopalladium Chemistry for Organic Synthesis. 2 vols. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
de Meijere, Armin, and François Diederich, eds. 2004. Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions. 2nd ed. 2 vols. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
Berkessel, Albrecht, and Harald Gröger. 2005. Asymmetric Organocatalysis: From Biomimetic Concepts to Applications in Asymmetric Synthesis. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
Dalko, Peter I., ed. 2007. Enantioselective Organocatalysis: Reactions and Experimental Procedures. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
List, Benjamin, Richard A. Lerner, and Carlos F. Barbas III. 2000. "Proline-catalyzed direct asymmetric aldol reactions." Journal of the American Chemical Society 122 (10): 2395–2396. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja994280y.
MacMillan, David W. C. 2008. "The advent and development of organocatalysis." Nature 455 (7211): 304–308. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07367.
Noyori, Ryōji. 2002. "Asymmetric catalysis: science and opportunities (Nobel lecture)." Angewandte Chemie International Edition 41 (12): 2008–2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3773(20020617)41:12<2008::AID-ANIE2008>3.0.CO;2-4.
Sharpless, K. Barry. 2002. "Searching for new reactivity (Nobel lecture)." Angewandte Chemie International Edition 41 (12): 2024–2032. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3773(20020617)41:12<2024::AID-ANIE2024>3.0.CO;2-O.
Knowles, William S. 2002. "Asymmetric hydrogenations (Nobel lecture)." Angewandte Chemie International Edition 41 (12): 1998–2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3773(20020617)41:12<1998::AID-ANIE1998>3.0.CO;2-8.
Grubbs, Robert H. 2006. "Olefin-metathesis catalysts for the preparation of molecules and materials (Nobel lecture)." Angewandte Chemie International Edition 45 (23): 3760–3765. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200600680.
Schrock, Richard R. 2006. "Multiple metal-carbon bonds for catalytic metathesis reactions (Nobel lecture)." Angewandte Chemie International Edition 45 (23): 3748–3759. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200600085.
Suzuki, Akira. 2011. "Cross-coupling reactions of organoboranes: an easy way to construct C-C bonds (Nobel lecture)." Angewandte Chemie International Edition 50 (30): 6722–6737. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201101379.
Negishi, Ei-ichi. 2011. "Magical power of transition metals: past, present, and future (Nobel lecture)." Angewandte Chemie International Edition 50 (30): 6738–6764. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201101380.
List, Benjamin, and David W. C. MacMillan. 2022. "Asymmetric organocatalysis (Nobel lecture)." Angewandte Chemie International Edition 61 (38): e202205927. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202205927.
Bertozzi, Carolyn R., Morten Meldal, and K. Barry Sharpless. 2023. "Click chemistry and bioorthogonal chemistry (Nobel lectures)." Angewandte Chemie International Edition 62 (16): e202300332. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202300332.
Wittcoff, Harold A., Bryan G. Reuben, and Jeffrey S. Plotkin. 2013. Industrial Organic Chemicals. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Appl, Max. 2006. "Ammonia, 2. Production Processes." In Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. https://doi.org/10.1002/14356007.o02_o11.
Thiemann, Michael, Erich Scheibler, and Karl Wilhelm Wiegand. 2000. "Nitric Acid, Nitrous Acid, and Nitrogen Oxides." In Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. https://doi.org/10.1002/14356007.a17_293.
Hocking, Martin B. 2005. Handbook of Chemical Technology and Pollution Control. 3rd ed. Burlington, MA: Academic Press.
Corey, E. J., and László Kürti. 2010. Enantioselective Chemical Synthesis: Methods, Logic, and Practice. Direct Book Publishing.
Nicolaou, K. C., and E. J. Sorensen. 1996. Classics in Total Synthesis: Targets, Strategies, Methods. Weinheim: VCH.
Nicolaou, K. C., and Jason S. Chen. 2011. Classics in Total Synthesis III: Further Targets, Strategies, Methods. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
House, Herbert O. 1972. Modern Synthetic Reactions. 2nd ed. Menlo Park, CA: W. A. Benjamin.
Organic Syntheses, Inc. 2024. "Organic Syntheses Collective Volumes 1–10 (1932–2004) and Annual Volumes 1–100 (1922–2024)." Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://www.orgsyn.org/.
Paquette, Leo A., David Crich, Philip L. Fuchs, Gary A. Molander, and Andre B. Charette, eds. 2009. Encyclopedia of Reagents for Organic Synthesis (e-EROS). 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/047084289X.
EURet al.. (2009). "Suicide attempt using pure methanol with hospitalization of the patient soon after ingestion: case report.". https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-31802009000200011
📊 X-ray Diffraction (PXRD)
High quality 30%
Crystallographic data for 67-56-1 verified against COD (0 diffraction peaks). The 2θ values below allow identification of the polymorphic form by PXRD in the laboratory.
International Centre for Diffraction Data. 2024. PDF-4+ 2024. Newtown Square, PA: ICDD. 🔓
Allen, Frank H. 2002. "The Cambridge Structural Database: a quarter of a million crystal structures and rising." Acta Crystallographica B 58 (3): 380–388. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108768102003890
Grazulis, Saulius, Adriana Merkys, Antanas Vaitkus, and Daniel Chateigner. 2012. "Computing stoichiometric molecular composition from crystal structures." Journal of Applied Crystallography 45 (6): 1241–1248. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889812042185Open Access
Cullity, B. D., and Stuart R. Stock. 2001. Elements of X-Ray Diffraction. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Jenkins, Ron, and Robert L. Snyder. 1996. Introduction to X-Ray Powder Diffractometry. New York: Wiley-Interscience. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118520949
Giacovazzo, Carmelo, Hugo L. Monaco, Giuseppe Artioli, Davide Viterbo, Marco Milanesio, Gastone Gilli, Paola Gilli, Giuseppe Zanotti, Giampiero Ferraris, and Mario Catti. 2011. Fundamentals of Crystallography. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dinnebier, Robert E., and Simon J. L. Billinge, eds. 2008. Powder Diffraction: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781847558237
United States Pharmacopeia. 2024. "Chapter <941> Characterization of Crystalline and Partially Crystalline Solids by X-Ray Powder Diffraction (XRPD)." USP-NF. Rockville, MD: USP. 🔓
FAQ — frequently asked questions about PXRD
What is the 2θ angle in PXRD?
2θ is the angle between the incident beam and the diffracted beam, measured in degrees. Bragg's law (nλ = 2d·sinθ) relates the diffraction angle to the d-spacing between lattice planes. For Cu Kα (λ=1.54056 Å) typical peaks lie in the 5–70° range. Each peak corresponds to a different family of hkl planes.
What is a CIF file and what does it contain?
CIF (Crystallographic Information File) is the standard format for crystallographic data (IUCr, 1991). It contains: unit cell parameters (_cell_length_a/b/c, _cell_angle_*), the space group (_symmetry_space_group_name_H-M), atomic coordinates (_atom_site_*), the R-factor, the publication DOI and optionally the PXRD pattern (_pd_peak_2theta). Parsing CIF is the starting point for any integration with crystallographic databases.
What is the COD (Crystallography Open Database)?
COD is a free database of open crystal structures (crystallography.net/cod) with more than 533,000 entries. Every structure has a CIF file (Crystallographic Information File) with complete data: cell parameters, space group, atomic coordinates, publication DOI. The data is available under a CC0 licence (public domain).
What does I/I₀ (relative intensity) mean?
I/I₀ is the intensity of a peak expressed as a percentage of the intensity of the strongest peak (I₀=100). Intensity depends on the number of atoms in the plane, their type (atomic factor) and thermal scattering. For identifying a polymorphic form it is the SET of peaks that matters — not individual values.
Have a blog, forum or scientific service? Embed the interactive 3D molecule on your website — every reader will see it, with a link below to the safety data sheet for that substance.
🔗 HTML iframe code (easiest — works everywhere)
Copy and paste into your site's HTML editor:
Adjust width and height to your layout.
⚙ WordPress Shortcode (for other shops with MOL-GOD)
🌐 Direct link (for emails, chats, LinkedIn, Twitter)
When you share the link, Facebook/LinkedIn/Discord will automatically fetch the image preview:
📋 License: The embed keeps a backlink to MolGod (required — the shop is the data source). Chemical data comes from PubChem (CC0 — public domain). The embed is FREE for educational, commercial and hobby use.
📚 REFERENCES (Aggregate bibliography, Chicago Author-Date) 78 items
All scientific sources cited in the accordions above for CAS 67-56-1. Format: Chicago Manual of Style 17th ed., Author-Date system.
AIST. n.d. Spectral Database for Organic Compounds (SDBS): CAS 67-56-1. Tsukuba, Japan: National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology. https://sdbs.db.aist.go.jp/.
Linstrom, Peter J., and William G. Mallard, eds. n.d. NIST Chemistry WebBook: NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.18434/T4D303.
PubChem. n.d. PubChem Compound Summary: CAS 67-56-1. Bethesda, MD: National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), National Library of Medicine. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/#query=67-56-1.
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). 2024. "Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP) — Harmonised Classification and Labelling." ECHA, Helsinki / Official Journal of the European Union. https://echa.europa.eu/regulations/clp/clp-classification.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 2017. "Recommendations for Chemical Protective Clothing: A Companion to the NIOSH Pocket Guide." U.S. Department of Health & Human Services / CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ncpc/default.html.
Connors, Kenneth A., Gordon L. Amidon, and Valentino J. Stella. 1986. Chemical Stability of Pharmaceuticals: A Handbook for Pharmacists, 2nd ed.. New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471734683.
Rumble, John R., ed. 2019. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics: 100th Edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. https://hbcp.chemnetbase.com/.
Stefanis, Emmanuel, and Costas Panayiotou. 2008. "Prediction of Hansen Solubility Parameters with a New Group-Contribution Method." International Journal of Thermophysics 29: 568-585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-008-0415-z.
Stoll, Vincent S., and John S. Blanchard. 1990. "Buffers: Principles and Practice: In Methods in Enzymology, vol. 182." San Diego: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(90)82008-P.
European Parliament. 2008. "Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP)." Official Journal of the European Union L 353: 1–1355.
United Nations. 2021. Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS). 9th revised ed. ST/SG/AC.10/30/Rev.9. New York and Geneva: United Nations. https://unece.org/ghs-rev9-2021.
United States Pharmacopeial Convention. 2024. "USP <621> Chromatography." In United States Pharmacopeia and National Formulary, USP 47-NF 42. Rockville, MD: USP. https://www.uspnf.com/.
International Organization for Standardization. 2017. "ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories." Geneva: ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/66912.html.
Kolthoff, Izaak Maurits, and Philip J. Elving, eds. 1978. Treatise on Analytical Chemistry, Part I: Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
Skoog, Douglas A., F. James Holler, and Stanley R. Crouch. 2018. Principles of Instrumental Analysis. 7th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning.
Christian, Gary D., Purnendu K. Dasgupta, and Kevin A. Schug. 2014. Analytical Chemistry. 7th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
International Organization for Standardization. 1994. "ISO 5725-2:1994 Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Measurement Methods and Results — Part 2: Basic Method for the Determination of Repeatability and Reproducibility of a Standard Measurement Method." Geneva: ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/11834.html.
Heckert, N. A., and J. J. Filliben. 2003. "NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook of Statistical Methods." NIST Handbook 151. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/.
Grubbs, Frank E. 1950. "Sample Criteria for Testing Outlying Observations." Annals of Mathematical Statistics 21 (1): 27–58.
Dixon, Wilfrid J. 1950. "Analysis of Extreme Values." Annals of Mathematical Statistics 21 (4): 488–506.
Snedecor, George W., and William G. Cochran. 1989. Statistical Methods. 8th ed. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
Student [William Sealy Gosset]. 1908. "The Probable Error of a Mean." Biometrika 6 (1): 1–25.
International Organization for Standardization. 2005. "ISO 3534-1:2006 Statistics — Vocabulary and Symbols — Part 1: General Statistical Terms and Terms Used in Probability." Geneva: ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/40145.html.
Thompson, Michael, Stephen L. R. Ellison, and Roger Wood. 2002. "Harmonized Guidelines for Single-Laboratory Validation of Methods of Analysis." Pure and Applied Chemistry 74 (5): 835–855.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. 2024. European Agreement Concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR), Applicable as from 1 January 2025 (ECE/TRANS/352). Geneva: UNECE. https://unece.org/transport/dangerous-goods/adr-2025-edition.
Ministerstwo Klimatu i Środowiska Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. 2020. "Rozporządzenie Ministra Klimatu z dnia 2 stycznia 2020 r. w sprawie katalogu odpadów." Dziennik Ustaw RP 2020 poz. 10. https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20200000010. National rules — Poland
Główny Inspektorat Ochrony Środowiska (GIOŚ). 2024. "Baza Danych O Odpadach (BDO) — System rejestracji firm utylizacyjnych." Ministerstwo Klimatu i Środowiska. https://bdo.mos.gov.pl/. National rules — Poland
International Organization for Standardization. 2017. "ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories." ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/66912.html.
World Health Organization. 2010. "WHO Good Manufacturing Practices for Pharmaceutical Products: Main Principles (WHO Technical Report Series No. 957, Annex 3)." WHO Press. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/trs957-annex3.
Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme (PIC/S). 2021. "Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products PE 009-15." PIC/S Secretariat, Geneva. https://picscheme.org/en/publications.
